CVE-2025-9626: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in softwud Page Blocks
The Page Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_process_widget_page_change function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify widget page block configurations via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-9626 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the Page Blocks plugin for WordPress, developed by softwud. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.1.0 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the admin_process_widget_page_change function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent unauthorized actions. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an attacker to craft a malicious request that, if executed by an authenticated administrator (via clicking a specially crafted link), can modify widget page block configurations without the administrator's intent. This type of attack exploits the trust a web application places in the user's browser and session. The vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making exploitation less straightforward. The impact primarily affects the integrity of the site’s widget configurations, potentially leading to unauthorized content or layout changes, which could be leveraged for further attacks such as phishing or defacement. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (medium severity) reflects the network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction and limited impact on confidentiality and availability. No patches or exploits are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized modifications of WordPress site widget configurations, potentially undermining the integrity and trustworthiness of corporate websites or intranet portals. While it does not directly compromise sensitive data confidentiality or site availability, altered widget content could be used to inject misleading information, malicious links, or advertisements, damaging brand reputation and user trust. Organizations relying on WordPress for customer-facing or internal communications may face reputational harm or indirect security risks if attackers leverage the altered widgets for phishing or malware distribution. The requirement for administrator interaction reduces the likelihood of widespread automated exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with less security awareness or where administrators frequently access untrusted links. Given the widespread use of WordPress across Europe, particularly in small and medium enterprises, this vulnerability could have a broad impact if unmitigated.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves updating the Page Blocks plugin to a version that includes proper nonce validation once available from the vendor. 2. Until a patch is released, implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests targeting the admin_process_widget_page_change endpoint. 3. Educate WordPress administrators on the risks of clicking untrusted links, especially when logged into administrative accounts. 4. Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or via VPN to reduce exposure to CSRF attacks. 5. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the sources of executable scripts and reduce the risk of malicious link exploitation. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and configurations for security best practices, including nonce implementation. 7. Monitor logs for unusual administrative actions or configuration changes to detect potential exploitation attempts early.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-9626: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in softwud Page Blocks
Description
The Page Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_process_widget_page_change function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify widget page block configurations via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-9626 is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability identified in the Page Blocks plugin for WordPress, developed by softwud. This vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.1.0 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the admin_process_widget_page_change function. Nonces in WordPress are security tokens used to verify that requests originate from legitimate users and prevent unauthorized actions. The absence or improper implementation of nonce validation allows an attacker to craft a malicious request that, if executed by an authenticated administrator (via clicking a specially crafted link), can modify widget page block configurations without the administrator's intent. This type of attack exploits the trust a web application places in the user's browser and session. The vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but does require user interaction from an administrator, making exploitation less straightforward. The impact primarily affects the integrity of the site’s widget configurations, potentially leading to unauthorized content or layout changes, which could be leveraged for further attacks such as phishing or defacement. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (medium severity) reflects the network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but requiring user interaction and limited impact on confidentiality and availability. No patches or exploits are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized modifications of WordPress site widget configurations, potentially undermining the integrity and trustworthiness of corporate websites or intranet portals. While it does not directly compromise sensitive data confidentiality or site availability, altered widget content could be used to inject misleading information, malicious links, or advertisements, damaging brand reputation and user trust. Organizations relying on WordPress for customer-facing or internal communications may face reputational harm or indirect security risks if attackers leverage the altered widgets for phishing or malware distribution. The requirement for administrator interaction reduces the likelihood of widespread automated exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments with less security awareness or where administrators frequently access untrusted links. Given the widespread use of WordPress across Europe, particularly in small and medium enterprises, this vulnerability could have a broad impact if unmitigated.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves updating the Page Blocks plugin to a version that includes proper nonce validation once available from the vendor. 2. Until a patch is released, implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious POST requests targeting the admin_process_widget_page_change endpoint. 3. Educate WordPress administrators on the risks of clicking untrusted links, especially when logged into administrative accounts. 4. Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or via VPN to reduce exposure to CSRF attacks. 5. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the sources of executable scripts and reduce the risk of malicious link exploitation. 6. Regularly audit WordPress plugins and configurations for security best practices, including nonce implementation. 7. Monitor logs for unusual administrative actions or configuration changes to detect potential exploitation attempts early.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-28T19:19:01.503Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68ea263e5baaa01f1ca0fffd
Added to database: 10/11/2025, 9:41:18 AM
Last enriched: 10/19/2025, 12:53:23 AM
Last updated: 11/30/2025, 7:03:16 AM
Views: 19
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-13783: SQL Injection in taosir WTCMS
MediumCVE-2025-66433: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in wisc HTCondor
MediumCVE-2025-66432: CWE-420 Unprotected Alternate Channel in Oxide Omicron
MediumCVE-2025-13782: SQL Injection in taosir WTCMS
MediumCVE-2025-66424: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in Tryton trytond
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.