VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-4470: itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 31 Oct 2026, 08:20 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecodeOnline Frozen Foods Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:itsourcecode:online_frozen_foods_ordering_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

Given the absence of an official patch, organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. First, restrict access to the /admin/admin_edit_menu.php interface to trusted IP addresses or VPN users only, minimizing exposure. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the product_name parameter. Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data, especially in administrative modules, to prevent injection attacks. If possible, upgrade or migrate to a newer, patched version of the software once available. Regularly audit database logs for suspicious queries indicative of injection attempts. Additionally, enforce the principle of least privilege for administrative accounts and monitor their activity closely. Finally, educate administrators about the risks and signs of SQL injection exploitation to enhance detection and response capabilities.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin/admin_edit_menu.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument product_name results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is unauthorized access to sensitive data stored within the Online Frozen Foods Ordering System's backend database. Attackers with administrative access can exploit the SQL injection to extract confidential information such as product details, pricing, or potentially customer data if stored in the same database. Data integrity may also be compromised, allowing attackers to alter menu items or pricing, which could disrupt business operations or lead to financial losses. Although availability impact is low, successful exploitation could undermine trust in the ordering system and cause reputational damage. Organizations relying on this system, especially those handling sensitive customer or business data, face risks of data breaches and regulatory non-compliance. The fact that the exploit is publicly available increases the urgency for mitigation, as opportunistic attackers may attempt to leverage this vulnerability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…