VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2026Updated 24 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-4469: itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 31 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecodeOnline Frozen Foods Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:itsourcecode:online_frozen_foods_ordering_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-4469, organizations should immediately audit and sanitize all inputs in the /admin/admin_edit_menu_action.php script, particularly the product_name parameter. Implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements is critical to prevent SQL injection. If source code modification is not feasible, deploying a web application firewall (WAF) with SQL injection detection rules can provide a temporary defense. Restricting access to the admin interface by IP whitelisting or VPN can reduce exposure. Regularly monitoring logs for suspicious database query patterns or failed injection attempts is advised. Organizations should also engage with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates and apply them promptly once available. Conducting security code reviews and penetration testing on the ordering system will help identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities. Finally, educating developers on secure coding practices is essential to prevent recurrence.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/admin_edit_menu_action.php. Such manipulation of the argument product_name leads to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-4469 is unauthorized access and manipulation of the backend database of the Online Frozen Foods Ordering System. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability could extract sensitive data such as product details, pricing, or customer information, potentially leading to data breaches and privacy violations. They might also alter menu data, disrupting business operations and causing reputational damage. While the vulnerability does not allow full system compromise or remote code execution, the integrity and availability of the ordering system could be compromised, affecting customer trust and sales. Organizations relying on this software may face operational disruptions and compliance risks if sensitive data is exposed. The medium severity rating reflects these moderate but tangible risks. The absence of known active exploitation reduces immediate threat but does not eliminate future risks, especially given the public availability of exploit code.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…