Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-1237: Canonical juju · Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release

Affects Canonical jujuSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.1 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
2.1Low
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 3% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 28 Jan 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
CanonicaljujuAffected
  • =0
Fixed in–
GitHubjuju/jujupkg:github/juju/jujuOther threatsAffected
  • =0
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Given the absence of an official patch, European organizations should implement compensating controls. First, restrict database record modification privileges strictly to trusted administrators and monitor for unauthorized changes. Implement robust auditing and alerting on database updates related to authorization tokens. Limit charm deployment and cross-model relations to trusted sources and minimize the number of charms with cross-model permissions. Employ network segmentation and access controls to reduce the attack surface for malicious users. Regularly review and revoke unnecessary permissions proactively. Consider isolating critical workloads to prevent unauthorized charm interactions. Engage with Canonical for updates and apply patches promptly once available. Additionally, conduct internal penetration testing focusing on juju authorization mechanisms to identify potential exploitation paths.

Description

Vulnerable cross-model authorization in juju. If a charm's cross-model permissions are revoked or expire, a malicious user who is able to update database records can mint an invalid macaroon that is incorrectly validated by the juju controller, enabling a charm to maintain otherwise revoked or expired permissions. This allows a charm to continue relating to another charm in a cross-model relation, and use their workload without their permission. No fix is available as of the time of writing.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…