VulnerabilityPublished 17 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-67787: Cross-site Scripting

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.6 Critical.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

9.6Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 18% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

Germany

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Monitor DriveLock’s official channels closely for the release of security patches addressing CVE-2025-67787 and apply them immediately upon availability. 2. Until patches are available, implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user inputs interacting with the Operations Center interface to reduce injection risk. 3. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts within the web application context. 4. Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users accessing the Operations Center to reduce the impact of session hijacking. 5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on web application security to detect similar vulnerabilities proactively. 6. Monitor network traffic and logs for unusual session activity or indicators of compromise related to session takeover attempts. 7. Educate users about the risks of clicking unsolicited links or opening suspicious content that could trigger XSS attacks. 8. Consider isolating the Operations Center interface within a secure network segment with limited access to reduce exposure.

Description

CVE-2025-67787 is a critical Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting DriveLock Operations Center versions prior to 25.1.5. This flaw allows an attacker to execute malicious scripts in the context of a victim's browser, potentially leading to session takeover over a network. Exploitation requires user interaction but no prior authentication, and the vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the high CVSS score of 9.6 indicates a severe risk. European organizations using DriveLock Operations Center should prioritize patching once updates become available. Countries with significant deployments of DriveLock products, especially Germany and neighboring EU states with strong cybersecurity regulations, are most likely to be targeted. Mitigation involves applying patches promptly, implementing strict input validation and Content Security Policies, and monitoring for suspicious activity related to session hijacking attempts.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive security management data and user sessions within DriveLock Operations Center. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to administrative functions, manipulation of security policies, or exposure of sensitive endpoint data. This could undermine the overall security posture of affected enterprises, potentially leading to broader network compromise or data breaches. Given the critical nature of the vulnerability and the widespread use of DriveLock products in Europe, particularly in Germany and other EU countries with stringent cybersecurity frameworks, the impact could be substantial. Organizations in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure are especially at risk due to the potential for compliance violations and operational disruptions.

Summary

CVE-2025-67787 is a critical Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in DriveLock Operations Center versions earlier than 25.1.5. The vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of user-supplied input, classified under CWE-79, which allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. When a victim accesses a compromised page, the injected script executes within their browser context, enabling attackers to hijack user sessions, steal authentication tokens, or perform actions on behalf of the victim. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely over a network without requiring prior authentication, though it does require user interaction such as clicking a crafted link or visiting a malicious page. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.6 reflects the high impact on confidentiality and integrity, with a low attack complexity and no privileges required. While no public exploits are currently known, the potential for session takeover makes this vulnerability critical. DriveLock Operations Center is a security management platform used primarily in enterprise environments for endpoint protection and policy enforcement, making this vulnerability particularly concerning for organizations relying on it for security operations. The lack of available patches at the time of disclosure necessitates immediate attention to mitigation strategies.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

drivelock.help/versions/current/web/en/releasenotes/Content/ReleaseNotes_DriveLock/SecurityBulletins/25-002-CrossSiteScripting.htm (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Dec 2025, 20:47 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats