VulnerabilityPublished 30 Nov 2023Updated 3 Jun 2025

CVE-2023-6344: Tyler Technologies Court Case Management Plus · Improper Authentication

Affects Tyler Technologies Court Case Management PlusSource CVE Database V5

Mentioned vulnerabilities

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 60% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Nov 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Tyler Technologies Court Case Management Plus	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Verify the version of Tyler Technologies Court Case Management Plus in use and confirm whether the vulnerable Aquaforest TIFF Server component (version 2.x) is present. 2) Upgrade to the latest software version where the vulnerable TIFF Server feature has been removed or patched. 3) If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network-level controls such as restricting access to the tiffserver endpoints (te003.aspx, te004.aspx) via firewalls or web application firewalls (WAFs) to trusted IP ranges only. 4) Conduct thorough configuration reviews of the Aquaforest TIFF Server component to identify and remediate insecure settings as per CVE-2023-6352 guidance. 5) Monitor logs for unusual access patterns targeting the 'ifolder' parameter or TIFF server endpoints to detect potential reconnaissance attempts. 6) Engage with Tyler Technologies support for official patches or mitigation advice and apply them promptly once available. 7) Incorporate this vulnerability into risk assessments and incident response plans, especially for legal and judicial IT environments.

Description

Tyler Technologies Court Case Management Plus allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to enumerate directories using the tiffserver/te003.aspx or te004.aspx 'ifolder' parameter. This behavior is related to the use of a deprecated version of Aquaforest TIFF Server, possibly 2.x. The vulnerable Aquaforest TIFF Server feature was removed on or around 2023-11-01. Insecure configuration issues in Aquaforest TIFF Server are identified separately as CVE-2023-6352. CVE-2023-6343 is related to or partially caused by CVE-2023-6352.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly those in the public sector such as courts, legal institutions, and government agencies using Tyler Technologies Court Case Management Plus, this vulnerability poses a risk of information disclosure through directory enumeration. While the vulnerability does not allow direct data modification or system disruption, the exposure of directory structures and file names can facilitate targeted attacks, including phishing, social engineering, or further exploitation of other vulnerabilities. Given the sensitive nature of court case management systems, even limited information disclosure can undermine confidentiality and trust. Additionally, the presence of deprecated components may indicate outdated software versions, increasing overall risk. Organizations handling EU citizen data must also consider compliance with GDPR requirements concerning data protection and breach notification. Although no active exploitation is reported, the vulnerability's remote and unauthenticated nature makes it accessible to a wide range of threat actors, increasing the urgency for mitigation.

CWE-287Improper Authentication (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Fake the Source of Data (opens in a new tab)
Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data (opens in a new tab)
Session Hijacking (opens in a new tab)
Token Impersonation (opens in a new tab)
Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Jul 2025, 18:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-287

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats