Almost Half of Malware Samples Communicate Direct to IP
Analysis of 4 million dynamic malware reports shows that nearly half of malware samples with command-and-control (C2) activity use direct-to-IP (D2IP) connections, bypassing DNS and evading DNS-based defenses. D2IP accounts for over 23% of all C2 attempts and is observed in diverse malware families including ransomware droppers, data exfiltration campaigns, and IoT botnets. The research proposes a zero trust IP (ZT-IP) enforcement approach to block unauthorized outbound IP connections that are not sanctioned by DNS responses.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
This research analyzes 4 million dynamic malware reports and finds that 45.32% of malware samples exhibiting command-and-control activity establish direct-to-IP (D2IP) connections, completely bypassing DNS resolution. This evasion technique undermines traditional DNS-based security controls. D2IP traffic constitutes 23.17% of all C2 connection attempts. The behavior is present across multiple malware types such as Phorpiex ransomware droppers with hard-coded IPs, persistent data exfiltration campaigns using obfuscated HTTP GET requests, SectopRAT targeting educational institutions with in-browser proxy capabilities, and IoT botnets like Mozi and Boatnet propagating via peer-to-peer networks. The study introduces zero trust IP (ZT-IP), a network-level enforcement mechanism that validates outbound connection destinations against previously authorized DNS responses to block malicious D2IP communications.
Potential Impact
Malware using direct-to-IP connections can evade DNS-based detection and blocking mechanisms, increasing the difficulty of identifying and mitigating command-and-control communications. This technique enables persistent and stealthy malware operations including ransomware deployment, data exfiltration, and botnet propagation. The widespread use of D2IP across diverse malware families and attack vectors highlights a significant gap in traditional network security defenses relying on DNS monitoring.
Mitigation Recommendations
No official patch or vendor advisory is available for this behavior as it is a malware communication technique rather than a software vulnerability. The research proposes implementing zero trust IP (ZT-IP) network enforcement, which restricts outbound connections to IP addresses previously authorized by DNS responses. Organizations should consider deploying network-level controls that verify IP destinations against DNS resolutions to detect and block unauthorized direct-to-IP communications. This approach complements existing DNS-based security controls and addresses the evasion technique described.
Indicators of Compromise
- ip: 103.245.236.146
- ip: 154.92.19.71
- ip: 178.16.54.109
- ip: 91.92.243.29
- hash: 083d5895283755a910b5c59d60a5348b
- hash: 0d94bf4d0418061907ff7977e3f25a463cb25188
- hash: 9639f7ebc6a6d69d7bf5b8bc869e7783a1406088f192868624ad8919e9bfd1d4
- ip: 194.76.227.94
- ip: 178.16.54.31
- hash: e3513922666c202c1ae5c06eea277ba10477868d6d89ce2819f4f8ff9070bc85
- hash: 01a96eeafb72042b3f69afd21b4c9155dbfe7f97ab3dca392972ad531a075ac2
- ip: 87.120.107.33
- hash: bf24277400cc453d530e4277d3bd24e96c5e409adef6970518bdc59205aa0241
- ip: 2.26.98.67
- hash: 946a9cc6b501d993a108c90ef7d0930d
- hash: c98aa812a271c9c78017c2c90b60a97ae13df9cf
- hash: 04d20417bb04779c8762032b8c6942be
- hash: 0783237785d65621d1e887f24cc2103b
- hash: 1fec4103f40b6432e45d67fc87b504e024962376
- hash: 7f6f4b3b341818b6db89fac39efb6c257addde95
- hash: cc43cdbe8eb9874f55fffbe23b560b673eb9f31fb9a953926bba29464fd2dd07
- hash: e310476c41ae4f6e3c4ed9bb88303ee6e5e1455bd7afe51cf48965ea7599e6e5
- hash: e5715e6611ef6bcb233f5d2098510dab3db408abbb728b00e1821bb255829373
- ip: 62.60.179.230
Almost Half of Malware Samples Communicate Direct to IP
Description
Analysis of 4 million dynamic malware reports shows that nearly half of malware samples with command-and-control (C2) activity use direct-to-IP (D2IP) connections, bypassing DNS and evading DNS-based defenses. D2IP accounts for over 23% of all C2 attempts and is observed in diverse malware families including ransomware droppers, data exfiltration campaigns, and IoT botnets. The research proposes a zero trust IP (ZT-IP) enforcement approach to block unauthorized outbound IP connections that are not sanctioned by DNS responses.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
This research analyzes 4 million dynamic malware reports and finds that 45.32% of malware samples exhibiting command-and-control activity establish direct-to-IP (D2IP) connections, completely bypassing DNS resolution. This evasion technique undermines traditional DNS-based security controls. D2IP traffic constitutes 23.17% of all C2 connection attempts. The behavior is present across multiple malware types such as Phorpiex ransomware droppers with hard-coded IPs, persistent data exfiltration campaigns using obfuscated HTTP GET requests, SectopRAT targeting educational institutions with in-browser proxy capabilities, and IoT botnets like Mozi and Boatnet propagating via peer-to-peer networks. The study introduces zero trust IP (ZT-IP), a network-level enforcement mechanism that validates outbound connection destinations against previously authorized DNS responses to block malicious D2IP communications.
