VulnerabilityPublished 7 Mar 2026Updated 9 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-29787: doobidoo mcp-memory-service · Information Exposure

Affects doobidoo mcp-memory-serviceSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 10.21.0 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 10.21.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade mcp-memory-service and doobidoo/mcp-memory-service to 10.21.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
doobidoomcp-memory-service	Affected <10.21.0	Fixed in 10.21.0
GitHubdoobidoo/mcp-memory-service`pkg:github/doobidoo/mcp-memory-service`Other threats	Affected <10.21.0	Fixed in 10.21.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should upgrade mcp-memory-service to version 10.21.0 or later, where the issue is patched. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable anonymous access by ensuring MCP_ALLOW_ANONYMOUS_ACCESS is set to false or unset, enforcing authentication via OAuth or API keys. Additionally, avoid binding the service to 0.0.0.0; instead, restrict the binding to localhost or trusted network interfaces to limit exposure. Implement network-level controls such as firewalls or access control lists to restrict access to the service endpoints only to authorized systems. Regularly audit configurations to verify that sensitive endpoints are not publicly accessible. Monitor network traffic for unusual access patterns to the /api/health/detailed endpoint. Finally, incorporate this vulnerability into vulnerability management and patching processes to ensure timely remediation.

Description

mcp-memory-service is an open-source memory backend for multi-agent systems. Prior to version 10.21.0, the /api/health/detailed endpoint returns detailed system information including OS version, Python version, CPU count, memory totals, disk usage, and the full database filesystem path. When MCP_ALLOW_ANONYMOUS_ACCESS=true is set (required for the HTTP server to function without OAuth/API key), this endpoint is accessible without authentication. Combined with the default 0.0.0.0 binding, this exposes sensitive reconnaissance data to the entire network. This issue has been patched in version 10.21.0.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive system information. Attackers gaining access to OS version, Python version, hardware details, and database paths can use this data for reconnaissance to identify potential attack vectors, exploit version-specific vulnerabilities, or map the network environment. While the vulnerability does not directly enable system compromise, it lowers the attacker's effort and increases the likelihood of successful targeted attacks. Organizations with mcp-memory-service deployed in production environments, especially those exposing the service to public or untrusted networks with anonymous access enabled, face increased risk of information leakage. This can lead to subsequent attacks such as privilege escalation, lateral movement, or data exfiltration. The impact is more significant in environments where the service runs on critical infrastructure or handles sensitive data. Since no integrity or availability impact exists, the immediate operational disruption is low, but the confidentiality breach can have medium-term security consequences.

CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #20OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Subverting Environment Variable Values (opens in a new tab)
ICMP Echo Request Ping (opens in a new tab)
TCP SYN Scan (opens in a new tab)
Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) Records (opens in a new tab)
DNS Zone Transfers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 14 Mar 2026, 19:57 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-200

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats