Skip to main content
CVE-2025-2148VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-2148: PyTorch Tuple torch.ops.profiler._call_end_callbacks_on_jit_fut memory corruption

Affects pytorchSource GCVE Database

0

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 2.7.0 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

Severity
High

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 37% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 2.7.0

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 26 Feb 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

What to do

Upgrade pytorch to 2.7.0.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Bitnamipytorchpkg:bitnami/pytorchOther threatsAffected
  • >=2.6.0 <2.7.0
Fixed in
  • 2.7.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available for this vulnerability. Users should upgrade PyTorch to version 2.7.0 or later to remediate the issue. No additional mitigation steps are indicated by the vendor advisory.

Description

A vulnerability was found in PyTorch 2.6.0+cu124. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function torch.ops.profiler._call_end_callbacks_on_jit_fut of the component Tuple Handler. The manipulation of the argument None leads to memory corruption. The attack can be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…