Making .NET Serialization Gadgets by Hand
This report discusses the manual creation of . NET serialization gadgets, which are components that can be exploited in deserialization attacks to execute arbitrary code. While no specific vulnerabilities or exploits are currently known in the wild, the technique highlights potential risks in . NET applications that use insecure deserialization. The threat is of medium severity due to the complexity of exploitation and the need for specific conditions. European organizations using . NET frameworks in their applications should be aware of this emerging technique and review their deserialization practices. Mitigations include avoiding deserialization of untrusted data, implementing strict input validation, and employing secure coding practices. Countries with significant . NET development ecosystems and critical infrastructure relying on .
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The discussed threat centers on the manual crafting of .NET serialization gadgets, which are specialized object graphs that, when deserialized, can trigger unintended code execution. Serialization gadgets are a known vector in deserialization attacks, where attackers exploit the deserialization process to execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, or disrupt application behavior. The blog post linked from vulncheck.com and shared on Reddit's NetSec community outlines methods for creating these gadgets by hand, indicating that attackers or security researchers can develop custom payloads without relying solely on publicly known gadget chains. This increases the attack surface for .NET applications that deserialize data from untrusted sources without adequate validation or protection. Although no specific vulnerable versions or exploits are reported, the technique's existence suggests that .NET applications using binary or other serialization formats may be at risk if they do not implement secure deserialization practices. The threat requires a medium level of expertise to exploit and typically demands that the attacker can supply serialized data to the target application. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk but signals a potential future attack vector. The discussion is minimal but noteworthy due to its implications for .NET security and the evolving landscape of deserialization attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat could be significant if they operate critical applications built on .NET frameworks that accept serialized input. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution, data breaches, and service disruptions, affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and industrial control systems that rely heavily on .NET technologies may face increased risk. The medium severity reflects the technical skill required and the need for specific conditions, such as the ability to influence serialized input. However, the potential for privilege escalation and lateral movement within networks elevates the threat's seriousness. Organizations failing to address insecure deserialization could experience operational downtime, regulatory penalties under GDPR for data breaches, and reputational damage. The evolving nature of .NET serialization gadget development suggests that attackers may increasingly target these vectors, necessitating proactive defenses.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Avoid deserializing data from untrusted or unauthenticated sources; 2) Employ allowlists for types permitted during deserialization to prevent unexpected object creation; 3) Use safer serialization formats such as JSON or XML with strict schema validation instead of binary serialization; 4) Apply input validation and integrity checks (e.g., digital signatures) on serialized data before processing; 5) Keep .NET frameworks and libraries up to date with security patches; 6) Conduct regular code reviews and security testing focused on deserialization logic; 7) Utilize application-layer firewalls and runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and block suspicious deserialization activities; 8) Educate developers about secure deserialization practices and the risks of gadget chains; 9) Monitor logs for anomalies related to deserialization processes; 10) Consider adopting Microsoft's recommended secure deserialization patterns and tools such as System.Text.Json with custom converters that avoid unsafe deserialization.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, Poland
Making .NET Serialization Gadgets by Hand
Description
This report discusses the manual creation of . NET serialization gadgets, which are components that can be exploited in deserialization attacks to execute arbitrary code. While no specific vulnerabilities or exploits are currently known in the wild, the technique highlights potential risks in . NET applications that use insecure deserialization. The threat is of medium severity due to the complexity of exploitation and the need for specific conditions. European organizations using . NET frameworks in their applications should be aware of this emerging technique and review their deserialization practices. Mitigations include avoiding deserialization of untrusted data, implementing strict input validation, and employing secure coding practices. Countries with significant . NET development ecosystems and critical infrastructure relying on .
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The discussed threat centers on the manual crafting of .NET serialization gadgets, which are specialized object graphs that, when deserialized, can trigger unintended code execution. Serialization gadgets are a known vector in deserialization attacks, where attackers exploit the deserialization process to execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, or disrupt application behavior. The blog post linked from vulncheck.com and shared on Reddit's NetSec community outlines methods for creating these gadgets by hand, indicating that attackers or security researchers can develop custom payloads without relying solely on publicly known gadget chains. This increases the attack surface for .NET applications that deserialize data from untrusted sources without adequate validation or protection. Although no specific vulnerable versions or exploits are reported, the technique's existence suggests that .NET applications using binary or other serialization formats may be at risk if they do not implement secure deserialization practices. The threat requires a medium level of expertise to exploit and typically demands that the attacker can supply serialized data to the target application. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk but signals a potential future attack vector. The discussion is minimal but noteworthy due to its implications for .NET security and the evolving landscape of deserialization attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat could be significant if they operate critical applications built on .NET frameworks that accept serialized input. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution, data breaches, and service disruptions, affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and industrial control systems that rely heavily on .NET technologies may face increased risk. The medium severity reflects the technical skill required and the need for specific conditions, such as the ability to influence serialized input. However, the potential for privilege escalation and lateral movement within networks elevates the threat's seriousness. Organizations failing to address insecure deserialization could experience operational downtime, regulatory penalties under GDPR for data breaches, and reputational damage. The evolving nature of .NET serialization gadget development suggests that attackers may increasingly target these vectors, necessitating proactive defenses.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Avoid deserializing data from untrusted or unauthenticated sources; 2) Employ allowlists for types permitted during deserialization to prevent unexpected object creation; 3) Use safer serialization formats such as JSON or XML with strict schema validation instead of binary serialization; 4) Apply input validation and integrity checks (e.g., digital signatures) on serialized data before processing; 5) Keep .NET frameworks and libraries up to date with security patches; 6) Conduct regular code reviews and security testing focused on deserialization logic; 7) Utilize application-layer firewalls and runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and block suspicious deserialization activities; 8) Educate developers about secure deserialization practices and the risks of gadget chains; 9) Monitor logs for anomalies related to deserialization processes; 10) Consider adopting Microsoft's recommended secure deserialization patterns and tools such as System.Text.Json with custom converters that avoid unsafe deserialization.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Source Type
- Subreddit
- netsec
- Reddit Score
- 1
- Discussion Level
- minimal
- Content Source
- reddit_link_post
- Domain
- vulncheck.com
- Newsworthiness Assessment
- {"score":27.1,"reasons":["external_link","established_author","very_recent"],"isNewsworthy":true,"foundNewsworthy":[],"foundNonNewsworthy":[]}
- Has External Source
- true
- Trusted Domain
- false
Threat ID: 69150587e6b3e50d5099d1f1
Added to database: 11/12/2025, 10:09:11 PM
Last enriched: 11/12/2025, 10:09:25 PM
Last updated: 11/12/2025, 11:15:14 PM
Views: 6
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Mindgard Finds Sora 2 Vulnerability Leaking Hidden System Prompt via Audio
MediumDarkComet RAT Resurfaces Disguised as Bitcoin Wallet
MediumGoogle Sues China-Based Hackers Behind $1 Billion Lighthouse Phishing Platform
HighAustralia’s spy chief warns of China-linked threats to critical infrastructure
CriticalAmazon Uncovers Attacks Exploited Cisco ISE and Citrix NetScaler as Zero-Day Flaws
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.