Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-24663: Copeland XWEB 300D PRO · OS Command Injection

Affects Copeland XWEB 300D PROSource CVE Database V5

0
Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.0 Critical.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
9.0Critical
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
3.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 89% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 27 Feb 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
CopelandCopeland XWEB 300D PROAffected
  • <=1.12.1
Fixed in–
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500D PROAffected
  • <=1.12.1
Fixed in–
CopelandCopeland XWEB 500B PROAffected
  • <=1.12.1
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation steps include isolating affected Copeland XWEB 300D PRO devices from untrusted networks to reduce exposure. Network segmentation and strict firewall rules should be applied to limit access to the libraries installation route. Monitoring network traffic for unusual requests targeting this route can help detect exploitation attempts. Employing intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures for command injection patterns is recommended. Since no patches are currently available, organizations should engage with Copeland for updates or workarounds. Additionally, implementing application-layer gateways or reverse proxies to sanitize and validate incoming requests can reduce injection risks. Regular backups and incident response plans tailored for industrial control systems should be reviewed and tested. Finally, consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of identifying anomalous command execution on these devices.

Description

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by sending a crafted request to the libraries installation route and injecting malicious input into the request body.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…