Input on using the ROT and network connection to hack voting and tabulating software and hardware.

Medium
Published: Sun Jun 15 2025 (06/15/2025, 04:44:57 UTC)
Source: Reddit NetSec

Description

I came across this article and in speaking with my friends in the netsec field I received lots of good input. Figured I’d push it here and see what the community thinks. there are links in the article and I checked them to see if they coincided with the articles points. i’,m not affiliated with this article but with the lawsuit in New York moving forward and the Dominion lawsuit in 2020 giving the hardware and software to the GOP. I had questions the community might be able to clarify ‘

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/15/2025, 05:49:34 UTC

Technical Analysis

The reported security threat centers around potential vulnerabilities in voting and tabulating software and hardware, specifically referencing concerns about the use of ROT (likely referring to 'Ring Oscillator Technology' or a similar concept) and network connections as attack vectors. The discussion originates from a Reddit NetSec community post that references an external article hosted on a substack domain, which raises questions about the integrity and security of election systems, particularly in light of ongoing legal actions such as the Dominion lawsuit and a related lawsuit in New York. Although the post itself is not affiliated with the original article, it seeks community input on the feasibility and technical details of exploiting these systems via network connections or hardware-level manipulations. The threat implies that attackers could leverage network access or hardware vulnerabilities to manipulate vote counts or interfere with tabulation processes. However, the technical details are sparse, with no specific affected versions, CVEs, or known exploits reported. The discussion level is minimal, and the Reddit post has low engagement, indicating limited current evidence of active exploitation or widespread vulnerability confirmation. The mention of hardware and software being provided to political parties (e.g., GOP) suggests concerns about supply chain or insider threats, but no concrete technical evidence is presented. Overall, this threat highlights the ongoing concerns about election security, particularly the risks posed by network connectivity and hardware vulnerabilities in voting infrastructure, but lacks detailed technical validation or confirmed exploitability at this time.

Potential Impact

If such vulnerabilities were exploited, the impact on European organizations involved in election management or democratic processes could be significant. Manipulation of voting or tabulation systems could undermine the integrity and trustworthiness of elections, leading to political instability and loss of public confidence. For European countries that use electronic voting or tabulation systems with network connectivity or hardware components similar to those discussed, the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of election data could be at risk. This could result in unauthorized alteration of vote counts, denial of service during critical election periods, or leakage of sensitive voter information. Beyond direct election authorities, related government agencies and political parties could face reputational damage and operational disruption. However, given the lack of confirmed exploits or detailed technical vulnerabilities, the immediate risk appears limited but warrants proactive attention given the high stakes involved in election security.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Conduct thorough security audits and penetration testing of all voting and tabulation hardware and software, focusing on network interfaces and hardware-level components such as ROT or similar technologies. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and air-gapping where feasible to minimize exposure of voting systems to external networks. 3. Employ hardware attestation and integrity verification mechanisms to detect unauthorized modifications or tampering. 4. Enforce multi-factor authentication and role-based access controls for all election system components to reduce insider threat risks. 5. Establish rigorous supply chain security protocols, including vendor vetting and hardware/software provenance verification. 6. Monitor network traffic for anomalous patterns indicative of exploitation attempts targeting voting infrastructure. 7. Develop and rehearse incident response plans specific to election system compromises, including rapid forensic analysis and recovery procedures. 8. Engage with cybersecurity communities and election security experts to stay updated on emerging threats and best practices. 9. Avoid reliance on single vendors or proprietary systems without transparent security assessments. 10. Promote transparency and public communication strategies to maintain trust in election integrity.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Source Type
reddit
Subreddit
netsec
Reddit Score
0
Discussion Level
minimal
Content Source
reddit_link_post
Domain
thiswillhold.substack.com
Newsworthiness Assessment
{"score":25,"reasons":["external_link","non_newsworthy_keywords:question,community","established_author","recent_news"],"isNewsworthy":true,"foundNewsworthy":[],"foundNonNewsworthy":["question","community"]}
Has External Source
true
Trusted Domain
false

Threat ID: 684e5ee8a8c92127438280e4

Added to database: 6/15/2025, 5:49:28 AM

Last enriched: 6/15/2025, 5:49:34 AM

Last updated: 6/15/2025, 9:03:10 AM

Views: 3

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats