CVE-2026-22609: CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs in trailofbits fickling
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, the unsafe_imports() method in Fickling's static analyzer fails to flag several high-risk Python modules that can be used for arbitrary code execution. Malicious pickles importing these modules will not be detected as unsafe, allowing attackers to bypass Fickling's primary static safety checks. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer designed to inspect pickle files for unsafe imports that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Prior to version 0.1.7, its unsafe_imports() method had an incomplete list of disallowed modules, failing to detect several high-risk Python modules that attackers can exploit. Pickle files are a known vector for code execution attacks because they can serialize and deserialize arbitrary Python objects, including those that execute code upon loading. Fickling’s static analysis aims to identify unsafe imports to prevent this risk. However, the incomplete blacklist allowed malicious pickle files importing these overlooked modules to bypass detection, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems analyzing these pickles. The vulnerability is significant because it requires no authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely by submitting crafted pickle files to systems using vulnerable Fickling versions. The issue was patched in version 0.1.7 by expanding the list of disallowed imports, closing this bypass vector. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 indicates a high-severity vulnerability with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild yet, but the potential for exploitation is high given the nature of pickle deserialization attacks. Organizations using Fickling in their security analysis pipelines or development environments should prioritize upgrading and reviewing their handling of pickle files to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk especially to those involved in software development, security research, and incident response where Fickling might be used to analyze pickle files. Exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution on systems processing malicious pickle files, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. This could result in unauthorized data access, system takeover, or disruption of services. Since pickle files are commonly used in Python environments, organizations relying on automated analysis tools like Fickling without additional safeguards may be exposed. The vulnerability’s network vector and lack of required privileges mean attackers can exploit it remotely without authentication, increasing risk. Critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and technology companies in Europe that use Python-based tooling are particularly vulnerable. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high CVSS score underscores the urgency. Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to supply chain attacks or compromise of internal development environments, with cascading effects on software integrity and trust.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately upgrade Fickling to version 0.1.7 or later where the unsafe_imports() method has been corrected to include all high-risk modules. 2. Avoid processing untrusted pickle files with Fickling or any other pickle analysis tool without additional sandboxing or isolation controls. 3. Implement strict input validation and filtering on any systems that accept pickle files, limiting sources to trusted entities only. 4. Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection to identify suspicious activity related to pickle deserialization. 5. Review and harden development and CI/CD pipelines that use pickle files to ensure they do not rely solely on static analysis tools for security. 6. Educate developers and security teams about the risks of pickle deserialization and the importance of using safe serialization alternatives where possible. 7. Consider adopting alternative serialization formats (e.g., JSON, protobuf) that do not allow arbitrary code execution. 8. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on deserialization vulnerabilities in Python environments. 9. Maintain up-to-date threat intelligence feeds to monitor for any emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability. 10. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and strict access controls around systems using Fickling.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2026-22609: CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs in trailofbits fickling
Description
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, the unsafe_imports() method in Fickling's static analyzer fails to flag several high-risk Python modules that can be used for arbitrary code execution. Malicious pickles importing these modules will not be detected as unsafe, allowing attackers to bypass Fickling's primary static safety checks. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer designed to inspect pickle files for unsafe imports that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Prior to version 0.1.7, its unsafe_imports() method had an incomplete list of disallowed modules, failing to detect several high-risk Python modules that attackers can exploit. Pickle files are a known vector for code execution attacks because they can serialize and deserialize arbitrary Python objects, including those that execute code upon loading. Fickling’s static analysis aims to identify unsafe imports to prevent this risk. However, the incomplete blacklist allowed malicious pickle files importing these overlooked modules to bypass detection, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems analyzing these pickles. The vulnerability is significant because it requires no authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely by submitting crafted pickle files to systems using vulnerable Fickling versions. The issue was patched in version 0.1.7 by expanding the list of disallowed imports, closing this bypass vector. The CVSS 4.0 score of 8.9 indicates a high-severity vulnerability with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild yet, but the potential for exploitation is high given the nature of pickle deserialization attacks. Organizations using Fickling in their security analysis pipelines or development environments should prioritize upgrading and reviewing their handling of pickle files to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk especially to those involved in software development, security research, and incident response where Fickling might be used to analyze pickle files. Exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution on systems processing malicious pickle files, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. This could result in unauthorized data access, system takeover, or disruption of services. Since pickle files are commonly used in Python environments, organizations relying on automated analysis tools like Fickling without additional safeguards may be exposed. The vulnerability’s network vector and lack of required privileges mean attackers can exploit it remotely without authentication, increasing risk. Critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and technology companies in Europe that use Python-based tooling are particularly vulnerable. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high CVSS score underscores the urgency. Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to supply chain attacks or compromise of internal development environments, with cascading effects on software integrity and trust.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately upgrade Fickling to version 0.1.7 or later where the unsafe_imports() method has been corrected to include all high-risk modules. 2. Avoid processing untrusted pickle files with Fickling or any other pickle analysis tool without additional sandboxing or isolation controls. 3. Implement strict input validation and filtering on any systems that accept pickle files, limiting sources to trusted entities only. 4. Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection to identify suspicious activity related to pickle deserialization. 5. Review and harden development and CI/CD pipelines that use pickle files to ensure they do not rely solely on static analysis tools for security. 6. Educate developers and security teams about the risks of pickle deserialization and the importance of using safe serialization alternatives where possible. 7. Consider adopting alternative serialization formats (e.g., JSON, protobuf) that do not allow arbitrary code execution. 8. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on deserialization vulnerabilities in Python environments. 9. Maintain up-to-date threat intelligence feeds to monitor for any emerging exploits targeting this vulnerability. 10. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and strict access controls around systems using Fickling.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-01-07T21:50:39.534Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6961b006ed32c7f018eb9002
Added to database: 1/10/2026, 1:48:54 AM
Last enriched: 1/10/2026, 1:59:34 AM
Last updated: 1/10/2026, 8:19:31 PM
Views: 9
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-0824: Cross Site Scripting in questdb ui
MediumCVE-2025-13393: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in marceljm Featured Image from URL (FIFU)
MediumCVE-2025-12379: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in averta Shortcodes and extra features for Phlox theme
MediumCVE-2026-0822: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in quickjs-ng quickjs
MediumCVE-2026-0821: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in quickjs-ng quickjs
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.