VulnerabilityPublished 11 Mar 2026Updated 14 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-3928: Google Chrome · Insufficient Policy Enforcement

Affects Google ChromeSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.3 Medium : upgrade to 146.0.7680.71 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 146.0.7680.71

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Chrome and google/chrome to 146.0.7680.71.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GoogleChrome	Affected >=146.0.7680.71 <146.0.7680.71	Fixed in 146.0.7680.71
Googlegoogle/chrome`pkg:deb/google/chrome`Other threats	Affected <146.0.7680.71	Fixed in 146.0.7680.71

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-3928, organizations should: 1) Ensure all Chrome installations are updated to version 146.0.7680.71 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. 2) Implement strict extension management policies using Chrome Enterprise policies to restrict installation of extensions to those from trusted sources or approved lists. 3) Educate users about the risks of installing untrusted or unknown extensions and train them to recognize suspicious UI behavior. 4) Employ endpoint security solutions that monitor and block unauthorized extension installations or modifications. 5) Regularly audit installed extensions across organizational devices to detect and remove any unauthorized or suspicious extensions. 6) Consider deploying browser isolation or sandboxing technologies to limit the impact of malicious extensions. These targeted measures go beyond generic patching and user awareness by enforcing policy controls and proactive monitoring.

Description

Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.71 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to perform UI spoofing via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-3928 is on the integrity of the user interface within Google Chrome, enabling attackers to perform UI spoofing via malicious extensions. This can lead to users being deceived into entering sensitive information, clicking malicious links, or performing unintended actions, increasing the risk of phishing and social engineering attacks. While confidentiality and availability are not directly affected, the indirect consequences can include credential theft, unauthorized transactions, or malware installation. Organizations relying heavily on Chrome for web access are at risk of targeted attacks exploiting this vulnerability, especially if users are not trained to recognize suspicious extensions or UI anomalies. The requirement for user interaction (extension installation) limits the scope but does not eliminate risk, as social engineering remains a common attack vector. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not preclude future exploitation. Overall, the vulnerability can undermine user trust and security posture if not addressed promptly.

CWE-451User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The user interface (UI) does not properly represent critical information to the user, allowing the information - or its source - to be obscured or spoofed. This is often a component in phishing attacks.
Implementation · Input Validation
Perform data validation (e.g. syntax, length, etc.) before interpreting the data.
Architecture and Design · Output Encoding
Create a strategy for presenting information, and plan for how to display unusual characters.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Spear Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Mobile Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Resource Location Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
Action Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 20 Mar 2026, 02:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-451

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats