Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-0807: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in wpmessiah Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-0807cvecve-2026-0807cwe-918
Published: Sat Jan 24 2026 (01/24/2026, 07:26:41 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: wpmessiah
Product: Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor

Description

The Frontis Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to insufficient restriction on the 'url' parameter in the 'template_proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoint.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/31/2026, 08:59:14 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-0807 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability classified under CWE-918, found in the Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor WordPress plugin developed by wpmessiah. This vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 1.1.6. The root cause is insufficient restriction and validation of the 'url' parameter within the 'template_proxy' function. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to abuse the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints to make arbitrary HTTP requests originating from the vulnerable web server. SSRF vulnerabilities enable attackers to interact with internal systems that are otherwise inaccessible externally, potentially leading to information disclosure, internal network scanning, or leveraging the server as a proxy for further attacks. The vulnerability does not require any authentication or user interaction, increasing its exploitability. The CVSS v3.1 score is 7.2 (high severity), reflecting the network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and impacts on confidentiality and integrity but not availability. Although no known exploits have been reported in the wild, the vulnerability's presence in a popular WordPress plugin makes it a significant risk for websites using this plugin. The lack of available patches at the time of reporting necessitates immediate mitigation efforts by administrators.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, exploitation of this SSRF vulnerability could lead to unauthorized internal network reconnaissance, exposing sensitive internal services and data. Attackers could use the vulnerable WordPress plugin to pivot into internal systems, bypassing perimeter defenses. This could result in leakage of confidential information, compromise of internal APIs, or further exploitation chains leading to data breaches. Given the widespread use of WordPress across European businesses, government websites, and public institutions, the impact could be broad, affecting sectors such as finance, healthcare, and public administration. Additionally, the ability to make arbitrary requests from the server could be leveraged to bypass IP-based access controls or to perform denial-of-service attacks against internal or third-party systems. The high severity rating underscores the potential for significant confidentiality and integrity impacts, which could damage organizational reputation and lead to regulatory penalties under GDPR if personal data is exposed.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediately update the Frontis Blocks plugin to a patched version once available from the vendor. 2. Until a patch is released, restrict access to the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints using web application firewalls (WAFs) or server-level access controls to block unauthenticated requests. 3. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'url' parameter to ensure only allowed domains or IP ranges can be requested, ideally whitelisting trusted URLs. 4. Monitor web server logs for unusual outbound HTTP requests originating from these endpoints, which may indicate exploitation attempts. 5. Employ network segmentation to limit the web server's ability to reach sensitive internal resources. 6. Use security plugins or modules that detect and block SSRF attempts. 7. Educate site administrators about the risks and signs of SSRF exploitation. 8. Conduct regular vulnerability scans and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and related web application vulnerabilities.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
Wordfence
Date Reserved
2026-01-09T14:24:31.880Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 6974765f4623b1157ca739a2

Added to database: 1/24/2026, 7:35:59 AM

Last enriched: 1/31/2026, 8:59:14 AM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 4:04:14 AM

Views: 42

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats