CVE-2026-25811: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in Praskla-Technology assessment-placipy
CVE-2026-25811 is a medium-severity authorization vulnerability in PlaciPy version 1. 0. 0, a placement management system for educational institutions. The application derives tenant identifiers solely from the user's email domain without validating domain ownership, enabling unauthorized cross-tenant data access. This flaw allows an attacker to access data belonging to other tenants by exploiting the weak domain-based tenant identification. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication but does require low privileges. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the impact on confidentiality is significant, especially for institutions managing sensitive student placement data. European educational institutions using PlaciPy 1. 0. 0 are at risk, particularly in countries with high adoption of this software or large educational sectors.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-25811 is an authorization vulnerability classified under CWE-863 affecting PlaciPy version 1.0.0, a placement management system developed by Praskla-Technology for educational institutions. The core issue arises from the application's method of tenant identification: it derives the tenant ID directly from the email domain provided by users during login or registration without verifying if the user legitimately owns or controls that domain. This flawed logic allows an attacker to impersonate or claim a tenant identity simply by using an email address with a domain matching another tenant. Consequently, the attacker can gain unauthorized access to data belonging to other tenants, violating confidentiality boundaries. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network without requiring user interaction and only requires low privileges, making it relatively easy to exploit. The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 reflects a medium severity, primarily due to the limited scope of impact (tenant data leakage) and the absence of integrity or availability compromise. No patches or fixes are currently published, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. The vulnerability highlights a critical design flaw in multi-tenant SaaS applications where tenant isolation depends on unverified user input. Proper domain ownership validation, such as DNS verification or email confirmation workflows, is necessary to prevent unauthorized cross-tenant access.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-25811 is unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data across tenants in the PlaciPy system. For European educational institutions, this could mean exposure of student placement records, personal information, and institutional data to unauthorized parties, potentially violating GDPR and other data protection regulations. The breach of confidentiality can undermine trust in the affected institutions and lead to legal and reputational consequences. Since the vulnerability allows cross-tenant data access without authentication, attackers could systematically harvest data from multiple tenants if they can register or authenticate with manipulated email domains. Although the vulnerability does not affect data integrity or system availability, the confidentiality breach alone is significant given the sensitivity of educational data. The lack of current exploits reduces immediate risk, but the ease of exploitation and the critical nature of the data involved make this a serious concern for European organizations using PlaciPy 1.0.0. Additionally, regulatory scrutiny in Europe may increase the impact due to strict data protection laws.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement robust domain ownership verification mechanisms before assigning tenant identifiers based on email domains. This can include DNS TXT record verification, email-based domain confirmation workflows, or integration with domain registrars. 2. Enforce strict tenant isolation at the application layer, ensuring that access controls do not rely solely on user-provided email domains. 3. Apply the principle of least privilege by restricting user permissions and monitoring access patterns for anomalies indicative of cross-tenant access attempts. 4. Conduct thorough code reviews and security testing focused on multi-tenancy and authorization logic. 5. Until an official patch is released by Praskla-Technology, consider deploying compensating controls such as network segmentation, enhanced logging, and alerting on suspicious tenant access. 6. Educate administrators and users about the risk and encourage reporting of suspicious activity. 7. Regularly audit tenant data access logs to detect unauthorized cross-tenant data access. 8. Engage with the vendor for timely updates and patches, and plan for prompt deployment once available.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2026-25811: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in Praskla-Technology assessment-placipy
Description
CVE-2026-25811 is a medium-severity authorization vulnerability in PlaciPy version 1. 0. 0, a placement management system for educational institutions. The application derives tenant identifiers solely from the user's email domain without validating domain ownership, enabling unauthorized cross-tenant data access. This flaw allows an attacker to access data belonging to other tenants by exploiting the weak domain-based tenant identification. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication but does require low privileges. Although no known exploits are currently in the wild, the impact on confidentiality is significant, especially for institutions managing sensitive student placement data. European educational institutions using PlaciPy 1. 0. 0 are at risk, particularly in countries with high adoption of this software or large educational sectors.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-25811 is an authorization vulnerability classified under CWE-863 affecting PlaciPy version 1.0.0, a placement management system developed by Praskla-Technology for educational institutions. The core issue arises from the application's method of tenant identification: it derives the tenant ID directly from the email domain provided by users during login or registration without verifying if the user legitimately owns or controls that domain. This flawed logic allows an attacker to impersonate or claim a tenant identity simply by using an email address with a domain matching another tenant. Consequently, the attacker can gain unauthorized access to data belonging to other tenants, violating confidentiality boundaries. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network without requiring user interaction and only requires low privileges, making it relatively easy to exploit. The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 reflects a medium severity, primarily due to the limited scope of impact (tenant data leakage) and the absence of integrity or availability compromise. No patches or fixes are currently published, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. The vulnerability highlights a critical design flaw in multi-tenant SaaS applications where tenant isolation depends on unverified user input. Proper domain ownership validation, such as DNS verification or email confirmation workflows, is necessary to prevent unauthorized cross-tenant access.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-25811 is unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data across tenants in the PlaciPy system. For European educational institutions, this could mean exposure of student placement records, personal information, and institutional data to unauthorized parties, potentially violating GDPR and other data protection regulations. The breach of confidentiality can undermine trust in the affected institutions and lead to legal and reputational consequences. Since the vulnerability allows cross-tenant data access without authentication, attackers could systematically harvest data from multiple tenants if they can register or authenticate with manipulated email domains. Although the vulnerability does not affect data integrity or system availability, the confidentiality breach alone is significant given the sensitivity of educational data. The lack of current exploits reduces immediate risk, but the ease of exploitation and the critical nature of the data involved make this a serious concern for European organizations using PlaciPy 1.0.0. Additionally, regulatory scrutiny in Europe may increase the impact due to strict data protection laws.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement robust domain ownership verification mechanisms before assigning tenant identifiers based on email domains. This can include DNS TXT record verification, email-based domain confirmation workflows, or integration with domain registrars. 2. Enforce strict tenant isolation at the application layer, ensuring that access controls do not rely solely on user-provided email domains. 3. Apply the principle of least privilege by restricting user permissions and monitoring access patterns for anomalies indicative of cross-tenant access attempts. 4. Conduct thorough code reviews and security testing focused on multi-tenancy and authorization logic. 5. Until an official patch is released by Praskla-Technology, consider deploying compensating controls such as network segmentation, enhanced logging, and alerting on suspicious tenant access. 6. Educate administrators and users about the risk and encourage reporting of suspicious activity. 7. Regularly audit tenant data access logs to detect unauthorized cross-tenant data access. 8. Engage with the vendor for timely updates and patches, and plan for prompt deployment once available.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2026-02-05T19:58:01.642Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 698a52254b57a58fa1728450
Added to database: 2/9/2026, 9:31:17 PM
Last enriched: 2/17/2026, 9:48:45 AM
Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:18:09 AM
Views: 24
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-27203: CWE-15: External Control of System or Configuration Setting in YosefHayim ebay-mcp
HighCVE-2026-27168: CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in HappySeaFox sail
HighCVE-2026-27134: CWE-287: Improper Authentication in strimzi strimzi-kafka-operator
HighCVE-2026-27190: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in denoland deno
HighCVE-2026-27026: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in py-pdf pypdf
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.