CVE-2026-22608: CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs in trailofbits fickling
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, both ctypes and pydoc modules aren't explicitly blocked. Even other existing pickle scanning tools (like picklescan) do not block pydoc.locate. Chaining these two together can achieve RCE while the scanner still reports the file as LIKELY_SAFE. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-22608 identifies a critical security flaw in the Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer tool called fickling, developed by trailofbits. The vulnerability arises from an incomplete list of disallowed inputs in versions prior to 0.1.7, specifically the failure to block the ctypes and pydoc modules. These modules can be leveraged by attackers to bypass security checks and achieve remote code execution (RCE) by chaining pydoc.locate with ctypes, a technique that existing pickle scanning tools like picklescan also fail to detect. Pickle is a Python serialization format that can execute arbitrary code during deserialization if malicious payloads are present. Fickling’s role is to analyze pickle files safely, but this vulnerability undermines its security guarantees by allowing dangerous modules to pass through unchecked. The issue is classified under CWE-184 (Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs) and CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data), highlighting the risks of improper input validation and unsafe deserialization. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.9, indicating high severity with network attack vector, no required privileges or user interaction, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no exploits have been observed in the wild yet, the potential for stealthy RCE attacks exists, especially in environments relying on fickling or similar tools for security analysis of pickle data. The patch in version 0.1.7 explicitly blocks these modules, mitigating the risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk especially for those involved in Python development, security research, or malware analysis where pickle files are analyzed using fickling or similar tools. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution without authentication or user interaction, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, compromise systems, steal sensitive data, or disrupt services. This can impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. Organizations using fickling as part of their security toolchain may be misled by false negatives, increasing exposure to malicious pickle payloads. The risk extends to sectors with high reliance on Python tooling such as finance, telecommunications, technology, and research institutions. Given the ease of exploitation and the stealthy nature of the attack chain, the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks or supply chain compromises. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently provides a window for proactive mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade fickling to version 0.1.7 or later to ensure the vulnerability is patched. Additionally, they should audit their use of pickle scanning tools and consider supplementing fickling with other security controls that explicitly block or sandbox dangerous modules like ctypes and pydoc. Implement strict input validation and restrict deserialization of untrusted pickle data wherever possible. Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection to identify suspicious pickle deserialization activities. Security teams should update threat detection rules to account for this vulnerability and educate developers on the risks of unsafe deserialization. For environments where upgrading is delayed, consider isolating pickle analysis in restricted containers or virtual machines to limit potential damage from exploitation. Regularly review and update security policies regarding the use of serialization formats and associated tooling. Finally, maintain awareness of any emerging exploits or attack campaigns leveraging this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Ireland
CVE-2026-22608: CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs in trailofbits fickling
Description
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, both ctypes and pydoc modules aren't explicitly blocked. Even other existing pickle scanning tools (like picklescan) do not block pydoc.locate. Chaining these two together can achieve RCE while the scanner still reports the file as LIKELY_SAFE. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-22608 identifies a critical security flaw in the Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer tool called fickling, developed by trailofbits. The vulnerability arises from an incomplete list of disallowed inputs in versions prior to 0.1.7, specifically the failure to block the ctypes and pydoc modules. These modules can be leveraged by attackers to bypass security checks and achieve remote code execution (RCE) by chaining pydoc.locate with ctypes, a technique that existing pickle scanning tools like picklescan also fail to detect. Pickle is a Python serialization format that can execute arbitrary code during deserialization if malicious payloads are present. Fickling’s role is to analyze pickle files safely, but this vulnerability undermines its security guarantees by allowing dangerous modules to pass through unchecked. The issue is classified under CWE-184 (Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs) and CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data), highlighting the risks of improper input validation and unsafe deserialization. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.9, indicating high severity with network attack vector, no required privileges or user interaction, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although no exploits have been observed in the wild yet, the potential for stealthy RCE attacks exists, especially in environments relying on fickling or similar tools for security analysis of pickle data. The patch in version 0.1.7 explicitly blocks these modules, mitigating the risk.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk especially for those involved in Python development, security research, or malware analysis where pickle files are analyzed using fickling or similar tools. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution without authentication or user interaction, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, compromise systems, steal sensitive data, or disrupt services. This can impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. Organizations using fickling as part of their security toolchain may be misled by false negatives, increasing exposure to malicious pickle payloads. The risk extends to sectors with high reliance on Python tooling such as finance, telecommunications, technology, and research institutions. Given the ease of exploitation and the stealthy nature of the attack chain, the vulnerability could be leveraged in targeted attacks or supply chain compromises. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently provides a window for proactive mitigation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade fickling to version 0.1.7 or later to ensure the vulnerability is patched. Additionally, they should audit their use of pickle scanning tools and consider supplementing fickling with other security controls that explicitly block or sandbox dangerous modules like ctypes and pydoc. Implement strict input validation and restrict deserialization of untrusted pickle data wherever possible. Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection to identify suspicious pickle deserialization activities. Security teams should update threat detection rules to account for this vulnerability and educate developers on the risks of unsafe deserialization. For environments where upgrading is delayed, consider isolating pickle analysis in restricted containers or virtual machines to limit potential damage from exploitation. Regularly review and update security policies regarding the use of serialization formats and associated tooling. Finally, maintain awareness of any emerging exploits or attack campaigns leveraging this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-07T21:50:39.534Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6961b006ed32c7f018eb8ffd
Added to database: 1/10/2026, 1:48:54 AM
Last enriched: 1/10/2026, 1:59:49 AM
Last updated: 1/10/2026, 7:22:54 PM
Views: 19
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-0824: Cross Site Scripting in questdb ui
MediumCVE-2025-13393: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in marceljm Featured Image from URL (FIFU)
MediumCVE-2025-12379: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in averta Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme
MediumCVE-2026-0822: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in quickjs-ng quickjs
MediumCVE-2026-0821: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in quickjs-ng quickjs
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.