VulnerabilityPublished 9 Dec 2025Updated 10 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-9614: PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification · Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value

Affects PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) SpecificationSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-9614, European organizations should: 1) Engage with hardware and firmware vendors to obtain updated PCIe IDE specification guidance and patches addressing re-keying and stream flushing procedures. 2) Review and update device firmware to ensure proper cryptographic stream flushing and key refresh on device rebinding events. 3) Implement strict monitoring of PCIe device reinitialization events and audit logs for anomalous write transactions that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Segment networks and enforce strict access controls to limit cross-domain data flows, reducing the impact of potential data leakage. 5) Incorporate PCIe device security validation into regular security assessments and penetration testing to detect improper handling of integrity checks. 6) Maintain up-to-date asset inventories to identify devices using vulnerable PCIe IDE implementations and prioritize remediation accordingly. 7) Collaborate with industry groups and standards bodies to track specification updates and best practices for PCIe IDE security. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on specification-level compliance, vendor coordination, and operational monitoring specific to PCIe IDE vulnerabilities.

Description

An issue was discovered in the PCI Express (PCIe) Integrity and Data Encryption (IDE) specification, where insufficient guidance on re-keying and stream flushing during device rebinding may allow stale write transactions from a previous security context to be processed in a new one. This can lead to unintended data access across trusted domains, compromising confidentiality and integrity.

Impact

For European organizations, the vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data access across trusted domains within systems that utilize PCIe IDE-compliant devices. This is particularly critical for sectors handling sensitive or classified information, such as finance, telecommunications, government, and critical infrastructure. Confidentiality breaches could lead to data leaks or intellectual property theft, while integrity violations might result in corrupted data or unauthorized modifications. Although availability is not affected, the trustworthiness of data and system security is compromised. Organizations relying on hardware platforms with PCIe IDE implementations—such as servers, network equipment, and high-performance computing devices—are at risk. The medium severity suggests a moderate but non-trivial threat, especially in environments where multiple security domains coexist and strict data separation is required. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation before active attacks emerge.

CWE-354Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: Medium
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
Implementation
Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
REST Security (opens in a new tab)
JSON Web Token for Java (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V11.1.7 (opens in a new tab)
V13.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
V3.5.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Checksum Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
Padding Oracle Crypto Attack (opens in a new tab)
Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 16 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-354

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats