CVE-2025-9056VulnerabilityPublished 10 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-9056: TECNO com.transsion.audiosmartconnect · Incorrect Authorization

Affects TECNO com.transsion.audiosmartconnectSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 11% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TECNO com.transsion.audiosmartconnect	Affected =1.3.0.87	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Restrict physical and local access to TECNO devices running the vulnerable AudioLink component to trusted personnel only. 2. Monitor devices for unusual local service invocations or file modifications indicative of exploitation attempts. 3. Implement mobile device management (MDM) solutions to enforce security policies and detect anomalous behavior on TECNO devices. 4. Apply vendor patches or updates promptly once available; engage with TECNO support channels to obtain fixes. 5. Disable or restrict the vulnerable AudioLink service if feasible, or employ application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized service invocation. 6. Educate users about the risks of local device compromise and enforce strong authentication mechanisms to reduce unauthorized physical access. 7. Conduct regular security audits on mobile devices to identify unauthorized changes or suspicious activity. 8. For environments with high security needs, consider limiting or segregating TECNO device usage until the vulnerability is remediated.

Description

Unprotected service in the AudioLink component allows a local attacker to overwrite system files via unauthorized service invocation.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-9056 is primarily relevant if TECNO devices running the vulnerable AudioLink component are in use within their environment. The vulnerability allows local attackers to overwrite system files, which could lead to device instability, denial of service, or serve as a stepping stone for privilege escalation. While the direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is limited, the ability to overwrite system files can compromise device reliability and security posture. Organizations relying on TECNO mobile devices for critical communications or operations may face operational disruptions if exploited. Furthermore, local attackers such as malicious insiders or users with physical access could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges or implant persistent malicious code. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the vulnerability should be addressed proactively. The medium severity rating reflects moderate risk, but the potential for lateral movement or further exploitation elevates concern in sensitive environments. European organizations with BYOD policies including TECNO devices or those in sectors with high security requirements should prioritize mitigation.

CWE-863Incorrect Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #17OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

security.tecno.com/SRC/securityUpdates (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Dec 2025, 04:52 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-863

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats