CVE-2023-52527: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4, ipv6: Fix handling of transhdrlen in __ip{,6}_append_data() Including the transhdrlen in length is a problem when the packet is partially filled (e.g. something like send(MSG_MORE) happened previously) when appending to an IPv4 or IPv6 packet as we don't want to repeat the transport header or account for it twice. This can happen under some circumstances, such as splicing into an L2TP socket. The symptom observed is a warning in __ip6_append_data(): WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5042 at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 __ip6_append_data.isra.0+0x1be8/0x47f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 that occurs when MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used to append more data to an already partially occupied skbuff. The warning occurs when 'copy' is larger than the amount of data in the message iterator. This is because the requested length includes the transport header length when it shouldn't. This can be triggered by, for example: sfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_L2TP); bind(sfd, ...); // ::1 connect(sfd, ...); // ::1 port 7 send(sfd, buffer, 4100, MSG_MORE); sendfile(sfd, dfd, NULL, 1024); Fix this by only adding transhdrlen into the length if the write queue is empty in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg(), analogously to how UDP does things. l2tp_ip_sendmsg() looks like it won't suffer from this problem as it builds the UDP packet itself.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-52527 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's IPv4 and IPv6 networking stack, specifically related to the handling of the transport header length (transhdrlen) in the __ip_append_data() and __ip6_append_data() functions. The issue arises when appending data to a partially filled socket buffer (skbuff), such as when using the MSG_MORE flag in send operations or splicing data into an L2TP (Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol) socket. The vulnerability manifests because the transport header length is incorrectly included in the length calculation when it should not be, leading to potential double counting of the transport header or repeating it. This causes a warning in the kernel at __ip6_append_data(), indicating a mismatch between the requested copy size and the actual data available in the message iterator. The problem can be triggered by sequences of socket operations involving IPv6 UDP sockets with L2TP protocol, for example, sending data with MSG_MORE followed by a sendfile call. The root cause is that the transhdrlen is added to the length regardless of whether the write queue is empty, which is inconsistent with how UDP handles this scenario. The fix implemented ensures that transhdrlen is only added if the write queue is empty in the l2tp_ip6_sendmsg() function, preventing the double counting and associated warnings. The l2tp_ip_sendmsg() function for IPv4 is not affected as it constructs the UDP packet differently. This vulnerability is technical and subtle, primarily causing kernel warnings and potentially unstable behavior in packet handling under specific conditions involving L2TP sockets and partial packet sends. There are no known exploits in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-52527 depends largely on their use of Linux systems running vulnerable kernel versions and their deployment of L2TP tunnels or similar networking configurations that involve partial packet sends with MSG_MORE or splicing operations. The vulnerability could lead to kernel warnings and potentially unstable network behavior or packet corruption in affected systems, which might degrade network performance or cause service interruptions. While no direct remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the instability could affect critical network infrastructure, VPN gateways, or communication services relying on L2TP over IPv6. This could impact confidentiality and availability if network tunnels are disrupted or packets are malformed. Given the Linux kernel's widespread use in servers, cloud infrastructure, and embedded devices across Europe, organizations with complex networking setups or those using L2TP-based VPNs should be particularly vigilant. However, the lack of known exploits and the requirement for specific socket operations reduce the immediate risk of widespread exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2023-52527, European organizations should: 1) Apply the latest Linux kernel patches that address this vulnerability as soon as they become available, ensuring that the fix in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg() is included. 2) Review and audit network applications and services that use L2TP tunnels, especially those employing IPv6 and partial packet sends with MSG_MORE or sendfile, to identify potential exposure. 3) Implement monitoring for kernel warnings related to __ip6_append_data() to detect attempts to trigger this condition or related anomalies in network traffic. 4) Where possible, limit or avoid the use of MSG_MORE with L2TP sockets until patched, or use alternative VPN protocols less affected by this issue. 5) For critical infrastructure, consider network segmentation and strict access controls to reduce the attack surface and limit the impact of potential network stack instability. 6) Maintain up-to-date inventories of Linux kernel versions in use and prioritize patching for systems involved in L2TP or advanced networking configurations. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific networking conditions that trigger the vulnerability and emphasizing proactive monitoring and configuration adjustments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2023-52527: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4, ipv6: Fix handling of transhdrlen in __ip{,6}_append_data() Including the transhdrlen in length is a problem when the packet is partially filled (e.g. something like send(MSG_MORE) happened previously) when appending to an IPv4 or IPv6 packet as we don't want to repeat the transport header or account for it twice. This can happen under some circumstances, such as splicing into an L2TP socket. The symptom observed is a warning in __ip6_append_data(): WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5042 at net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 __ip6_append_data.isra.0+0x1be8/0x47f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1800 that occurs when MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used to append more data to an already partially occupied skbuff. The warning occurs when 'copy' is larger than the amount of data in the message iterator. This is because the requested length includes the transport header length when it shouldn't. This can be triggered by, for example: sfd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_L2TP); bind(sfd, ...); // ::1 connect(sfd, ...); // ::1 port 7 send(sfd, buffer, 4100, MSG_MORE); sendfile(sfd, dfd, NULL, 1024); Fix this by only adding transhdrlen into the length if the write queue is empty in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg(), analogously to how UDP does things. l2tp_ip_sendmsg() looks like it won't suffer from this problem as it builds the UDP packet itself.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-52527 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's IPv4 and IPv6 networking stack, specifically related to the handling of the transport header length (transhdrlen) in the __ip_append_data() and __ip6_append_data() functions. The issue arises when appending data to a partially filled socket buffer (skbuff), such as when using the MSG_MORE flag in send operations or splicing data into an L2TP (Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol) socket. The vulnerability manifests because the transport header length is incorrectly included in the length calculation when it should not be, leading to potential double counting of the transport header or repeating it. This causes a warning in the kernel at __ip6_append_data(), indicating a mismatch between the requested copy size and the actual data available in the message iterator. The problem can be triggered by sequences of socket operations involving IPv6 UDP sockets with L2TP protocol, for example, sending data with MSG_MORE followed by a sendfile call. The root cause is that the transhdrlen is added to the length regardless of whether the write queue is empty, which is inconsistent with how UDP handles this scenario. The fix implemented ensures that transhdrlen is only added if the write queue is empty in the l2tp_ip6_sendmsg() function, preventing the double counting and associated warnings. The l2tp_ip_sendmsg() function for IPv4 is not affected as it constructs the UDP packet differently. This vulnerability is technical and subtle, primarily causing kernel warnings and potentially unstable behavior in packet handling under specific conditions involving L2TP sockets and partial packet sends. There are no known exploits in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-52527 depends largely on their use of Linux systems running vulnerable kernel versions and their deployment of L2TP tunnels or similar networking configurations that involve partial packet sends with MSG_MORE or splicing operations. The vulnerability could lead to kernel warnings and potentially unstable network behavior or packet corruption in affected systems, which might degrade network performance or cause service interruptions. While no direct remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the instability could affect critical network infrastructure, VPN gateways, or communication services relying on L2TP over IPv6. This could impact confidentiality and availability if network tunnels are disrupted or packets are malformed. Given the Linux kernel's widespread use in servers, cloud infrastructure, and embedded devices across Europe, organizations with complex networking setups or those using L2TP-based VPNs should be particularly vigilant. However, the lack of known exploits and the requirement for specific socket operations reduce the immediate risk of widespread exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2023-52527, European organizations should: 1) Apply the latest Linux kernel patches that address this vulnerability as soon as they become available, ensuring that the fix in l2tp_ip6_sendmsg() is included. 2) Review and audit network applications and services that use L2TP tunnels, especially those employing IPv6 and partial packet sends with MSG_MORE or sendfile, to identify potential exposure. 3) Implement monitoring for kernel warnings related to __ip6_append_data() to detect attempts to trigger this condition or related anomalies in network traffic. 4) Where possible, limit or avoid the use of MSG_MORE with L2TP sockets until patched, or use alternative VPN protocols less affected by this issue. 5) For critical infrastructure, consider network segmentation and strict access controls to reduce the attack surface and limit the impact of potential network stack instability. 6) Maintain up-to-date inventories of Linux kernel versions in use and prioritize patching for systems involved in L2TP or advanced networking configurations. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific networking conditions that trigger the vulnerability and emphasizing proactive monitoring and configuration adjustments.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-02-20T12:30:33.318Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9831c4522896dcbe7c4c
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:05 AM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 10:12:20 AM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 6:11:05 AM
Views: 15
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowCVE-2025-9089: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-9088: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.