Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-8084: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in tigroumeow AI Engine

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-8084cvecve-2025-8084cwe-918
Published: Tue Nov 18 2025 (11/18/2025, 12:29:48 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: tigroumeow
Product: AI Engine

Description

The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.8 via the rest_helpers_create_images function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Editor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On Cloud instances, this issue allows for metadata retrieving.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/25/2025, 13:10:33 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-8084 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability classified under CWE-918, affecting the tigroumeow AI Engine plugin for WordPress in all versions up to and including 3.1.8. The vulnerability exists in the rest_helpers_create_images function, which allows authenticated users with Editor-level or higher privileges to induce the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary locations. SSRF vulnerabilities enable attackers to bypass network access controls by leveraging the server's network privileges, potentially accessing internal services that are not exposed externally. In this case, the attacker can query and modify internal services, which may include sensitive APIs or databases. On cloud-hosted WordPress instances, the vulnerability can be exploited to retrieve metadata from the cloud provider's metadata service, potentially exposing credentials or configuration details. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 6.8, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, low attack complexity, and requiring high privileges but no user interaction. The impact is primarily on confidentiality, as attackers can access sensitive internal information, but there is no direct impact on integrity or availability. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk to environments where the plugin is installed and accessible to users with sufficient privileges.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive internal information, including cloud metadata that may contain credentials or configuration data. This can facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation, lateral movement, or data exfiltration. Organizations using WordPress with the tigroumeow AI Engine plugin, especially those on cloud infrastructure, face increased risk. The ability for an attacker with Editor-level access to exploit this SSRF means insider threats or compromised accounts can leverage this flaw to access internal services otherwise protected by network segmentation or firewalls. This can undermine confidentiality and potentially expose critical internal APIs or services. The impact is heightened in sectors with stringent data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government. Additionally, the vulnerability could be used to gather intelligence on internal network architecture, aiding more sophisticated attacks.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediately update the tigroumeow AI Engine plugin to a patched version once available. If no patch is currently released, consider disabling the plugin or restricting its use to trusted administrators only. 2. Limit Editor-level and higher privileges strictly to trusted users to reduce the risk of exploitation. 3. Implement network-level controls to restrict outbound HTTP requests from the WordPress server to only necessary destinations, preventing arbitrary SSRF requests. 4. On cloud instances, restrict access to metadata services using cloud provider-specific controls (e.g., AWS IMDSv2 enforcement, GCP metadata server firewall rules). 5. Monitor logs for unusual outbound requests originating from the WordPress server, especially to internal IP ranges or metadata endpoints. 6. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious SSRF patterns targeting the rest_helpers_create_images function. 7. Conduct regular security audits and privilege reviews to ensure minimal necessary access is granted to users.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2025-07-23T13:29:23.642Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 691c6dffc50334694aba91b7

Added to database: 11/18/2025, 1:00:47 PM

Last enriched: 11/25/2025, 1:10:33 PM

Last updated: 1/8/2026, 5:19:55 AM

Views: 76

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats