Skip to main content

CVE-2023-49287: CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in cxong tinydir

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2023-49287cvecve-2023-49287cwe-120cwe-121
Published: Mon Dec 04 2023 (12/04/2023, 05:29:10 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: cxong
Product: tinydir

Description

TinyDir is a lightweight C directory and file reader. Buffer overflows in the `tinydir_file_open()` function. This vulnerability has been patched in version 1.2.6.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/08/2025, 02:41:59 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2023-49287 is a high-severity buffer overflow vulnerability identified in the TinyDir library, a lightweight C library used for directory and file reading operations. The vulnerability exists specifically in the function tinydir_file_open(), where a buffer copy operation is performed without proper validation of the input size. This classic buffer overflow (CWE-120) can lead to memory corruption, potentially allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory regions. The vulnerability affects all versions of TinyDir prior to 1.2.6, with the issue patched in version 1.2.6. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 7.7, reflecting high severity, with an attack vector of local (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality impact (C:N), but high integrity (I:H) and availability (A:H) impacts. This means an attacker with local access can exploit the vulnerability to cause significant disruption or modification of the affected system's state without needing authentication or user interaction. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild. The vulnerability is rooted in improper bounds checking during buffer copy operations, a common and critical programming error in C that can lead to crashes, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution depending on the context of use. Given TinyDir’s role as a file and directory reader, exploitation could impact applications or systems relying on it for file system operations, especially if they run with elevated privileges or handle untrusted input paths.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the use of TinyDir within their software stacks. Organizations using TinyDir in local applications or embedded systems could face risks of denial of service or integrity compromise if an attacker gains local access. Since the attack vector is local, remote exploitation is not directly feasible unless combined with other vulnerabilities or attack vectors that provide local code execution or access. Critical infrastructure or industrial control systems using TinyDir could experience operational disruptions. Additionally, software vendors in Europe incorporating TinyDir into their products may inadvertently distribute vulnerable versions, increasing the attack surface. The lack of confidentiality impact reduces risks related to data leakage, but the high integrity and availability impacts mean that system reliability and correctness could be severely affected. This is particularly concerning for sectors requiring high availability and data integrity such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, but the presence of a public CVE and patch availability means attackers may develop exploits over time.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately audit their software inventories to identify any use of TinyDir versions prior to 1.2.6. Where found, upgrading to version 1.2.6 or later is essential to remediate the vulnerability. For software vendors, integrating the patched version into their build and release pipelines is critical. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible, applying strict access controls to limit local user access can reduce exploitation risk. Employing runtime protections such as stack canaries, address space layout randomization (ASLR), and control flow integrity (CFI) can mitigate exploitation impact. Code review and static analysis tools should be used to detect similar buffer overflow patterns in custom code. Additionally, monitoring for unusual application crashes or behavior related to file operations can help detect exploitation attempts. For embedded or specialized systems, firmware updates incorporating the patched library should be prioritized. Finally, educating developers about secure coding practices, especially regarding buffer handling in C, will help prevent similar vulnerabilities.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2023-11-24T16:45:24.312Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68386ba6182aa0cae2809bcc

Added to database: 5/29/2025, 2:13:58 PM

Last enriched: 7/8/2025, 2:41:59 AM

Last updated: 8/3/2025, 6:16:41 AM

Views: 13

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats