CVE-2026-33399VulnerabilityPublished 24 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-33399: ellite Wallos · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects ellite WallosSource CVE Database V5

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.7 High : upgrade to 4.7.0 soon.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 4.7.0

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Wallos and ellite/Wallos to 4.7.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
elliteWallos	Affected <4.7.0	Fixed in 4.7.0
GitHubellite/Wallos`pkg:github/ellite/Wallos`Other threats	Affected <4.7.0	Fixed in 4.7.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should immediately upgrade Wallos to version 4.7.0 or later, where the SSRF fix is fully implemented. Until upgrading is possible, administrators should audit and restrict notification URLs configured by users, ensuring no internal or private IP addresses are allowed. Implement network-level controls such as firewall rules or egress filtering to prevent the Wallos server from making HTTP requests to internal IP ranges. Additionally, enforce strict authentication and authorization policies to limit access to Wallos to trusted users only. Monitoring and logging of outgoing requests from the Wallos server can help detect suspicious SSRF exploitation attempts. Finally, consider isolating the Wallos server in a segmented network zone with limited access to critical internal resources to reduce potential impact.

Description

Wallos is an open-source, self-hostable personal subscription tracker. Prior to version 4.7.0, the SSRF fix applied in version 4.6.2 for CVE-2026-30839 and CVE-2026-30840 is incomplete. The validate_webhook_url_for_ssrf() protection was added to the test* notification endpoints but not to the corresponding save* endpoints. An authenticated user can save an internal/private IP address as a notification URL, and when the cron job sendnotifications.php executes, the request is sent to the internal IP without any SSRF validation. This issue has been patched in version 4.7.0.

Impact

The primary impact of this SSRF vulnerability is unauthorized access to internal network resources that are normally inaccessible from outside the organization. An attacker with valid credentials can exploit this flaw to send crafted requests to internal IP addresses, potentially accessing sensitive internal services, metadata endpoints, or administrative interfaces. This can lead to information disclosure, reconnaissance, and potentially further exploitation within the internal network. Since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability directly, the main concern is confidentiality breach and lateral movement. Organizations using Wallos versions prior to 4.7.0 are at risk, especially those with sensitive internal services exposed only internally. The scope change in CVSS indicates that the vulnerability can affect components beyond the initially vulnerable software, increasing the overall risk. The requirement for authentication limits exploitation to insiders or compromised accounts, but the lack of user interaction requirement facilitates automated attacks once credentials are obtained.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Mar 2026, 19:15 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats