CVE-2025-68383: CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in Elastic Filebeat
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) in Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor can allow a user to trigger a Buffer Overflow (CAPEC-100) and cause a denial of service (panic/crash) of the Filebeat process via either a malformed Syslog message or a malicious tokenizer pattern in the Dissect configuration.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-68383 is a vulnerability identified in Elastic Filebeat, a widely used log shipper component of the Elastic Stack. The flaw stems from improper validation of specified indices, positions, or offsets within input data processed by the Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor. Specifically, malformed Syslog messages or maliciously crafted tokenizer patterns in the Dissect configuration can trigger a buffer overflow condition (CAPEC-100). This buffer overflow leads to a denial of service by causing the Filebeat process to panic and crash. The vulnerability affects multiple major versions of Filebeat, including 7.0.0, 8.0.0, 9.0.0, and 9.2.0, indicating a broad impact across deployed instances. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.5, with an attack vector of adjacent network (AV:A), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and impact limited to availability (A:H) without affecting confidentiality or integrity. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability presents a risk of service disruption in environments relying on Filebeat for log ingestion and processing. The root cause is a failure to properly validate input parameters that specify quantities or offsets, leading to memory corruption and process instability. This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust input validation in parsers and tokenizers that handle external data sources.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-68383 is the potential denial of service of Filebeat instances responsible for collecting and forwarding logs to central monitoring and security analytics platforms. This disruption can lead to gaps in log data availability, impairing incident detection, compliance monitoring, and forensic investigations. Critical infrastructure sectors such as finance, energy, telecommunications, and government agencies that rely heavily on Elastic Stack for security information and event management (SIEM) may experience reduced visibility into their environments during an attack or accidental exploitation. Although the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the loss of availability can delay response to other security incidents and increase operational risk. Additionally, organizations with distributed deployments of Filebeat across multiple sites may face cascading monitoring failures if multiple instances are targeted simultaneously. The lack of required privileges or user interaction lowers the barrier for attackers with network access to exploit this vulnerability, increasing the threat surface. However, the absence of known exploits in the wild suggests the risk is currently theoretical but should be proactively addressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-68383, European organizations should: 1) Monitor Elastic’s official channels for patches addressing this vulnerability and apply updates promptly once released, as no patches are currently available. 2) Implement strict input validation and sanitization on Syslog message sources before they reach Filebeat, including filtering or normalizing malformed or suspicious messages. 3) Review and harden Dissect processor configurations to avoid overly permissive or complex tokenizer patterns that could be exploited. 4) Deploy network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of Filebeat instances to untrusted or unnecessary network segments, reducing the attack surface. 5) Enable robust monitoring and alerting on Filebeat process crashes or restarts to detect exploitation attempts early. 6) Consider fallback or redundancy mechanisms for log collection to maintain visibility during potential denial of service events. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and fuzz testing on log ingestion pipelines to identify similar input validation weaknesses proactively. These measures, combined with timely patching, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden
CVE-2025-68383: CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in Elastic Filebeat
Description
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) in Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor can allow a user to trigger a Buffer Overflow (CAPEC-100) and cause a denial of service (panic/crash) of the Filebeat process via either a malformed Syslog message or a malicious tokenizer pattern in the Dissect configuration.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-68383 is a vulnerability identified in Elastic Filebeat, a widely used log shipper component of the Elastic Stack. The flaw stems from improper validation of specified indices, positions, or offsets within input data processed by the Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor. Specifically, malformed Syslog messages or maliciously crafted tokenizer patterns in the Dissect configuration can trigger a buffer overflow condition (CAPEC-100). This buffer overflow leads to a denial of service by causing the Filebeat process to panic and crash. The vulnerability affects multiple major versions of Filebeat, including 7.0.0, 8.0.0, 9.0.0, and 9.2.0, indicating a broad impact across deployed instances. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.5, with an attack vector of adjacent network (AV:A), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and impact limited to availability (A:H) without affecting confidentiality or integrity. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability presents a risk of service disruption in environments relying on Filebeat for log ingestion and processing. The root cause is a failure to properly validate input parameters that specify quantities or offsets, leading to memory corruption and process instability. This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust input validation in parsers and tokenizers that handle external data sources.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-68383 is the potential denial of service of Filebeat instances responsible for collecting and forwarding logs to central monitoring and security analytics platforms. This disruption can lead to gaps in log data availability, impairing incident detection, compliance monitoring, and forensic investigations. Critical infrastructure sectors such as finance, energy, telecommunications, and government agencies that rely heavily on Elastic Stack for security information and event management (SIEM) may experience reduced visibility into their environments during an attack or accidental exploitation. Although the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the loss of availability can delay response to other security incidents and increase operational risk. Additionally, organizations with distributed deployments of Filebeat across multiple sites may face cascading monitoring failures if multiple instances are targeted simultaneously. The lack of required privileges or user interaction lowers the barrier for attackers with network access to exploit this vulnerability, increasing the threat surface. However, the absence of known exploits in the wild suggests the risk is currently theoretical but should be proactively addressed.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-68383, European organizations should: 1) Monitor Elastic’s official channels for patches addressing this vulnerability and apply updates promptly once released, as no patches are currently available. 2) Implement strict input validation and sanitization on Syslog message sources before they reach Filebeat, including filtering or normalizing malformed or suspicious messages. 3) Review and harden Dissect processor configurations to avoid overly permissive or complex tokenizer patterns that could be exploited. 4) Deploy network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure of Filebeat instances to untrusted or unnecessary network segments, reducing the attack surface. 5) Enable robust monitoring and alerting on Filebeat process crashes or restarts to detect exploitation attempts early. 6) Consider fallback or redundancy mechanisms for log collection to maintain visibility during potential denial of service events. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and fuzz testing on log ingestion pipelines to identify similar input validation weaknesses proactively. These measures, combined with timely patching, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- elastic
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-16T17:26:09.355Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69447c134eb3efac36aec21c
Added to database: 12/18/2025, 10:11:31 PM
Last enriched: 12/18/2025, 10:28:34 PM
Last updated: 12/19/2025, 6:44:17 AM
Views: 11
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14267: CWE-212 Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer in M-Files Corporation M-Files Server
MediumCVE-2025-13307: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in Ocean Modal Window
CriticalThe Case for Dynamic AI-SaaS Security as Copilots Scale
MediumNorth Korea-Linked Hackers Steal $2.02 Billion in 2025, Leading Global Crypto Theft
MediumCVE-2025-14546: Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) in fastapi-sso
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.