CVE-2023-52356VulnerabilityPublished 25 Jan 2024Updated 10 Dec 2025

CVE-2023-52356: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 2.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 82% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Jan 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2023-52356, European organizations should immediately identify all systems and applications that use libtiff for TIFF image processing. Applying official patches or updates from libtiff maintainers or Linux distributions as soon as they become available is critical. In the absence of patches, organizations should implement input validation and filtering to block or quarantine untrusted TIFF files, especially from external or public sources. Employing sandboxing or containerization for applications that process TIFF images can limit the impact of potential crashes. Network-level protections such as intrusion detection systems (IDS) and file scanning can help detect and block malicious TIFF files. Additionally, monitoring application logs for crashes related to TIFF processing can provide early warning signs of exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review and update incident response plans to include scenarios involving denial of service caused by malformed image files. Finally, raising awareness among developers and system administrators about this vulnerability will help ensure timely remediation and reduce exposure.

Description

A segment fault (SEGV) flaw was found in libtiff that could be triggered by passing a crafted tiff file to the TIFFReadRGBATileExt() API. This flaw allows a remote attacker to cause a heap-buffer overflow, leading to a denial of service.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2023-52356 is the potential for denial of service attacks against systems that utilize libtiff for TIFF image processing. This includes document management systems, digital archives, media processing pipelines, and any software handling TIFF images, which are common in government, healthcare, publishing, and multimedia sectors. Disruption of these services could lead to operational downtime, affecting business continuity and service availability. Although the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the loss of availability can have cascading effects, such as delayed workflows, inability to access critical documents, or interruption of automated image processing tasks. Organizations relying on open-source software stacks or embedded systems using libtiff are particularly vulnerable. The lack of required authentication or user interaction means that attackers can exploit this remotely and silently by sending malicious TIFF files, increasing the risk of automated or large-scale attacks. Given the high CVSS score and ease of exploitation, European entities should consider this a significant threat to service reliability.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…