CVE-2026-25991VulnerabilityPublished 13 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-25991: TandoorRecipes recipes · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects TandoorRecipes recipesSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.7 High : upgrade to 2.5.1 soon.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.5.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade TandoorRecipes recipes to 2.5.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TandoorRecipesrecipes	Affected <2.5.1	Fixed in 2.5.1

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately upgrade Tandoor Recipes to version 2.5.1 or later to apply the official patch addressing this SSRF vulnerability. Until the upgrade is possible, restrict access to the Cookmate import feature to trusted users only and monitor usage logs for suspicious activity. Implement network-level controls to limit outbound HTTP requests from the application server, especially to internal IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., block access to 169.254.169.254). Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block SSRF patterns, particularly those involving redirect chains or unusual URL parameters. Enforce the principle of least privilege for user accounts, ensuring that only necessary users have authentication access to the application. Conduct internal network segmentation to reduce the impact of potential SSRF exploitation. Regularly audit and monitor cloud metadata service access logs for anomalous queries. Finally, educate developers and administrators on secure URL validation and redirect handling to prevent similar vulnerabilities in future.

Description

Tandoor Recipes is an application for managing recipes, planning meals, and building shopping lists. Prior to 2.5.1, there is a Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Cookmate recipe import feature of Tandoor Recipes. The application fails to validate the destination URL after following HTTP redirects, allowing any authenticated user (including standard users without administrative privileges) to force the server to connect to arbitrary internal or external resources. The vulnerability lies in cookbook/integration/cookmate.py, within the Cookmate integration class. This vulnerability can be leveraged to scan internal network ports, access cloud instance metadata (e.g., AWS/GCP Metadata Service), or disclose the server's real IP address. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.1.

Impact

For European organizations using Tandoor Recipes versions prior to 2.5.1, this SSRF vulnerability poses significant risks. Attackers with valid user credentials can leverage the flaw to perform internal reconnaissance, potentially identifying vulnerable internal services or misconfigurations. Access to cloud metadata services could lead to credential theft, enabling further lateral movement or data exfiltration. Disclosure of the server's real IP address may facilitate targeted attacks or bypass network protections. Given the application's use in meal planning and recipe management, organizations in hospitality, food services, or related sectors may be affected. The breach of confidentiality could expose sensitive business information or user data. While the vulnerability does not directly affect system integrity or availability, the indirect consequences of credential compromise or network mapping could lead to more severe attacks. The impact is heightened in cloud-hosted environments common in Europe, where metadata services are critical for instance management.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 13 Feb 2026, 19:03 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats