CVE-2025-6775VulnerabilityPublished 27 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-6775: xiaoyunjie openvpn-cms-flask · Command Injection

Affects xiaoyunjie openvpn-cms-flaskSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 3.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 87% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubxiaoyunjie/openvpn-cms-flask`pkg:github/xiaoyunjie/openvpn-cms-flask`Other threats	Affected =1.2.0 =1.2.1 =1.2.2 =1.2.3 =1.2.4 =1.2.5 =1.2.6 =1.2.7	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately assess their deployment of openvpn-cms-flask and identify any instances running affected versions (1.2.0 to 1.2.7). The primary mitigation is to upgrade all affected instances to version 1.2.8 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Until upgrades can be applied, organizations should restrict access to the User Creation Endpoint by implementing network-level controls such as IP whitelisting, VPN segmentation, or firewall rules to limit exposure to trusted administrators only. Additionally, monitoring and logging of user creation activities should be enhanced to detect anomalous commands or patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. Employing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block command injection patterns in the Username parameter can provide temporary protection. Regularly auditing user privileges and enforcing the principle of least privilege for accounts that can access the vulnerable endpoint will reduce the risk. Finally, organizations should stay alert for any emerging exploit reports and update incident response plans accordingly.

Description

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in xiaoyunjie openvpn-cms-flask up to 1.2.7. This affects the function create_user of the file /app/api/v1/openvpn.py of the component User Creation Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Username leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.2.8 is able to address this issue. The patch is named e23559b98c8ea2957f09978c29f4e512ba789eb6. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Impact

For European organizations using openvpn-cms-flask versions 1.2.0 to 1.2.7, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized command execution on VPN management servers. Given that VPN infrastructure is often a critical access point for remote employees and partners, exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to internal networks, data exfiltration, or disruption of VPN services. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability requires some level of privilege, the potential for lateral movement and privilege escalation exists if attackers gain initial footholds. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on VPNs for secure remote access, such as finance, healthcare, and government, could face operational disruptions and data breaches. The fact that exploitation does not require user interaction increases the risk of automated attacks. Additionally, the public disclosure of the vulnerability may prompt threat actors to develop exploits targeting European organizations, especially those with less mature patch management processes.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Jun 2025, 20:24 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats