CVE-2025-7801VulnerabilityPublished 18 Jul 2025Updated 22 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7801: BossSoft CRM · SQL Injection

Affects BossSoft CRMSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 31% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubbosssoft/CRM`pkg:github/bosssoft/CRM`Other threats	Affected =6.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately conduct a thorough audit of their BossSoft CRM 6.0 deployments to identify exposure to the vulnerable JSP endpoint. Since no official patches are currently available, organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Apply Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules tailored to detect and block SQL Injection attempts targeting the 'cstid' parameter, including patterns of SQL syntax and anomalous input lengths or characters. 2) Employ input validation and sanitization at the application layer, if source code access is possible, to enforce strict parameter type and length constraints. 3) Restrict network access to the CRM application to trusted IP ranges and enforce VPN or zero-trust access models to reduce exposure. 4) Monitor CRM logs for unusual query patterns or errors indicative of injection attempts. 5) Prepare for rapid patch deployment by maintaining close contact with BossSoft for forthcoming security updates. 6) Conduct internal penetration testing focusing on the vulnerable endpoint to assess exploitability and impact. 7) Educate IT and security teams about this vulnerability to ensure timely detection and response.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in BossSoft CRM 6.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /crm/module/HNDCBas_customPrmSearchDtl.jsp. The manipulation of the argument cstid leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using BossSoft CRM 6.0, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality and integrity of customer and business data. Compromise of CRM data can lead to exposure of personally identifiable information (PII), trade secrets, and strategic business information, which may violate GDPR and other data protection regulations, resulting in legal and financial penalties. Additionally, disruption or manipulation of CRM data can impair sales, marketing, and customer support functions, causing operational downtime and reputational damage. The remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit increases the threat landscape, as attackers can attempt exploitation without needing internal access or user interaction. Organizations in sectors with high regulatory scrutiny or handling sensitive customer data, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, are particularly vulnerable. The medium CVSS score reflects moderate impact, but the critical classification by the vendor and the public disclosure of exploit details warrant urgent attention.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…