VulnerabilityPublished 13 Jan 2026

CVE-2026-0513: SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SICF Handler in SRM Catalog) · URL Redirection to Untrusted Site

Affects SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SICF Handler in SRM Catalog)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.7 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.7Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 10% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SAP_SESAP Supplier Relationship Management (SICF Handler in SRM Catalog)	Affected 701 – 714 4 affected builds	Fixed in–
Sap_sesap_se/sap_supplier_relationship_management`pkg:deb/sap_se/sap_supplier_relationship_management`Other threats	Affected 701 – 714 4 affected builds	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Implement strict validation and whitelisting of redirect URLs within the SAP SRM SICF Handler configuration to ensure only trusted internal URLs are allowed for redirection.
Apply SAP security notes and patches as they become available for the affected SRM versions; monitor SAP security advisories closely.
Configure web application firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block suspicious redirect patterns or external URLs in SRM traffic.
Conduct user awareness training focused on phishing and social engineering risks, emphasizing caution with URLs received via email or external sources.
Monitor logs for unusual redirect requests or spikes in traffic to external domains originating from SAP SRM portals.
Consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) on SAP SRM access to reduce the impact of credential theft resulting from phishing.
Review and restrict public exposure of SAP SRM interfaces to minimize attack surface, using VPNs or secure gateways where possible.
Collaborate with suppliers and partners to share threat intelligence and ensure consistent security postures across the supply chain.

Description

Due to an Open Redirect Vulnerability in SAP Supplier Relationship Management (SICF Handler in SRM Catalog), an unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious URL that, if accessed by a victim, redirects them to an attacker-controlled site.This causes low impact on integrity of the application. Confidentiality and availability are not impacted.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those heavily reliant on SAP SRM for procurement and supplier management, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily through social engineering and phishing attacks. Attackers can exploit the open redirect to craft convincing URLs that appear to originate from trusted SAP portals, increasing the likelihood of users clicking malicious links. This can lead to credential compromise or malware infections if users are redirected to malicious sites. While the vulnerability does not directly compromise data confidentiality or system availability, the indirect consequences can include reputational damage, loss of supplier trust, and potential financial fraud. Organizations in sectors with complex supply chains, such as manufacturing, automotive, pharmaceuticals, and retail, may face higher risks due to the criticality of SAP SRM in their operations. Additionally, the cross-site nature of the redirect can facilitate broader attack campaigns targeting multiple organizations or partners within the European supply ecosystem.

CWE-601URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: LowOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design
Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
Architecture and Design · Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.1.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Cross-Site Flashing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 13 Jan 2026, 01:58 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-601

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats