CVE-2025-68704: CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values in samrocketman jervis
CVE-2025-68704 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting versions of the Jervis library prior to 2. 2. The issue stems from the use of java. util. Random(), which is not cryptographically secure, leading to insufficient randomness in critical operations. This weakness can enable timing attacks that compromise the integrity of Jenkins pipeline scripts relying on Jervis. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction but has a high attack complexity, limiting exploitation ease. European organizations using Jenkins with Jervis versions below 2. 2 are at risk, especially those in sectors relying heavily on CI/CD pipelines. The vulnerability has no known exploits in the wild yet, but patching to version 2.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-68704 identifies a cryptographic weakness in the Jervis library, a tool used to facilitate Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Versions prior to 2.2 utilize java.util.Random(), a pseudo-random number generator that is not designed for cryptographic security. This insufficient randomness can be exploited through timing attacks, where an attacker analyzes the time taken by operations to infer sensitive information or predict random values. Since Jenkins pipelines often automate critical build, test, and deployment processes, compromising the randomness can lead to manipulation or bypassing of security controls embedded in these scripts. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values) and has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.2, indicating high severity. The attack vector is network-based with high attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and impacts confidentiality significantly. Although no known exploits are currently reported, the vulnerability poses a substantial risk to the integrity of CI/CD workflows. The fix implemented in Jervis 2.2 replaces java.util.Random() with a cryptographically secure random number generator, mitigating the timing attack risk. Organizations relying on Jenkins automation should prioritize upgrading to the patched version and review their pipeline security practices.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the vulnerability threatens the integrity and confidentiality of automated CI/CD pipelines that use Jervis versions below 2.2. Exploitation could allow attackers to predict or manipulate random values used in pipeline scripts, potentially leading to unauthorized code execution, bypass of security checks, or injection of malicious artifacts into software builds. This undermines trust in software supply chains and could result in widespread operational disruption, data breaches, or compliance violations. Sectors such as finance, manufacturing, telecommunications, and government agencies that heavily depend on Jenkins for continuous integration and deployment are particularly at risk. The high CVSS score reflects the potential for significant damage despite the high attack complexity. The absence of known exploits suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before active exploitation occurs. Failure to address this vulnerability could expose European critical infrastructure and enterprises to advanced persistent threats targeting software development pipelines.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade Jervis to version 2.2 or later immediately to ensure the use of cryptographically secure random number generators. 2. Audit all Jenkins pipeline scripts and Job DSL plugins that depend on Jervis to identify and remediate any reliance on insecure randomness. 3. Implement runtime monitoring and anomaly detection for Jenkins pipelines to detect unusual timing patterns or behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 4. Enforce strict access controls and network segmentation around Jenkins servers to reduce exposure to network-based attacks. 5. Integrate cryptographic best practices into CI/CD pipeline development, including the use of secure random functions and regular security code reviews. 6. Maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans tailored to CI/CD infrastructure compromise scenarios. 7. Engage in threat intelligence sharing within industry groups to stay informed about emerging exploits targeting Jenkins and related tooling.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy
CVE-2025-68704: CWE-330: Use of Insufficiently Random Values in samrocketman jervis
Description
CVE-2025-68704 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting versions of the Jervis library prior to 2. 2. The issue stems from the use of java. util. Random(), which is not cryptographically secure, leading to insufficient randomness in critical operations. This weakness can enable timing attacks that compromise the integrity of Jenkins pipeline scripts relying on Jervis. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction but has a high attack complexity, limiting exploitation ease. European organizations using Jenkins with Jervis versions below 2. 2 are at risk, especially those in sectors relying heavily on CI/CD pipelines. The vulnerability has no known exploits in the wild yet, but patching to version 2.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-68704 identifies a cryptographic weakness in the Jervis library, a tool used to facilitate Job DSL plugin scripts and shared Jenkins pipeline libraries. Versions prior to 2.2 utilize java.util.Random(), a pseudo-random number generator that is not designed for cryptographic security. This insufficient randomness can be exploited through timing attacks, where an attacker analyzes the time taken by operations to infer sensitive information or predict random values. Since Jenkins pipelines often automate critical build, test, and deployment processes, compromising the randomness can lead to manipulation or bypassing of security controls embedded in these scripts. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values) and has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.2, indicating high severity. The attack vector is network-based with high attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and impacts confidentiality significantly. Although no known exploits are currently reported, the vulnerability poses a substantial risk to the integrity of CI/CD workflows. The fix implemented in Jervis 2.2 replaces java.util.Random() with a cryptographically secure random number generator, mitigating the timing attack risk. Organizations relying on Jenkins automation should prioritize upgrading to the patched version and review their pipeline security practices.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the vulnerability threatens the integrity and confidentiality of automated CI/CD pipelines that use Jervis versions below 2.2. Exploitation could allow attackers to predict or manipulate random values used in pipeline scripts, potentially leading to unauthorized code execution, bypass of security checks, or injection of malicious artifacts into software builds. This undermines trust in software supply chains and could result in widespread operational disruption, data breaches, or compliance violations. Sectors such as finance, manufacturing, telecommunications, and government agencies that heavily depend on Jenkins for continuous integration and deployment are particularly at risk. The high CVSS score reflects the potential for significant damage despite the high attack complexity. The absence of known exploits suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before active exploitation occurs. Failure to address this vulnerability could expose European critical infrastructure and enterprises to advanced persistent threats targeting software development pipelines.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade Jervis to version 2.2 or later immediately to ensure the use of cryptographically secure random number generators. 2. Audit all Jenkins pipeline scripts and Job DSL plugins that depend on Jervis to identify and remediate any reliance on insecure randomness. 3. Implement runtime monitoring and anomaly detection for Jenkins pipelines to detect unusual timing patterns or behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 4. Enforce strict access controls and network segmentation around Jenkins servers to reduce exposure to network-based attacks. 5. Integrate cryptographic best practices into CI/CD pipeline development, including the use of secure random functions and regular security code reviews. 6. Maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans tailored to CI/CD infrastructure compromise scenarios. 7. Engage in threat intelligence sharing within industry groups to stay informed about emerging exploits targeting Jenkins and related tooling.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-23T22:32:51.733Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69669feba60475309fa994ea
Added to database: 1/13/2026, 7:41:31 PM
Last enriched: 1/21/2026, 2:59:25 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 9:17:26 PM
Views: 46
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2113: Deserialization in yuan1994 tpadmin
MediumCVE-2026-2111: Path Traversal in JeecgBoot
MediumCVE-2026-2110: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in Tasin1025 SwiftBuy
MediumCVE-2026-2109: Improper Authorization in jsbroks COCO Annotator
MediumCVE-2026-2108: Denial of Service in jsbroks COCO Annotator
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.