VulnerabilityPublished 8 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-2193: D-Link DI-7100G C1 · Command Injection

Affects D-Link DI-7100G C1Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 3.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 90% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
D-LinkDI-7100G C1	Affected =24.04.18D1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-2193, organizations should first verify if their D-Link DI-7100G C1 devices run the vulnerable firmware version 24.04.18D1. If so, they should monitor D-Link's official channels for firmware updates or patches addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available. In the absence of patches, network administrators should restrict access to device management interfaces by implementing network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure to trusted networks only. Employing intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious payloads targeting the usb_username parameter can reduce exploitation risk. Disabling unnecessary services or remote management features on the device can further minimize the attack surface. Regularly auditing device configurations and logs for anomalous activity related to command injection attempts is recommended. Additionally, organizations should consider replacing outdated or unsupported devices with newer models that follow secure development practices and receive timely security updates.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DI-7100G C1 24.04.18D1. Affected by this issue is the function set_jhttpd_info. Performing a manipulation of the argument usb_username results in command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-2193 is unauthorized command execution on affected D-Link DI-7100G C1 devices, which can compromise device confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Attackers could leverage this to execute arbitrary commands, potentially gaining control over the device, altering configurations, or disrupting network services. This could lead to network outages, interception or manipulation of network traffic, or pivoting attacks into internal networks. Organizations relying on these routers for critical connectivity or security functions may experience degraded network reliability and increased risk of data breaches. Although the vulnerability requires no authentication, the medium severity score suggests some limitations in the extent of damage, possibly due to privilege restrictions or partial impact on system components. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate widespread risk but does not eliminate the threat of future exploitation. The vulnerability is particularly concerning for environments where these devices are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet, increasing the likelihood of remote attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Feb 2026, 21:04 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats