Reflecting on AI in 2025: Faster Attacks, Same Old Tradecraft
In 2025, AI did not revolutionize cyber attacks as predicted. Instead, adversaries used AI to accelerate traditional tradecraft, focusing on speed and accessibility rather than new offensive capabilities. The article examines several case studies showcasing AI-generated scripts for credential theft and browser exploitation. These attacks, while faster and more accessible to less-skilled operators, still rely on familiar techniques detectable by basic security measures. The outlook for 2026 suggests continued AI-driven commoditization of tradecraft, with more templated attacks and improved phishing attempts. However, fundamental security practices remain effective against these evolving threats.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
This threat intelligence report analyzes the impact of AI on cyber attack methodologies observed in 2025. Contrary to initial predictions that AI would revolutionize cyber offense, adversaries instead used AI to automate and speed up traditional attack techniques. Case studies highlight AI-generated PowerShell scripts and browser exploitation tools designed for credential theft. These scripts automate common tactics such as credential dumping (MITRE ATT&CK T1003.001), lateral movement (T1021.001, T1021.006), execution through signed binaries (T1218), and command and control communications (T1041, T1102.002). The use of AI lowers the skill barrier, enabling less-experienced attackers to deploy effective campaigns rapidly. However, the underlying tradecraft remains conventional and detectable by existing endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and network monitoring. The campaign includes malicious Chrome extensions and PowerShell scripts, with multiple file hashes identified as indicators of compromise. No zero-day exploits or novel vulnerabilities have been reported, and no known threat actors or targeted sectors are identified. The outlook for 2026 anticipates further commoditization of attack tools, increased phishing sophistication, and widespread use of AI-generated templates, but no fundamental change in attack complexity. This suggests that organizations maintaining robust security hygiene and layered defenses will continue to mitigate these threats effectively.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact is an increase in the volume and speed of credential theft and exploitation attempts, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data breaches if basic security controls are lacking. The commoditization of attack tools means that less-skilled attackers can launch campaigns at scale, increasing the likelihood of successful phishing and exploitation attempts. This could strain incident response teams and increase operational risk. However, since the attacks rely on known techniques, organizations with mature security programs, including MFA, endpoint protection, and user awareness training, are well-positioned to defend against these threats. Critical infrastructure and sectors with high-value credentials (finance, healthcare, government) may face elevated risk due to the attractiveness of their data. The lack of novel exploits reduces the risk of widespread zero-day incidents, but the increased attack speed demands timely patching and monitoring. Overall, the threat elevates the importance of maintaining fundamental cybersecurity practices rather than requiring new defensive technologies.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigations: 1) Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all critical systems to reduce credential theft impact. 2) Deploy and tune endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect common PowerShell and script-based attack patterns, including monitoring for suspicious command-line activity and script execution. 3) Harden browser environments by restricting or monitoring extension installations, especially for Chrome, to prevent malicious extension deployment. 4) Conduct regular phishing awareness training tailored to evolving AI-enhanced phishing tactics to reduce user susceptibility. 5) Implement network segmentation and least privilege access controls to limit lateral movement opportunities. 6) Maintain timely patch management to close known vulnerabilities that attackers might exploit alongside credential theft. 7) Utilize threat intelligence feeds to monitor for the provided file hashes and indicators of compromise to enable rapid detection and response. 8) Establish incident response playbooks that include AI-accelerated attack scenarios to improve readiness. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific tradecraft acceleration and AI-generated attack vectors described.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
Indicators of Compromise
- hash: 19d19ac8199298f7b623693f4e38cb79aba8294c258746a3c9d9a183b2bb2578
- hash: 4574ffef886ca461a89db7b9aaaede2e20ac802a82db94e3b6e4d0e86370e7a4
- hash: 57f2a2bb77f5400b46ebc42118f46ffaa497d5c03c24d1cb3868dde2381a0f07
- hash: cf289b3ab970a3d04213b7312220f769f493f2f2c666ed7a8fe512075a84e995
- hash: d272c90fc264fa3e4a71fbeff324273c99dd0a48fd2f0234aa6fdd3e80add936
- hash: f75219e2aea50b8fa618f55389ab9a58351fb6acd4ea7c7de3e656183d5a52f0
Reflecting on AI in 2025: Faster Attacks, Same Old Tradecraft
Description
In 2025, AI did not revolutionize cyber attacks as predicted. Instead, adversaries used AI to accelerate traditional tradecraft, focusing on speed and accessibility rather than new offensive capabilities. The article examines several case studies showcasing AI-generated scripts for credential theft and browser exploitation. These attacks, while faster and more accessible to less-skilled operators, still rely on familiar techniques detectable by basic security measures. The outlook for 2026 suggests continued AI-driven commoditization of tradecraft, with more templated attacks and improved phishing attempts. However, fundamental security practices remain effective against these evolving threats.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
This threat intelligence report analyzes the impact of AI on cyber attack methodologies observed in 2025. Contrary to initial predictions that AI would revolutionize cyber offense, adversaries instead used AI to automate and speed up traditional attack techniques. Case studies highlight AI-generated PowerShell scripts and browser exploitation tools designed for credential theft. These scripts automate common tactics such as credential dumping (MITRE ATT&CK T1003.001), lateral movement (T1021.001, T1021.006), execution through signed binaries (T1218), and command and control communications (T1041, T1102.002). The use of AI lowers the skill barrier, enabling less-experienced attackers to deploy effective campaigns rapidly. However, the underlying tradecraft remains conventional and detectable by existing endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and network monitoring. The campaign includes malicious Chrome extensions and PowerShell scripts, with multiple file hashes identified as indicators of compromise. No zero-day exploits or novel vulnerabilities have been reported, and no known threat actors or targeted sectors are identified. The outlook for 2026 anticipates further commoditization of attack tools, increased phishing sophistication, and widespread use of AI-generated templates, but no fundamental change in attack complexity. This suggests that organizations maintaining robust security hygiene and layered defenses will continue to mitigate these threats effectively.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact is an increase in the volume and speed of credential theft and exploitation attempts, potentially leading to unauthorized access and data breaches if basic security controls are lacking. The commoditization of attack tools means that less-skilled attackers can launch campaigns at scale, increasing the likelihood of successful phishing and exploitation attempts. This could strain incident response teams and increase operational risk. However, since the attacks rely on known techniques, organizations with mature security programs, including MFA, endpoint protection, and user awareness training, are well-positioned to defend against these threats. Critical infrastructure and sectors with high-value credentials (finance, healthcare, government) may face elevated risk due to the attractiveness of their data. The lack of novel exploits reduces the risk of widespread zero-day incidents, but the increased attack speed demands timely patching and monitoring. Overall, the threat elevates the importance of maintaining fundamental cybersecurity practices rather than requiring new defensive technologies.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigations: 1) Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all critical systems to reduce credential theft impact. 2) Deploy and tune endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect common PowerShell and script-based attack patterns, including monitoring for suspicious command-line activity and script execution. 3) Harden browser environments by restricting or monitoring extension installations, especially for Chrome, to prevent malicious extension deployment. 4) Conduct regular phishing awareness training tailored to evolving AI-enhanced phishing tactics to reduce user susceptibility. 5) Implement network segmentation and least privilege access controls to limit lateral movement opportunities. 6) Maintain timely patch management to close known vulnerabilities that attackers might exploit alongside credential theft. 7) Utilize threat intelligence feeds to monitor for the provided file hashes and indicators of compromise to enable rapid detection and response. 8) Establish incident response playbooks that include AI-accelerated attack scenarios to improve readiness. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific tradecraft acceleration and AI-generated attack vectors described.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Author
- AlienVault
- Tlp
- white
- References
- ["https://www.huntress.com/blog/ai-2025-faster-attacks-same-tradecraft"]
- Adversary
- null
- Pulse Id
- 696559e3a2e33d556f6cba0c
- Threat Score
- null
Indicators of Compromise
Hash
| Value | Description | Copy |
|---|---|---|
hash19d19ac8199298f7b623693f4e38cb79aba8294c258746a3c9d9a183b2bb2578 | — | |
hash4574ffef886ca461a89db7b9aaaede2e20ac802a82db94e3b6e4d0e86370e7a4 | — | |
hash57f2a2bb77f5400b46ebc42118f46ffaa497d5c03c24d1cb3868dde2381a0f07 | — | |
hashcf289b3ab970a3d04213b7312220f769f493f2f2c666ed7a8fe512075a84e995 | — | |
hashd272c90fc264fa3e4a71fbeff324273c99dd0a48fd2f0234aa6fdd3e80add936 | — | |
hashf75219e2aea50b8fa618f55389ab9a58351fb6acd4ea7c7de3e656183d5a52f0 | — |
Threat ID: 69666eb2a60475309f840324
Added to database: 1/13/2026, 4:11:30 PM
Last enriched: 1/13/2026, 4:27:16 PM
Last updated: 1/14/2026, 3:54:54 AM
Views: 9
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
SHADOW#REACTOR – Text-Only Staging, .NET Reactor, and In-Memory Remcos RAT Deployments
MediumAnalyzing a Multi-Stage AsyncRAT Campaign via Managed Detection and Response
MediumThe Cloud-Native Malware Framework
MediumCNCERT: Risk Warning Regarding the "Black Cat" Gang's Use of Search Engines to Spread Counterfeit Notepad++ Download Remote Control Backdoors
MediumThreat Research: PHALT#BLYX: Fake BSODs and Trusted Build Tools
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.