CVE-2026-1121VulnerabilityPublished 18 Jan 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-1121: Yonyou KSOA · SQL Injection

Affects Yonyou KSOASource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 42% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
YonyouKSOA	Affected =9.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:yonyou:ksoa:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately implement the following mitigations: 1) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block malicious SQL injection payloads targeting the 'ID' parameter in /worksheet/del_workplan.jsp requests. 2) Restrict direct internet access to the affected application components by using network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters, especially the 'ID' parameter, to prevent injection attacks. 4) Monitor application logs and network traffic for unusual query patterns or repeated access attempts to the vulnerable endpoint. 5) If possible, disable or restrict the vulnerable functionality until a vendor patch or official fix is available. 6) Engage with Yonyou support channels persistently to obtain official remediation guidance or patches. 7) Consider deploying database-level protections such as least privilege accounts and query parameterization to reduce injection impact. 8) Prepare incident response plans to quickly address potential exploitation events.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Yonyou KSOA 9.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /worksheet/del_workplan.jsp of the component HTTP GET Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

Exploitation of this SQL injection vulnerability can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data, data manipulation, or deletion within the affected Yonyou KSOA systems. Attackers could extract confidential business information, modify workplan data, or disrupt service availability. Given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the exploit, attackers can operate stealthily and at scale, potentially compromising multiple organizational assets. This can result in financial losses, reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and operational disruptions. Organizations with critical workflows managed by Yonyou KSOA 9.0 are particularly at risk, especially if the application interfaces with sensitive or regulated data. The lack of vendor response and patch availability further exacerbates the threat landscape, increasing exposure time.

Summary

CVE-2026-1121 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in Yonyou KSOA 9.0, specifically within the /worksheet/del_workplan.jsp component. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization of the 'ID' parameter in HTTP GET requests, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL queries. This injection flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring authentication or user interaction, making it accessible to a wide range of threat actors. The vulnerability affects the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the underlying database and application data. The vendor was notified but has not issued a patch or response, and public exploit code has been released, increasing the likelihood of exploitation. The CVSS v4.0 score is 6.9 (medium severity), reflecting the ease of exploitation and potential impact. The absence of authentication and user interaction requirements combined with the ability to manipulate backend SQL queries makes this a significant risk for organizations relying on Yonyou KSOA 9.0 for business operations.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…