CVE-2026-1625VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-1625: D-Link DWR-M961 · Command Injection

Affects D-Link DWR-M961Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 2.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 87% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
D-LinkDWR-M961	Affected =1.1.47	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-1625 effectively, organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Immediately restrict access to the router's management interfaces, especially the SMS management component, by limiting access to trusted IP addresses and disabling remote management over the internet if not required. 2) Disable the SMS message management feature entirely if it is not in use to eliminate the attack surface. 3) Employ network segmentation to isolate the router from critical internal networks, reducing the impact of a compromised device. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual command execution patterns or unexpected outbound connections originating from the router. 5) Implement strict firewall rules to block unauthorized inbound traffic targeting the router's management ports. 6) Regularly audit device firmware versions and configurations to ensure compliance with security best practices. 7) Engage with D-Link support channels to obtain information on forthcoming patches or firmware updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. 8) Consider deploying intrusion detection or prevention systems capable of recognizing exploitation attempts targeting this vulnerability. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable component and attack vector.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DWR-M961 1.1.47. The impacted element is the function sub_4250E0 of the file /boafrm/formSmsManage of the component SMS Message. Performing a manipulation of the argument action_value results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Impact

The impact of CVE-2026-1625 is significant for organizations relying on the D-Link DWR-M961 router. Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the device without authentication, compromising device integrity and availability. Attackers could disrupt network connectivity, intercept or alter network traffic, or use the compromised router as a foothold for further attacks within the internal network. This can lead to data breaches, service outages, and loss of control over critical network infrastructure. Given the router's role in managing SMS messages, attackers might also exploit this vector to manipulate communication or trigger additional attacks. The public availability of the exploit increases the risk of widespread attacks, especially in environments where the device is exposed to untrusted networks. Organizations with limited network segmentation or weak perimeter defenses are particularly vulnerable. The medium CVSS score reflects partial impact and some attack complexity, but the lack of authentication and user interaction requirements elevate the threat level. Without timely mitigation, this vulnerability could be leveraged for espionage, sabotage, or ransomware delivery.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Feb 2026, 21:49 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats