VulnerabilityPublished 20 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-4471: itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System · SQL Injection

Affects itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering SystemSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 31 Oct 2026, 20:20 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 31 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
itsourcecodeOnline Frozen Foods Ordering System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:itsourcecode:online_frozen_foods_ordering_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-4471, organizations should first verify if updates or patches are available from the vendor and apply them promptly. In the absence of official patches, implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'First_Name' parameter and all other user inputs, employing parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. Restrict administrative access to trusted personnel and enforce strong authentication mechanisms to reduce the risk of privilege abuse. Conduct regular security audits and code reviews focusing on SQL injection vulnerabilities. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting the affected endpoint. Monitor logs for unusual database query patterns or failed injection attempts. Additionally, consider isolating the administrative interface from public networks or limiting access via VPN or IP whitelisting to reduce exposure. Educate administrators about the risks of SQL injection and the importance of credential security.

Description

CVE-2026-4471 is a medium severity SQL injection vulnerability found in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System version 1.0. The flaw exists in the /admin/admin_edit_employee.php file, specifically in the handling of the First_Name parameter. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to manipulate SQL queries without requiring user interaction or privileges, potentially leading to unauthorized data access or modification. Although the exploit code is publicly available, no known active exploitation has been reported. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability to a limited extent due to required privileges and limited scope. Organizations using this system should prioritize patching or applying mitigations to prevent exploitation. Countries with significant use of this product or similar e-commerce platforms are at higher risk. The CVSS 4.

Impact

The potential impact of CVE-2026-4471 includes unauthorized access to sensitive employee data, modification or deletion of database records, and potential disruption of the ordering system's administrative functions. Since the vulnerability requires high privileges, the risk is somewhat mitigated by the need for an attacker to already have elevated access, but insider threats or compromised admin accounts could exploit this flaw. Exploitation could lead to data breaches affecting employee personal information, undermining organizational confidentiality and integrity. Additionally, attackers could manipulate data to disrupt business operations or cover tracks for further attacks. The availability impact is limited but possible if database integrity is compromised. Organizations relying on this ordering system could face reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and operational downtime if exploited. The public availability of exploit code increases the urgency for mitigation despite the medium severity rating.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…