Search: rx.the
1,622 threats
Most recently published first
| Severity | CVSS | Signals | Threat | Source | Published | Score and star |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 2.3 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-108115kortix-ai suna · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Low2.3EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-108115 Kortix Suna versions from 0.10.7 up to but not including 0.13.52 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This flaw allows project managers with write permissions on project connectors to bypass IP address restrictions by using IPv6 6to4 or Teredo addresses that embed private IPv4 addresses. Exploiting this, attackers can set connector URLs to access internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, potentially reading sensitive responses. The vulnerability has a low CVSS 4.0 score of 2.3, indicating limited impact and exploitability. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Critical | 9.8 | EPSS 0.3% | Critical9.8EPSS 0.3%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-62046 A critical deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability (CVE-2026-62046) exists in ThemeREX Group Gutentype up to version 2.1.12. This flaw allows object injection, potentially leading to full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 9.8, indicating high severity. No patch or remediation details are currently provided. | GCVE Database | ||
| Medium | 5.3 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-3717WP CV Builder · Missing Authorization Medium5.3EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-3717 The WP CV Builder plugin for WordPress has a vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary PNG files due to missing authorization checks in the 'wp_save_signature_image' function. This affects all versions up to and including 1.3.1. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized file uploads to the WordPress uploads directory. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 6.4 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-97643GiveWP (WordPress plugin) · Cross-site Scripting Medium6.4EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-97643 A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the GiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform for WordPress, affecting versions up to and including 4.17.0. The flaw arises from insufficient sanitization and escaping of user-supplied shortcode attributes, allowing authenticated users with Contributor-level access or higher to inject malicious scripts. These scripts execute whenever a user views the affected page, potentially compromising user interactions. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 7.5 | High7.5GCVE Database ## Summary A user who has only read permission on a project can call the single link-share read endpoint and receive the share's `hash` field — the secret credential that the anonymous `POST /shares/{share}/auth` endpoint exchanges for a link-share JWT carrying the share's permission (read / read-write / admin). A read-only member can therefore mint a write- or admin-level token for the project and perform writes they are not entitled to, while their own user token is correctly refused. This is the remaining variant of the link-share hash disclosure class: GHSA-8hp8-9fhr-pfm9 fixed the list endpoint (ReadAll now requires project admin) but the single-read endpoint's gate was never aligned. Verified on Vikunja 2.5.0; the weak gate has existed since the endpoint, so earlier versions are likely affected too. ## Details Affected endpoints (both verified with a complete chain): - v1: `GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/shares/{share}` - v2: `GET /api/v2/projects/{project}/shares/{share}` Permission gate: `LinkSharing.CanRead` (`pkg/models/link_sharing_permissions.go`) delegates to `project.CanRead(s, a)` — i.e. any user with read access to the project passes. The response serializes the `hash` field (`pkg/models/link_sharing.go`, field tag `json:"hash"`), which is the share's bearer credential. The share `password` field is correctly cleared before returning, but the hash is not restricted. Inconsistent with the sibling list endpoint `GET /projects/{project}/shares` (`LinkSharing.ReadAll`, `pkg/models/link_sharing.go:243-256`), which requires `project.IsAdmin` — the protection level the project chose when the class was fixed for the list endpoint in 2.3.0 (GHSA-8hp8). The v1 and v2 APIs share the same model-level gate (the v2 `handler.DoReadOne` wrappers call the same `CanRead`), so both surfaces are affected. Impact chain: hash -> `POST /api/v1/shares/{hash}/auth` (unauthenticated by design) -> link-share JWT at the share's permission level -> full API access at that level for that project. Mitigating factors: the attacker must already be a member of the project at read level; password-protected shares (sharing_type=2) still require the password at the auth step; share IDs are small sequential integers and enumerable by members. ## PoC Steps below use two accounts: the owner (token `$OWNER`) and an attacker who has been granted read-only access to the project (token `$READER`). All requests were executed against a local Vikunja 2.5.0 instance. 1. Owner creates a private project and a read-write link share (permission=1): ``` curl -X PUT "$BASE/api/v1/projects" -H "Authorization: Bearer $OWNER" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"title":"poc"}' # -> {"id":123,...} curl -X PUT "$BASE/api/v1/projects/123/shares" -H "Authorization: Bearer $OWNER" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"name":"poc","permission":1}' # -> {"id":7,"hash":"<SECRET_HASH>",...} ``` 2. Owner adds the attacker as a read-only member (permission=0): ``` curl -X PUT "$BASE/api/v1/projects/123/users" -H "Authorization: Bearer $OWNER" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"username":"attacker","permission":0}' ``` 3. Attacker reads the single share — the weak gate — and receives the hash (this is the disclosure; the list endpoint would correctly return 403 here): ``` curl "$BASE/api/v1/projects/123/shares/7" -H "Authorization: Bearer $READER" # -> 200 {"id":7,"hash":"<SECRET_HASH>","permission":1,...} # v2 twin behaves identically: curl "$BASE/api/v2/projects/123/shares/7" -H "Authorization: Bearer $READER" # -> 200 {"hash":"<SECRET_HASH>",...} ``` 4. Attacker exchanges the hash for a link-share JWT (no authentication required): ``` curl -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/shares/<SECRET_HASH>/auth" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' # -> 200 {"token":"<LINK_JWT>",...} ``` 5. Negative control — the attacker's own user token cannot write to the project: ``` curl -X PUT "$BASE/api/v1/projects/123/tasks" -H "Authorization: Bearer $READER" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"title":"direct"}' # -> 403 Forbidden ``` 6. Escalation proof — the link-share JWT writes successfully: ``` curl -X PUT "$BASE/api/v1/projects/123/tasks" -H "Authorization: Bearer <LINK_JWT>" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"title":"escalated"}' # -> 201 Created ``` Observed result: steps 3, 4 and 6 all succeed (200 / 200 / 201) while step 5 is refused with 403 — the read-only member has escalated to write access. If the project has an admin-level share (permission=2), the same chain yields project-admin capabilities (member management is still refused for link principals, but project settings, shares of the project, and all write operations become available). ## Impact Broken access control / privilege escalation within shared projects (CWE-862, CWE-639: the link-share hash is a bearer capability disclosed to a lesser-privileged member; CWE-200 for the information exposure). Any read-level member of a project tha | GCVE Database | |||
| High | 7.5 | EPSS 0.5% | High7.5EPSS 0.5%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-75346 An out-of-bounds read vulnerability in EIPStackGroup OpENer v2.3 and master through commit 76b95cf affects the server-side CIP SetAttributeList service. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition. The vulnerability is identified as CVE-2026-75346 and has a high severity rating with a CVSS score of 7.5. | GCVE Database | ||
| High | 7.1 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-108158mynaparrot plugNmeet-server · Path Traversal High7.1EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-108158 plugNmeet Server versions up to 2.5.2 have a path traversal vulnerability in the whiteboard conversion endpoint. This flaw allows any meeting participant to read arbitrary server files by supplying crafted filePath values containing ../ sequences. The vulnerability enables attackers to convert text or office documents into page images and then retrieve them without authentication via the /download/uploadedFile/ endpoint. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 5.3 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-108111ageerle ruoyi-ai · Missing Authorization Medium5.3EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-108111 ruoyi-ai versions 3.0.0 through 3.1.0 have a missing authorization vulnerability in the GET /workflow/search endpoint. Authenticated non-admin users can access this endpoint, which does not filter by owner or public status, allowing them to view private workflows of other users within the same tenant. The exposed data includes workflow UUIDs and full node and edge configurations. The vulnerability has a medium severity with a CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 6.8 | EPSS 0.1% | CVE-2026-102916illumos-gate · Reachable Assertion Medium6.8EPSS 0.1%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-102916 CVE-2026-102916 is a reachable assertion vulnerability in the illumos bhyve instruction emulator that allows a guest VM to cause the host to panic. The issue arises when emulating REP-prefixed MOVS or STOS instructions accessing guest MMIO, where a status flag is not cleared properly, leading to a VERIFY assertion failure and host panic. A privileged user inside a guest VM can exploit this to cause denial of service to the host and all other guests. The flaw has existed since 2020 and affects illumos distributions prior to a specific commit fixing the issue. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Unrated | – | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2025-68296linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-ibm, linux-lowlatency, linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8, linux-nvidia, linux-nvidia-6.8 UnratedEPSS 0.2%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2025-68296 Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel. An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system. This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems: - ARM32 architecture; - ARM64 architecture; - MIPS architecture; - x86 architecture; - Intel NPU Driver; - Auxiliary display drivers; - Compressed RAM block device driver; - GPIO subsystem; - GPU drivers; - HID subsystem; - I2C subsystem; - IIO subsystem; - InfiniBand drivers; - Input Device core drivers; - Input Device (Mouse) drivers; - Multiple devices driver; - Media drivers; - Fastrpc Driver; - Ethernet bonding driver; - Network drivers; - Mellanox network drivers; - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver; - Texas Instruments network drivers; - NVMEM (Non Volatile Memory) drivers; - Parport drivers; - SCSI subsystem; - SLIMbus drivers; - NVIDIA Tegra SoC drivers; - SPI subsystem; - Trusted Execution Environment drivers; - Thunderbolt and USB4 drivers; - TTY drivers; - USB Device Class drivers; - DesignWare USB2 driver; - USB Gadget drivers; - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller drivers; - USB Serial drivers; - USB Type-C support driver; - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager driver; - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver; - USB over IP driver; - Framebuffer layer; - Ext4 file system; - FUSE (File system in Userspace); - File systems infrastructure; - SMB network file system; - Mellanox drivers; - Network traffic control; - Bluetooth subsystem; - IPv4 networking; - Netfilter; - IPv6 networking; - Network sockets; - XFRM subsystem; - IPC subsystem; - Signal handling mechanism; - Memory management; - 6LoWPAN network protocol; - IEEE 802 network protocols; - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol; - Ethernet bridge; - Networking core; - Devlink API; - Ethtool driver; - Handshake API; - HSR network protocol; - IEEE802154.4 network protocol; - IUCV driver; - L2TP protocol; - MAC80211 subsystem; - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP); - Multipath TCP; - NetLabel subsystem; - NFC subsystem; - Open vSwitch; - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR); - RDS protocol; - RxRPC session sockets; - SCTP protocol; - SMC sockets; - VMware vSockets driver; - Wireless networking; - ALSA framework; - Simple audio multiplexer codec driver; - Wolfson Microelectronics audio codecs; - KVM subsystem; (CVE-2025-68296, CVE-2025-68768, CVE-2026-23346, CVE-2026-31663, CVE-2026-43116, CVE-2026-43219, CVE-2026-43240, CVE-2026-43303, CVE-2026-43311, CVE-2026-43331, CVE-2026-45850, CVE-2026-45930, CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322, CVE-2026-52908, CVE-2026-52910, CVE-2026-52913, CVE-2026-52917, CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52927, CVE-2026-52929, CVE-2026-52930, CVE-2026-52934, CVE-2026-52935, CVE-2026-52939, CVE-2026-52942, CVE-2026-52943, CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52947, CVE-2026-52948, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53132, CVE-2026-53133, CVE-2026-53134, CVE-2026-53135, CVE-2026-53136, CVE-2026-53137, CVE-2026-53138, CVE-2026-53140, CVE-2026-53143, CVE-2026-53144, CVE-2026-53146, CVE-2026-53147, CVE-2026-53148, CVE-2026-53149, CVE-2026-53150, CVE-2026-53154, CVE-2026-53156, CVE-2026-53158, CVE-2026-53159, CVE-2026-53160, CVE-2026-53161, CVE-2026-53168, CVE-2026-53177, CVE-2026-53181, CVE-2026-53182, CVE-2026-53183, CVE-2026-53184, CVE-2026-53185, CVE-2026-53190, CVE-2026-53194, CVE-2026-53195, CVE-2026-53196, CVE-2026-53198, CVE-2026-53199, CVE-2026-53202, CVE-2026-53205, CVE-2026-53208, CVE-2026-53209, CVE-2026-53210, CVE-2026-53213, CVE-2026-53214, CVE-2026-53217, CVE-2026-53218, CVE-2026-53219, CVE-2026-53220, CVE-2026-53223, CVE-2026-53227, CVE-2026-53229, CVE-2026-53230, CVE-2026-53232, CVE-2026-53236, CVE-2026-53237, CVE-2026-53238, CVE-2026-53239, CVE-2026-53242, CVE-2026-53245, CVE-2026-53249, CVE-2026-53251, CVE-2026-53252, CVE-2026-53253, CVE-2026-53254, CVE-2026-53255, CVE-2026-53256, CVE-2026-53261, CVE-2026-53262, CVE-2026-53263, CVE-2026-53264, CVE-2026-53265, CVE-2026-53266, CVE-2026-53267, CVE-2026-53268, CVE-2026-53269, CVE-2026-53270, CVE-2026-53273, CVE-2026-53274, CVE-2026-53275, CVE-2026-53329, CVE-2026-53331, CVE-2026-53332, CVE-2026-53336, CVE-2026-53337, CVE-2026-53339, CVE-2026-53343, CVE-2026-53345, CVE-2026-53347, CVE-2026-53349, CVE-2026-53350, CVE-2026-53352, CVE-2026-53353, CVE-2026-53356, CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-63867, CVE-2026-63868, CVE-2026-63869, CVE-2026-63870, CVE-2026-63871, CVE-2026-63875, CVE-2026-63876, CVE-2026-63877, CVE-2026-63881, CVE-2026-63882, CVE-2026-63883, CVE-2026-63884, CVE-2026-63889, CVE-2026-63890, CVE-2026-63891, CVE-2026-63892, CVE-2026-63893, CVE-2026-63895, CVE-2026-63896, CVE-2026-63897, CVE-2026-63898, CVE-2026-63899, CVE-2026-63900, CVE-2026-63901, CVE-2026-63902, CVE-2026-63903, CVE-2026-63904, CVE-2026-63905, CVE-2026-63906, CVE-2026-63908, CVE-2026-63909, CVE-2026-63913, CVE-2026-63914, CVE-202 | GCVE Database | ||
| Medium | 6.7 | EPSS <0.1% | CVE-2026-19571zephyrproject zephyr · Race Medium6.7EPSS <0.1%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-19571 The ITE IT8xxx2 SHI host-command backend (subsys/mgmt/ec_host_cmd/backends/ec_host_cmd_backend_shi_ite.c) copied the 8-byte host-command request header from the SPI Rx FIFO directly into the shared receive buffer data->in_msg and only afterwards checked the protocol version and the derived packet length. The interrupt handler also accepted a chip-select assertion and an Rx-valid-length (RVLI) interrupt in any driver state other than SHI_STATE_DISABLED, so a new header could be parsed while the host-command thread was still processing the previous request out of the very same buffer. The host processor is the SPI controller and drives both chip select and the clock. After sending a well-formed request it can immediately de-assert chip select — which returns the driver to the ready state and re-enables the FIFO — and start a second transaction carrying a header with data_len = 0xFFFF. Those eight bytes are written into in_msg before the oversized length is rejected, so they land in a buffer whose contents verify_rx() in subsys/mgmt/ec_host_cmd/ec_host_cmd_handler.c has already validated. If this lands in the window before the host-command thread executes args.input_buf_size = rx_header->data_len, the framework hands the registered command handler a 65535-byte input length over a 256-byte buffer. The result is an out-of-bounds read of up to roughly 64 KiB beyond the request buffer: command handlers that copy or echo input_buf_size bytes disclose adjacent embedded-controller memory back to the host or overflow the response buffer, and a read past the end of SRAM faults the controller. The same race also allows cmd_id and cmd_ver to be swapped after checksum verification and after handler lookup. Exploitation requires the ability to drive the inter-processor SHI bus (a compromised host OS or physical access to the SPI lines) and winning a timing race, which the SPI controller can retry indefinitely. The fix parses the header into a local struct ec_host_cmd_request_header and copies it into in_msg only after the length has been bounded by sizeof(data->in_msg), and ignores chip-select and RVLI interrupts outside SHI_STATE_READY_TO_RECV/SHI_STATE_RECEIVING. A residual, bounded race remains: an end-of-transaction interrupt still resets the state to ready while the host-command thread owns the buffer, so a valid second request can still overwrite the in-flight request's contents, unlike the NPCX backend which parks in SHI_STATE_CNL_RESP_NOT_RDY while the buffer is in use. EPSS <0.1%Vulnerability | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 8.8 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-19570zephyrproject zephyr · Memory-safety High8.8EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-19570 The LE Audio Broadcast Sink in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_sink.c copies subgroup metadata from a received Basic Audio Announcement (BASE) into the static Broadcast Audio Scan Service parameter structure mod_src_param without any bounds check. In base_subgroup_meta_cb() the destination element was selected as mod_src_param.subgroups[mod_src_param.num_subgroups] with no test against ARRAY_SIZE(mod_src_param.subgroups) (sized by CONFIG_BT_BAP_BASS_MAX_SUBGROUPS, default 1), and the metadata was copied with memcpy() using the raw on-air length returned by bt_bap_base_get_subgroup_codec_meta() into a metadata array sized by CONFIG_BT_AUDIO_CODEC_CFG_MAX_METADATA_SIZE (default 4). The BASE validator bt_bap_base_get_base_from_ad() only checks structural consistency and permits up to ~24 subgroups and metadata LTVs of ~240 octets. The defect is reached from the periodic advertising receive callback: pa_recv() → bt_data_parse() → pa_decode_base() → update_recv_state_base() → bt_bap_base_foreach_subgroup() → base_subgroup_meta_cb(). Every broadcast sink registers a scan-delegator receive state at creation (bt_bap_broadcast_sink_create() calls broadcast_sink_add_src()), and CONFIG_BT_BAP_BROADCAST_SINK depends on CONFIG_BT_BAP_SCAN_DELEGATOR, so the path is active in every broadcast-sink build once the device is periodic-advertising-synced. An attacker in radio range who operates a broadcast source the device syncs to — or who impersonates the advertiser address and SID of one already in use, periodic advertising data being unauthenticated — can change the BASE at will; each new BASE is re-parsed. A crafted BASE therefore writes attacker-chosen bytes past the end of a fixed static object in .bss: up to roughly 236 bytes for an oversized metadata LTV, plus whole struct bt_bap_bass_subgroup records for each subgroup beyond CONFIG_BT_BAP_BASS_MAX_SUBGROUPS. This is memory corruption of adjacent Bluetooth-audio state reachable with no pairing, bonding or GATT connection, with a potential for remote code execution in the Bluetooth RX thread; in addition, the unvalidated metadata_len is forwarded to bt_bap_scan_delegator_mod_src(), which neither clamps it nor rejects it, leading to a further copy into the receive state and to out-of-bounds memory being disclosed in the BASS receive-state notification sent to a connected Broadcast Assistant. The fix rejects a BASE carrying more subgroups than the receive state can hold (discarding the update entirely) and omits metadata that does not fit rather than copying it, and additionally honours the previously-ignored error return of the subgroup decode pass. EPSS 0.3%Vulnerability | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | – | EPSS 0.2% | MediumEPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-98375 CVE-2026-98375 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's xen/netfront driver where RX packets with a short Ethernet header are not properly handled. This can cause a kernel BUG due to improper processing of packets shorter than the Ethernet header length. The issue arises because the length of the first RX slot is not checked against the Ethernet header length, leading to potential memory access errors. The vulnerability has been fixed by ensuring that at least the Ethernet header length is pulled from the packet and dropping packets that are too short. EPSS 0.2%Vulnerability | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 5.8 | Medium5.8GCVE Database Coraza v3 has a vulnerability where it fails to inspect URL-encoded form bodies if the Content-Type header includes media-type parameters such as charset=UTF-8. This causes Coraza to skip parsing the request body, allowing attackers to bypass custom rules inspecting POST arguments. The issue affects versions from 3.0.4 up to but not including 3.8.1. The vulnerability is rated medium severity with a CVSS score of 5.8. A patch is available to address this issue. | GCVE Database | |||
| Medium | 6.4 | EPSS 0.1% | CVE-2026-107292pydantic-ai · Origin Validation Error Medium6.4EPSS 0.1%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-107292 CVE-2026-107292 is an origin validation error in pydantic-ai affecting versions from 1.34.0 up to but not including 2.30.0. The vulnerability allows DNS rebinding attacks via the Host header in the Agent.to_web() and clai web chat server, enabling a malicious website to interact with a loopback-hosted agent as a same-origin service. This can lead to unauthorized execution of agent tools with local process privileges, causing data disclosure and unwanted side effects. The issue is fixed in versions 1.107.5 and 2.30.0. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 7.8 | EPSS 0.1% | High7.8EPSS 0.1%GCVE DatabaseCVE-2026-23103 The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. Security Fix(es): * kernel: ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port (CVE-2026-23103) * kernel: KVM: SEV: Require in-GHCB scratch area if GHCB v2+ is in use (CVE-2026-53360) * kernel: vsock/virtio: fix zerocopy completion for multi-skb sends (CVE-2026-53365) * kernel: NFSD: Fix SECINFO_NO_NAME decode error cleanup (CVE-2026-53398) * kernel: vsock/virtio: bind uarg before filling zerocopy skb (CVE-2026-63970) * kernel: igc: set tx buffer type for SMD frames (CVE-2026-64035) * kernel: idpf: fix read_dev_clk_lock spinlock init in idpf_ptp_init() (CVE-2026-64162) * kernel: vsock/vmci: fix UAF when peer resets connection during handshake (CVE-2026-64115) * kernel: SUNRPC: pin upper rpc_clnt across the TLS connect_worker (CVE-2026-72317) * kernel: ipvlan: inherit needed_headroom and needed_tailroom from phy_dev (CVE-2026-74744) * kernel: nfsd: defer vfree of compound ops to fix rpc_status UAF (CVE-2026-89690) * kernel: nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it (CVE-2026-89669) * kernel: svcrdma: Reject inline replies that overflow the pull-up buffer (CVE-2026-89530) * kernel: nfsd: revoke copy-notify stateids before dropping their reference (CVE-2026-89663) Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s): * "iavf: refactor iavf_clean_rx_irq to support legacy and flex descriptors" broke rx-vlan-offload on rhel-9.7 [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:RHEL-169480) * [GNR-D] missing interfaces tspll_cfg (JIRA:RHEL-183201) * RHEL9.8z KVM guest panicked in vmmouse driver (JIRA:RHEL-186577) * Add Epson RX8111 support to RHEL9.9 [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:RHEL-212014) * RT scheduler livelock: migrate-disabled task at pushable-list head causes repeated RT push/stopper retries, starving a critical RT task (remaining issue after CVE-2026-45919 fix in 94894c9c477e) [rhel-9.8.z] (JIRA:RHEL-256279) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section. | GCVE Database | ||
| Malicious | – | MaliciousGCVE Database The npm package @bellaxchuu/familyxtrx version 0.1.5 is part of a large family of malicious forks of the Baileys WhatsApp Web library. These forks inject code that silently subscribes the victim's authenticated WhatsApp account to attacker-controlled channels without user consent. The target channels are obfuscated or dynamically fetched, allowing attackers to change targets post-installation. The malicious code abuses the installer's authenticated session but does not steal credentials, maintain persistence, or execute arbitrary remote code. | GCVE Database |
Page 14 of 101 · 3 duplicate CVE records merged