CVE-2026-0807: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in wpmessiah Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor
The Frontis Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to insufficient restriction on the 'url' parameter in the 'template_proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoint.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-0807 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor WordPress plugin, developed by wpmessiah. The vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.1.6 due to insufficient restrictions on the 'url' parameter within the 'template_proxy' function. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to craft HTTP requests that the vulnerable server will execute, targeting arbitrary URLs via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints. SSRF vulnerabilities enable attackers to make the server perform requests on their behalf, potentially accessing internal or protected resources that are not directly reachable from the outside. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 7.2 (high severity), reflecting network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), scope changed (S:C), and limited confidentiality and integrity impacts (C:L, I:L), with no availability impact (A:N). Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's characteristics make it a significant risk, especially in environments where the plugin is widely deployed. The SSRF can be leveraged for internal network reconnaissance, accessing metadata services, or exploiting other internal services, potentially leading to further compromise. The lack of authentication requirement and ease of exploitation increase the urgency for remediation. No official patches have been linked yet, so mitigation may require temporary workarounds or disabling the affected endpoints until updates are available.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-0807 is unauthorized internal network access and information disclosure. Attackers can use the SSRF flaw to send crafted requests from the vulnerable WordPress server to internal systems, potentially bypassing firewall restrictions and accessing sensitive internal services such as databases, cloud metadata endpoints, or administrative interfaces. This can lead to reconnaissance that facilitates further attacks, including privilege escalation or lateral movement within an organization's network. The vulnerability affects the confidentiality and integrity of data by exposing internal resources and possibly manipulating responses. Although availability is not directly impacted, the SSRF could be a stepping stone for more severe attacks. Organizations running the affected plugin on publicly accessible WordPress sites are at risk of external attackers exploiting this flaw without authentication or user interaction, increasing the attack surface. The widespread use of WordPress globally, combined with the popularity of block editor plugins, means a large number of websites could be vulnerable, potentially impacting businesses, government agencies, and other institutions relying on WordPress for their web presence.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include disabling or restricting access to the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints via web server configuration or firewall rules to prevent exploitation until a patch is available. 2. Monitor web server logs for unusual or suspicious requests targeting these endpoints, especially those containing unexpected URLs in the 'url' parameter. 3. Implement network-level controls to limit outbound HTTP requests from the WordPress server to only trusted destinations, reducing the risk of SSRF exploitation. 4. If possible, apply input validation or sanitization on the 'url' parameter to restrict requests to known safe domains or IP ranges. 5. Keep WordPress core and all plugins updated; monitor the vendor's announcements for an official patch and apply it promptly once released. 6. Conduct internal network segmentation to minimize the impact of SSRF by isolating critical services from web-facing servers. 7. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block SSRF attack patterns targeting these endpoints. 8. Educate site administrators about the risk and encourage regular security audits of installed plugins and their configurations.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, India, Brazil, France, Netherlands, Japan
CVE-2026-0807: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in wpmessiah Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor
Description
The Frontis Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to insufficient restriction on the 'url' parameter in the 'template_proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoint.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-0807 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Frontis Blocks — Block Library for the Block Editor WordPress plugin, developed by wpmessiah. The vulnerability exists in all versions up to and including 1.1.6 due to insufficient restrictions on the 'url' parameter within the 'template_proxy' function. This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to craft HTTP requests that the vulnerable server will execute, targeting arbitrary URLs via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints. SSRF vulnerabilities enable attackers to make the server perform requests on their behalf, potentially accessing internal or protected resources that are not directly reachable from the outside. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 7.2 (high severity), reflecting network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), scope changed (S:C), and limited confidentiality and integrity impacts (C:L, I:L), with no availability impact (A:N). Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's characteristics make it a significant risk, especially in environments where the plugin is widely deployed. The SSRF can be leveraged for internal network reconnaissance, accessing metadata services, or exploiting other internal services, potentially leading to further compromise. The lack of authentication requirement and ease of exploitation increase the urgency for remediation. No official patches have been linked yet, so mitigation may require temporary workarounds or disabling the affected endpoints until updates are available.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-0807 is unauthorized internal network access and information disclosure. Attackers can use the SSRF flaw to send crafted requests from the vulnerable WordPress server to internal systems, potentially bypassing firewall restrictions and accessing sensitive internal services such as databases, cloud metadata endpoints, or administrative interfaces. This can lead to reconnaissance that facilitates further attacks, including privilege escalation or lateral movement within an organization's network. The vulnerability affects the confidentiality and integrity of data by exposing internal resources and possibly manipulating responses. Although availability is not directly impacted, the SSRF could be a stepping stone for more severe attacks. Organizations running the affected plugin on publicly accessible WordPress sites are at risk of external attackers exploiting this flaw without authentication or user interaction, increasing the attack surface. The widespread use of WordPress globally, combined with the popularity of block editor plugins, means a large number of websites could be vulnerable, potentially impacting businesses, government agencies, and other institutions relying on WordPress for their web presence.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include disabling or restricting access to the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoints via web server configuration or firewall rules to prevent exploitation until a patch is available. 2. Monitor web server logs for unusual or suspicious requests targeting these endpoints, especially those containing unexpected URLs in the 'url' parameter. 3. Implement network-level controls to limit outbound HTTP requests from the WordPress server to only trusted destinations, reducing the risk of SSRF exploitation. 4. If possible, apply input validation or sanitization on the 'url' parameter to restrict requests to known safe domains or IP ranges. 5. Keep WordPress core and all plugins updated; monitor the vendor's announcements for an official patch and apply it promptly once released. 6. Conduct internal network segmentation to minimize the impact of SSRF by isolating critical services from web-facing servers. 7. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block SSRF attack patterns targeting these endpoints. 8. Educate site administrators about the risk and encourage regular security audits of installed plugins and their configurations.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-09T14:24:31.880Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6974765f4623b1157ca739a2
Added to database: 1/24/2026, 7:35:59 AM
Last enriched: 2/26/2026, 6:41:21 PM
Last updated: 3/24/2026, 1:02:26 AM
Views: 73
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.