Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2026-4342: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Kubernetes ingress-nginx

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-4342cvecve-2026-4342cwe-20
Published: Thu Mar 19 2026 (03/19/2026, 21:50:17 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: Kubernetes
Product: ingress-nginx

Description

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a combination of Ingress annotations can be used to inject configuration into nginx. This can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller, and disclosure of Secrets accessible to the controller. (Note that in the default installation, the controller can access all Secrets cluster-wide.)

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 03/19/2026, 22:09:07 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2026-4342 is a vulnerability identified in the Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller, specifically related to CWE-20: Improper Input Validation. The ingress-nginx controller processes Ingress resource annotations to configure nginx behavior dynamically. This vulnerability arises when a crafted combination of Ingress annotations bypasses input validation, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary configuration directives into the nginx configuration. Such injection can lead to arbitrary code execution within the ingress-nginx controller's runtime environment. Since the ingress-nginx controller typically runs with permissions to access all Kubernetes Secrets cluster-wide, exploitation can also lead to the disclosure of sensitive Secrets data. The CVSS v3.1 score of 8.8 reflects a high-severity issue with network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requiring privileges (PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N), and impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). The vulnerability affects all versions of ingress-nginx prior to the patch release. Although no exploits have been reported in the wild yet, the potential for severe impact on Kubernetes clusters is significant. The root cause is insufficient validation of annotation inputs, allowing malicious payloads to be injected into nginx configuration files, which are then executed by the controller. This flaw highlights the risks of dynamic configuration based on user-supplied metadata in container orchestration environments.

Potential Impact

The impact of CVE-2026-4342 is substantial for organizations running Kubernetes clusters with ingress-nginx controllers. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution within the ingress-nginx controller pod, potentially allowing attackers to escalate privileges or move laterally within the cluster. The ability to disclose all Secrets accessible to the controller is particularly critical, as Secrets often contain credentials, tokens, and sensitive configuration data. This can lead to further compromise of cluster components, data exfiltration, and disruption of services. Since ingress-nginx is widely used for managing external access to Kubernetes services, this vulnerability threatens the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of applications and data hosted on affected clusters. Organizations relying on ingress-nginx for production workloads face risks of service outages, data breaches, and compliance violations if this vulnerability is exploited.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2026-4342, organizations should immediately update ingress-nginx controllers to the latest patched version once available. Until patches are applied, restrict who can create or modify Ingress resources and annotations by enforcing strict Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) policies, limiting annotation permissions to trusted users only. Implement admission controllers or validating webhooks to sanitize and validate Ingress annotations before they are accepted by the API server. Monitor ingress-nginx controller logs and Kubernetes audit logs for suspicious annotation changes or configuration injections. Consider isolating ingress-nginx controllers with minimal privileges and using Pod Security Policies or equivalent to limit container capabilities. Regularly audit Secrets access and rotate sensitive credentials to reduce exposure. Employ network segmentation to limit the blast radius if the ingress-nginx controller is compromised. Finally, maintain an incident response plan tailored to Kubernetes environments to quickly detect and respond to exploitation attempts.

Pro Console: star threats, build custom feeds, automate alerts via Slack, email & webhooks.Upgrade to Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
kubernetes
Date Reserved
2026-03-17T15:35:59.315Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69bc708fe32a4fbe5ffd51a3

Added to database: 3/19/2026, 9:54:23 PM

Last enriched: 3/19/2026, 10:09:07 PM

Last updated: 3/20/2026, 12:08:51 AM

Views: 9

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats

Breach by OffSeqOFFSEQFRIENDS — 25% OFF

Check if your credentials are on the dark web

Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.

Scan now
OffSeq TrainingCredly Certified

Lead Pen Test Professional

Technical5-day eLearningPECB Accredited
View courses