Potential Impact
Malware using direct-to-IP connections can evade DNS-based detection and blocking mechanisms, increasing the difficulty of identifying and mitigating command-and-control communications. This technique enables persistent and stealthy malware operations including ransomware deployment, data exfiltration, and botnet propagation. The widespread use of D2IP across diverse malware families and attack vectors highlights a significant gap in traditional network security defenses relying on DNS monitoring.
Defensive Guidance
No official patch or vendor advisory is available for this behavior as it is a malware communication technique rather than a software vulnerability. The research proposes implementing zero trust IP (ZT-IP) network enforcement, which restricts outbound connections to IP addresses previously authorized by DNS responses. Organizations should consider deploying network-level controls that verify IP destinations against DNS resolutions to detect and block unauthorized direct-to-IP communications. This approach complements existing DNS-based security controls and addresses the evasion technique described.
Technical Details
- Author
- AlienVault
- Tlp
- white
- References
- ["https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/malware-bypass-dns-direct-to-ip/"]
- Adversary
- null
- Pulse Id
- 6a71e43a0127c62218b7c365
- Threat Score
- null
Indicators of Compromise
Ip
| Value | Description | Copy |
|---|---|---|
ip103.245.236.146 | — | |
ip154.92.19.71 | — | |
ip178.16.54.109 | — | |
ip91.92.243.29 | — | |
ip194.76.227.94 | — | |
ip178.16.54.31 | — | |
ip87.120.107.33 | — | |
ip2.26.98.67 | — | |
ip62.60.179.230 | — |
Hash
| Value | Description | Copy |
|---|---|---|
hash083d5895283755a910b5c59d60a5348b | — | |
hash0d94bf4d0418061907ff7977e3f25a463cb25188 | — | |
hash9639f7ebc6a6d69d7bf5b8bc869e7783a1406088f192868624ad8919e9bfd1d4 | — | |
hashe3513922666c202c1ae5c06eea277ba10477868d6d89ce2819f4f8ff9070bc85 | — | |
hash01a96eeafb72042b3f69afd21b4c9155dbfe7f97ab3dca392972ad531a075ac2 | — | |
hashbf24277400cc453d530e4277d3bd24e96c5e409adef6970518bdc59205aa0241 | — | |
hash946a9cc6b501d993a108c90ef7d0930d | — | |
hashc98aa812a271c9c78017c2c90b60a97ae13df9cf | — | |
hash04d20417bb04779c8762032b8c6942be | — | |
hash0783237785d65621d1e887f24cc2103b | — | |
hash1fec4103f40b6432e45d67fc87b504e024962376 | — | |
hash7f6f4b3b341818b6db89fac39efb6c257addde95 | — | |
hashcc43cdbe8eb9874f55fffbe23b560b673eb9f31fb9a953926bba29464fd2dd07 | — | |
hashe310476c41ae4f6e3c4ed9bb88303ee6e5e1455bd7afe51cf48965ea7599e6e5 | — | |
hashe5715e6611ef6bcb233f5d2098510dab3db408abbb728b00e1821bb255829373 | — |
Threat ID: 6a71fa1ebf8831d539f4fa54
Added to database: 08/04/2026, 14:41:34 UTC
Last enriched: 08/04/2026, 15:32:20 UTC
Last updated: 08/04/2026, 18:31:39 UTC
Views: 5
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.