Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-69227: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in aio-libs aiohttp

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-69227cvecve-2025-69227cwe-835
Published: Mon Jan 05 2026 (01/05/2026, 23:19:31 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: aio-libs
Product: aiohttp

Description

AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below allow for an infinite loop to occur when assert statements are bypassed, resulting in a DoS attack when processing a POST body. If optimizations are enabled (-O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1), and the application includes a handler that uses the Request.post() method, then an attacker may be able to execute a DoS attack with a specially crafted message. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/05/2026, 23:52:10 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-69227 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-835 (Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition) affecting aiohttp, a widely used asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for Python's asyncio library. The issue manifests when Python applications run with optimizations enabled (using the -O flag or setting PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1), which causes assert statements to be ignored. In aiohttp versions 3.13.2 and earlier, certain code paths that rely on assert statements to validate or exit loops during POST request body processing can enter an infinite loop if those asserts are bypassed. Specifically, when a handler uses the Request.post() method, a specially crafted POST request can trigger this infinite loop, causing the server to hang and effectively resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.6 (medium severity), reflecting the network attack vector, low attack complexity, and high impact on availability. The issue was publicly disclosed on January 5, 2026, and fixed in aiohttp version 3.13.3. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. This vulnerability highlights the risks of relying on assert statements for critical control flow in production code, especially when Python optimizations are enabled.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact is the risk of denial-of-service attacks against web services built using vulnerable aiohttp versions with Python optimizations enabled. This can lead to service outages, degraded performance, and potential disruption of critical business operations, especially for services handling POST requests extensively. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government that rely on asynchronous Python web frameworks may experience operational interruptions. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity but can indirectly affect availability and reliability of services. Given the ease of remote exploitation without authentication, attackers could target exposed endpoints to cause outages. This may also impact cloud-hosted services and SaaS providers using aiohttp, potentially affecting European customers and users. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as the vulnerability is publicly known and fixed versions are available.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Upgrade all aiohttp deployments to version 3.13.3 or later immediately to apply the fix. 2. Audit Python applications to identify any reliance on assert statements for critical control flow or input validation, especially in request handling code, and replace them with explicit error handling. 3. Avoid running Python applications with the -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 flags in production environments, as this disables assert statements and can mask logic errors. 4. Implement rate limiting and request validation on POST endpoints to reduce the risk of DoS attacks. 5. Monitor application logs and performance metrics for signs of infinite loops or hanging processes related to POST request handling. 6. Conduct penetration testing and fuzzing on POST request handlers to detect similar logic flaws. 7. Educate developers on the risks of using assert statements for runtime checks in production code. 8. Consider deploying application-level DoS protections and web application firewalls (WAFs) that can detect and block anomalous POST requests.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2025-12-29T20:53:19.433Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 695c4b4e3839e44175984995

Added to database: 1/5/2026, 11:37:50 PM

Last enriched: 1/5/2026, 11:52:10 PM

Last updated: 1/8/2026, 2:07:50 PM

Views: 21

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats