Threat database
10 threats
Most recently published first
| Severity | CVSS | Signals | Threat | Source | Published | Score and star |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | 5.1 | EPSS 0.4% | CVE-2026-112148LY LIFF SDK · Cross-site Scripting Medium5.1EPSS 0.4%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-112148 A vulnerability has been identified in LIFF SDK versions 2.20.0 through 2.31.0, where a DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of an affected LIFF application's endpoint when a user opens a specially crafted URL in an external browser, potentially leading to disclosure of JavaScript-accessible authentication tokens or application data, or unauthorized actions using the user's session. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Critical | 9.1 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-11751LY Armeria · CWE-295 Critical9.1EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-11751 CVE-2026-11751 is a critical vulnerability in LY Corporation's Armeria product affecting armeria-xds versions prior to 1.41.0. The flaw involves the silent disabling of TLS peer verification for xDS upstream connections, which could allow man-in-the-middle attacks. This vulnerability is identified as CWE-295 and has a CVSS 4.0 score of 9.1, indicating high impact and exploitability under certain conditions. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 8.4 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-13133LY LINE for Windows · CWE-427 High8.4EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-13133 A high-severity vulnerability (CWE-427) exists in LINE for Windows prior to version 26.4.0, where the application loads Msftedit.dll using a relative path without a secure DLL search path. This allows an attacker to place a malicious DLL in the installer's directory, which may be loaded instead of the legitimate system DLL. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 8.7 | EPSS 0.4% | CVE-2026-16881LY LINE client for Android · Code Injection High8.7EPSS 0.4%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-16881 CVE-2026-16881 is a code injection vulnerability in the LINE Android app prior to version 26.7.2. The flaw exists in the profile rendering component, which does not properly validate or sandbox script content embedded in profile templates. This allows an attacker who can place crafted content in a profile to execute unintended code with the app's privileges when a victim views that profile. A server-side mitigation has been deployed that protects even unpatched Android clients. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 6.9 | EPSS 0.6% | CVE-2026-11748LY Central Dogma · CWE-90 Medium6.9EPSS 0.6%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-11748 # Vulnerability `SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm.findUserDn()` substitutes the user-supplied username from the login form into an LDAP search filter template (default `cn={0}`) **without escaping RFC 4515 filter metacharacters** (`*`, `(`, `)`, `\`, NUL). Combined with `SearchControls.setCountLimit(1)` on the same call site, this allows three distinct attack primitives: 1. **Authentication confusion** — typing username `*` causes the realm to construct filter `cn=*`, return the first directory entry (typically a privileged account in AD ordering), and attempt bind against that DN with the attacker's password. 2. **Audit log evasion** — payload `bob)(uid=alice` is recorded verbatim in audit logs while the realm searches with the malformed filter, breaking accountability/compliance (SOX, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001). 3. **Directory enumeration** — wildcards and timing differences allow reconnaissance of OU structure and admin group membership. A repo-wide search for any LDAP escape helper (`escapeLdap`, `encodeFilter`, `escapeFilter`, `ldapEscape`) returns **zero hits** — the defense is not just missing, it was never added. > **Applicability note:** This realm is opt-in. The shipped default LDAP example (`dist/src/conf/shiro.example.ldap.ini`) uses Shiro's `DefaultLdapRealm` with `userDnTemplate` and is **NOT** affected. However, the realm exists precisely to support Active Directory environments where users log in via `sAMAccountName` and the realm must search for the DN first — the canonical LINE corporate AD-backed SSO scenario. Internal deployments using AD-backed login almost certainly select this realm. --- ## Evidence **File:** `server-auth/shiro/src/main/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/auth/shiro/realm/SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm.java` **Lines 148–176** on branch `main` @ commit `d64a5151`: ```java @Nullable protected String findUserDn(LdapContextFactory ldapContextFactory, String username) throws NamingException { LdapContext ctx = null; try { ctx = ldapContextFactory.getSystemLdapContext(); final SearchControls ctrl = new SearchControls(); ctrl.setCountLimit(1); // line 156 — returns FIRST match only ctrl.setSearchScope(SearchControls.SUBTREE_SCOPE); ctrl.setTimeLimit(searchTimeoutMillis); final String filter = searchFilter != null ? USERNAME_PLACEHOLDER.matcher(searchFilter) .replaceAll(username) // line 162 — RAW SUBSTITUTION : username; // line 163 final NamingEnumeration result = ctx.search(searchBase, filter, ctrl); ... ``` `USERNAME_PLACEHOLDER = Pattern.compile("\\{0}")`. Default `searchFilter = "cn={0}"`. ### Data flow from HTTP login to vulnerable substitution | Step | Component | |------|-----------| | HTTP login form | `POST /api/v1/login` form field `username` | | `ShiroLoginService.usernamePassword()` (lines 198–223) | applies `loginNameNormalizer` (Unicode lowercase only — **NOT** LDAP escape) | | `Subject.login(new UsernamePasswordToken(username, password))` | Shiro hand-off | | `ActiveDirectoryRealm.doGetAuthenticationInfo` (Shiro core) | calls `queryForAuthenticationInfo0` | | `SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm.findUserDn(factory, upToken.getUsername())` | username flows in **verbatim** | ### Repository-wide escape helper grep | Search term | Hits | |-------------|------| | `escapeLdap` | 0 | | `encodeFilter` | 0 | | `escapeFilter` | 0 | | `ldapEscape` | 0 | --- ## PoC Self-contained JUnit 5 test using UnboundID `InMemoryDirectoryServer` (in-process, no external LDAP required). Drop into `server-auth/shiro/src/test/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/auth/shiro/realm/LdapInjectionPoCTest.java` and add `com.unboundid:unboundid-ldapsdk:7.0.0` as a test dependency. > The PoC works by subclassing the realm and overriding `findUserDn()` to capture the actual LDAP filter string sent to the directory — the captured filter is the structural evidence, independent of LDAP server strictness about bind outcomes. ```java /* * Copyright 2026 LINE Corporation * * SECURITY PoC — NOT FOR MERGE INTO THE MAIN TEST SUITE. * * This JUnit class demonstrates the LDAP filter injection in * SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm. Drop into * server-auth/shiro/src/test/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/auth/shiro/realm/ * Adds the UnboundID LDAP SDK as a test dep. */ package com.linecorp.centraldogma.server.auth.shiro.realm; import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy; import javax.naming.directory.SearchControls; import javax.naming.ldap.LdapContext; import org.apache.shiro.realm.ldap.JndiLdapContextFactory; import org.apache.shiro.realm.ldap.LdapContextFactory; import org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll; import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll; | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Critical | 9.4 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-11746LY Central Dogma · CWE-798 Critical9.4EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-11746 ## Vulnerability `ZooKeeperReplicationConfig.secret()` silently substitutes the hard-coded constant `"ch4n63m3"` (leetspeak for "change me") whenever the operator omits `replication.secret`. The same secret is wired into both the **client-facing SASL context** and the **quorum/learner SASL contexts** of the embedded ZooKeeper. The constant is in OSS source on GitHub and is discoverable via code search in seconds. ### Three Reinforcing Defects 1. **OSS-public credential** — `DEFAULT_SECRET` is in `line/centraldogma` source. 2. **Silent fallback** — `firstNonNull(convertValue(...), DEFAULT_SECRET)` substitutes the default with no log, no warning, no startup banner. The only sanity check `checkArgument(!secret().isEmpty(), ...)` passes because the getter substitutes the literal before the emptiness check runs. 3. **Dual-purpose secret** — used for both ZK client-port super auth and inter-peer quorum SASL. A single leaked password authenticates against both surfaces. ### Architecture Context (Important) Central Dogma does **NOT** connect to an external ZooKeeper ensemble. Each replica embeds a `QuorumPeer` (`EmbeddedZooKeeper extends QuorumPeer`) inside its own JVM. The Central Dogma cluster **IS** the ZK ensemble. So the "ZK network" is the inter-replica network of the Central Dogma cluster itself. ### Applicability | `replication.method` | ZK Started? | Applicable? | |---|---|---| | `NONE` (standalone, dev default) | No | **NOT applicable** | | `ZOOKEEPER` (HA production) | Yes, embedded on every replica | **Fully applicable** — canonical production configuration | --- ## Evidence **File:** `server/src/main/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/ZooKeeperReplicationConfig.java` **Branch:** `main` @ commit `d64a5151` **Line 53** — the constant: ```java private static final String DEFAULT_SECRET = "ch4n63m3"; ``` **Lines 210–215** — the silent fallback: ```java /** * Returns the secret string used for authenticating the ZooKeeper peers. */ public String secret() { return firstNonNull(convertValue(secret, "replication.secret"), DEFAULT_SECRET); } ``` --- **File:** `server/src/main/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/internal/replication/ZooKeeperCommandExecutor.java` **Lines 586–607** — JAAS wiring (same secret on both surfaces): ```java final String escapedSecret = jaasValueEscaper.escape(cfg.secret()); ImmutableList.of("Server", EmbeddedZooKeeper.SASL_SERVER_LOGIN_CONTEXT).forEach(name -> { buf.append(name).append(" {").append(newline); buf.append(DigestLoginModule.class.getName()).append(" required").append(newline); buf.append("user_super=\"").append(escapedSecret).append("\";").append(newline); buf.append("};").append(newline); }); ImmutableList.of("Client", EmbeddedZooKeeper.SASL_LEARNER_LOGIN_CONTEXT).forEach(name -> { buf.append(name).append(" {").append(newline); buf.append(DigestLoginModule.class.getName()).append(" required").append(newline); buf.append("username=\"super\"").append(newline); buf.append("password=\"").append(escapedSecret).append("\";").append(newline); buf.append("};").append(newline); }); ``` --- **File:** `server/src/main/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/internal/replication/EmbeddedZooKeeper.java` **Line 44** — proves CD embeds the ZK server: ```java final class EmbeddedZooKeeper extends QuorumPeer { ``` **Lines 213–220** — client port binding (loopback only): ```java private static ServerCnxnFactory createCnxnFactory(QuorumPeerConfig zkCfg) throws IOException { final InetSocketAddress bindAddr = zkCfg.getClientPortAddress(); final ServerCnxnFactory cnxnFactory = ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(); // Listen only on 127.0.0.1 because we do not want to expose ZooKeeper to others. cnxnFactory.configure(new InetSocketAddress("127.0.0.1", bindAddr != null ? bindAddr.getPort() : 0), zkCfg.getMaxClientCnxns()); return cnxnFactory; } ``` > Quorum/election ports are **NOT** loopback-bound — they bind to `replication.servers[].host` as configured, exposed on the inter-replica network. --- ## PoC Two attack surfaces, two scenarios. **Surface A** (client port, same-host) is implemented as a working read-only PoC. **Surface B** (quorum-port peer impersonation) is documented but intentionally not weaponized. ### Surface A — Same-Host Client Port (Loopback) PoC Python + kazoo + pure-sasl. Authenticates as `super` over SASL DIGEST-MD5 with the leaked secret and reads the full Central Dogma replication log. Hardcoded to `127.0.0.1`, read-only, prints first 5 entries. ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ C3 PoC -- ZooKeeper default-secret takeover (read-only, loopback only). Demonstrates that a Central Dogma instance launched with a ZooKeeper-replicated configuration but without `replication.secret` set exposes its embedded ZooKeeper to anyone with local-host access, using the well-known credential `super / ch4n63m3`. SAFETY: * Hardcoded to 127.0.0.1. Refuses any other targ | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 8.8 | EPSS 0.2% | CVE-2026-11745LY Central Dogma · CWE-322 High8.8EPSS 0.2%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-11745 # Vulnerability Central Dogma's Git mirror SSH client installs an Apache MINA SSHD `ServerKeyVerifier` lambda that returns `true` unconditionally for every outbound SSH connection used by `git+ssh://` mirrors. The accompanying lines disable the `known_hosts` and `~/.ssh/config` fallbacks, and a repo-wide search confirms that no host-key pinning mechanism (no `acceptedHostKeys`, `knownHosts`, `KnownHostsServerKeyVerifier`, `StaticServerKeyVerifier`, or `RequiredServerKeyVerifier`) exists anywhere in `server-mirror-git/`. Operators have no opt-in way to enable verification. Every outbound mirror connection blindly trusts whatever host key the remote presents. ## Evidence File: `server-mirror-git/src/main/java/com/linecorp/centraldogma/server/internal/mirror/SshGitMirror.java` Lines 143-160 (especially 149) on branch `main` @ commit `d64a5151`: ```java private SshClient createSshClient() { final ClientBuilder builder = ClientBuilder.builder(); // Do not use local file system. builder.hostConfigEntryResolver(HostConfigEntryResolver.EMPTY); // line 146 builder.fileSystemFactory(NoneFileSystemFactory.INSTANCE); // line 147 // Do not verify the server key. builder.serverKeyVerifier((clientSession, remoteAddress, serverKey) -> true); // line 149 ... } ``` Verification: - Read confirmed on 2026-05-21 against `main` @ `d64a5151`. - A multi-agent code audit verified that no operator-facing pinning field exists on `SshKeyCredential`, `PasswordCredential`, or `MirrorContext`. - Exploit PoC reproduced locally with a `paramiko`-based fake SSH server bound to 127.0.0.1. The fake server presents an ephemeral RSA host key never seen before; the Central Dogma mirror client accepts the connection and proceeds to authentication, logging the offered username and public-key fingerprint. A correctly hardened SSH client would refuse the connection before reaching the authentication phase. - Full PoC artifacts (read-only, loopback-only) at `~/centraldogma-poc/C1_ssh_hostkey_bypass/` on the reporter's workstation. ## Impact Threat model: An on-path attacker on the corporate network — ARP spoofing on the LAN, internal DNS poisoning, malicious internal DNS overriding `github.com` or the configured internal git hostname, BGP hijack, sidecar/CNI compromise in Kubernetes, or any process able to answer TCP on the resolved IP. No Central Dogma account required; only network position. 1. **Direction `LOCAL_TO_REMOTE`**: the attacker impersonating the remote git server receives the entire mirrored repository contents over the SSH session. Central Dogma is a configuration store, so this typically exfiltrates DB credentials, third-party API keys, certificates, feature flags, and any other secret configuration committed to mirrored repositories. 2. **Direction `REMOTE_TO_LOCAL`**: the attacker can serve arbitrary commits which Central Dogma materializes into the local repo and then broadcasts to every subscribing microservice via the watch API. This is a supply-chain root-of-trust compromise across all downstream services consuming Central Dogma configuration. 3. **Credential theft chain with finding H2** (mirror credentials are not bound to a hostname): an SSH key or access token configured for `github.com` can be captured by the attacker's fake server and replayed against the real upstream, extending impact beyond Central Dogma itself. Scope is `Changed` (CVSS) because exploitation alters trust assumptions of every downstream client of Central Dogma, not just Central Dogma itself. ## How to fix 1. Add an `acceptedHostKeys: List<String>` field to `SshKeyCredential` and `PasswordCredential` (or to `MirrorContext`). Values are SHA-256 fingerprints of trusted remote SSH server host keys, e.g. `SHA256:nThbg6kXUpJWGl7E1IGOCspRomTxdCARLviKw6E5SY8`. 2. Replace the accept-all lambda at `SshGitMirror.java:149` with a verifier that computes the SHA-256 fingerprint of the presented host key and compares it against the credential's allowlist using a constant-time comparison. 3. Refuse to connect when `acceptedHostKeys` is empty — fail-closed. Do not implement implicit TOFU. 4. Optionally provide an admin-only `dogma mirror probe-host-key <remote>` tool that performs a single audited connection, prints the server's fingerprint, and prompts the operator to add it to the credential. This makes TOFU an explicit, audited operation. 5. Update `SshGitMirrorTest.java` and `it/mirror/*` tests to pin a test fingerprint or use the explicit trust-once tool, so the regression cannot silently return. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 5.9 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-11752LY Armeria · CWE-73 Medium5.9EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-11752 A vulnerability has been identified in armeria-xds versions 1.38.0 through 1.39.0, where DataSourceStream in the xDS module can resolve control-plane-supplied filenames and environment variables without restriction, allowing a compromised or semi-trusted xDS control plane to read arbitrary local files and environment variables on the xDS client host. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| High | 7.1 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2026-3861LY LINE client for iOS · CWE-400 High7.1EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2026-3861 LINE client for iOS versions prior to 26.3.0 contains a vulnerability in the in-app browser where opening a crafted web page can repeatedly trigger OS-level dialogs due to insufficient safeguards when handling arbitrary URL schemes, potentially causing the iOS device to become temporarily inoperable. | CVE Database V5 | ||
| Medium | 4.3 | EPSS 0.3% | CVE-2025-41408LY "Yahoo! Shopping" App for Android · Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme Medium4.3EPSS 0.3%CVE Database V5CVE-2025-41408 Improper authorization in handler for custom URL scheme issue in "Yahoo! Shopping" App for Android versions prior to 14.15.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker may lead a user to access an arbitrary website on the vulnerable App. As a result, the user may become a victim of a phishing attack. | CVE Database V5 |
Page 1 of 1