Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished

CVE-2026-111730: P-Net before 1.0.3 does not validate the LengthPeerStationName field of a CheckPeers block in

Source GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-111730· High 7.2

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.2 High : upgrade to 1.0.3 soon.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 19:00 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
7.2High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
CVSS scores by source
CNA (rt-labs)CVSS 4.07.2
Patch
Available – fixed in 1.0.3
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 29 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade P-Net to 1.0.3.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
RT-LabsP-NetAffected
  • <1.0.3
Fixed in
  • 1.0.3

Description

P-Net before 1.0.3 does not validate the LengthPeerStationName field of a CheckPeers block in get_check_peer(). The received length (up to 255) was used to copy data into the 241-byte peer station name buffer and to place the terminating NUL byte, so a crafted block writes up to 15 bytes past the end of the buffer. This can lead to a crash (denial of service) or potentially arbitrary code execution. Requires establishment of session that needs ADJACENT network access.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…