CVE-2025-9652VulnerabilityPublished 29 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-9652: Portabilis i-Educar · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Portabilis i-EducarSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Portabilis i-Educar	Affected =2.0 =2.1 =2.2 =2.3 =2.4 =2.5 =2.6 =2.7 =2.8 =2.9 =2.10	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should prioritize the following actions: 1) Apply patches or updates from Portabilis as soon as they become available to address the input validation flaws in the affected PHP file. 2) Implement robust input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially for parameters like 'nm_tipo' and 'desc_tipo', to prevent script injection. 3) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers. 4) Conduct security awareness training for users to recognize and avoid phishing attempts that could trigger the XSS exploit. 5) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block common XSS attack patterns targeting the i-Educar application. 6) Regularly audit and monitor web application logs for suspicious activities indicative of attempted XSS exploitation. 7) If patching is delayed, consider temporarily disabling or restricting access to the vulnerable component or page to reduce exposure. These measures, combined, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation beyond generic advice.

Description

A vulnerability was determined in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /intranet/educar_transferencia_tipo_cad.php of the component Cadastrar tipo de transferência Page. This manipulation of the argument nm_tipo/desc_tipo causes cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on the adoption of Portabilis i-Educar within their educational institutions. While i-Educar is primarily popular in Brazil, any European entities using this platform or similar versions could face risks including unauthorized access to session tokens, user impersonation, and potential data theft or manipulation. The exploitation of this XSS vulnerability could lead to compromised user accounts, leakage of sensitive educational data, and erosion of trust in the affected institutions. Additionally, attackers could use the vulnerability as a foothold to conduct further attacks within the network. The medium severity score suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it still poses a significant risk, especially in environments where sensitive personal data is handled. European data protection regulations such as GDPR impose strict requirements on data security; thus, exploitation could lead to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. The requirement for user interaction means social engineering or phishing campaigns could be used to trigger the exploit, increasing the attack surface.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 5 Sep 2025, 20:37 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats