[RFC Draft] Built mathematical solution for PKI's 'impossible' problem. Response time: months→2 hours. IETF interest level: ¯\(ツ)/¯
Source Reddit NetSec
Rated by Threat Radar
Data as of 4 Jul 2025, 15:25 UTC
What to do
AI-suggested
Beyond generic advice such as monitoring and patching, European organizations should: 1) Advocate for and participate in the development and adoption of rapid CA compromise response protocols, including supporting the proposed mathematical solution through industry consortia and standards bodies. 2) Implement Certificate Transparency (CT) logs and actively monitor them to detect suspicious certificate issuance quickly. 3) Employ multi-factor authentication and hardware security modules (HSMs) for CA key management to reduce compromise risk. 4) Use short-lived certificates and automated certificate management to limit the impact of fraudulent certificates. 5) Establish incident response plans that include rapid revocation and trust reconfiguration procedures aligned with emerging standards. 6) Collaborate with browser vendors and PKI stakeholders to ensure swift revocation and trust updates are propagated. 7) Invest in threat intelligence sharing focused on PKI-related threats to stay ahead of emerging attack techniques.
Description
**TL;DR: Built a mathematical solution that cuts CA compromise response time from months to 2 hours. Just submitted to IETF. Watch them discuss it for 10+ years while dozens more DigiNotars happen.** # The Problem That Keeps Me Up At Night Working on a DNS-Security project, I realized something absolutely bonkers: Nuclear power plants have SCRAM buttons. Airplanes have emergency procedures. The global PKI that secures the entire internet? Nope. If a Root CA gets pwned, we basically call every