Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-110021: Phoenix Contact PLCnext Engineer · Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Affects Phoenix Contact PLCnext EngineerSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to 2026.6 when convenient.

Data as of 4 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
6.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
CVSS scores by source
CNA (CERTVDE)CVSS 4.06.9
CNA (CERTVDE)CVSS 3.16.2
Patch
Available – fixed in 2026.6
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 4 Nov 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 3 Nov 2026.

What to do

Upgrade Phoenix Contact PLCnext Engineer to 2026.6.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Phoenix ContactPLCnext EngineerAffected
  • <2026.6
Fixed in
  • 2026.6

AI-suggested

A fixed version 2026.6 of PLCnext Engineer is available that addresses this vulnerability. Users should upgrade to version 2026.6 or later to ensure proper cryptographic verification of GSDML manifest signatures. No other mitigation is indicated or required according to the vendor advisory.

Description

CVE-2026-110021 is a vulnerability in Phoenix Contact PLCnext Engineer prior to version 2026.6 where the software improperly verifies cryptographic signatures on GSDML device description packages. The software checks manifest reference digests but does not verify the XML SignatureValue cryptographically, allowing an unauthenticated local attacker to modify signed content and have it accepted as valid. This can lead to importing tampered device descriptions under the default policy.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…