VulnerabilityPublished 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-3057: a54552239 pearProjectApi · SQL Injection

Affects a54552239 pearProjectApiSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 47% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
a54552239pearProjectApi	Affected 2.8.0 – 2.8.10 11 affected builds	Fixed in–
GitHuba54552239/pearProjectApi`pkg:github/a54552239/pearProjectApi`Other threats	Affected 2.8.0 – 2.8.10 11 affected builds	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:a54552239:pearprojectapi:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should include implementing input validation and sanitization on the projectCode parameter at the application level to prevent SQL injection.
Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block malicious SQL injection payloads targeting the vulnerable endpoint.
Restrict database user privileges used by pearProjectApi to the minimum necessary, limiting the impact of any successful injection.
Monitor application logs and network traffic for unusual queries or access patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.
If possible, isolate the affected backend interface from public networks or restrict access via VPN or IP whitelisting.
Engage in code review and refactor the vulnerable function to use parameterized queries or prepared statements to eliminate injection risk.
8. Conduct penetration testing and vulnerability scanning to confirm mitigation effectiveness. 9. Maintain regular backups of critical data to enable recovery in case of compromise. 10. Stay informed on vendor updates or security advisories regarding this vulnerability.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in a54552239 pearProjectApi up to 2.8.10. Affected is the function dateTotalForProject of the file application/common/Model/Task.php of the component Backend Interface. The manipulation of the argument projectCode results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability in pearProjectApi can have significant impacts on organizations worldwide using this software. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive project data, modification or deletion of records, and potential disruption of backend services. This compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical business information. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges, pivot within internal networks, or conduct further attacks such as ransomware deployment. The lack of vendor response and absence of official patches increase the risk of exploitation. Organizations may face data breaches, regulatory compliance violations, operational downtime, and reputational damage. The medium severity score indicates a moderate but tangible risk that requires timely remediation to prevent exploitation, especially given the availability of a public exploit.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…