CVE-2024-11205VulnerabilityPublished 10 Dec 2024

CVE-2024-11205: WPForms (WordPress plugin) · Missing Authorization

Affects WPForms (WordPress plugin)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.5 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 53% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Dec 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
smub WPForms – Easy Form Builder for WordPress – Contact Forms, Payment Forms, Surveys, & More	Affected =1.8.4	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-11205, organizations should immediately upgrade WPForms to a patched version once available from the vendor. Until a patch is released, administrators should restrict Subscriber-level users from accessing any payment or subscription management interfaces, possibly by implementing custom role restrictions or using WordPress capability management plugins to tighten access controls. Monitoring and auditing user activities related to payment refunds and subscription cancellations can help detect suspicious behavior early. Employing Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to block unauthorized access patterns targeting WPForms admin functions may reduce risk. Additionally, enforcing strong authentication mechanisms and minimizing the number of users with elevated privileges can limit exploitation potential. Regular backups of payment and subscription data are essential to recover from any unauthorized changes. Organizations should also stay informed through vendor advisories and security communities for any released patches or exploit reports. Finally, consider isolating payment processing components or using dedicated payment gateways external to WordPress to reduce exposure.

Description

The WPForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'wpforms_is_admin_page' function in versions starting from 1.8.4 up to, and including, 1.9.2.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to refund payments and cancel subscriptions.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2024-11205 is unauthorized modification of payment and subscription data, which can lead to financial losses, fraudulent refunds, and disruption of subscription services. Organizations using the affected WPForms versions risk unauthorized users manipulating transactions, undermining customer trust and potentially causing revenue loss. The integrity of financial records and subscription statuses can be compromised, complicating reconciliation and customer support. Although availability and confidentiality are not directly affected, the financial and reputational damage can be significant. E-commerce sites, membership platforms, and any WordPress-based service relying on WPForms for payment and subscription management are particularly vulnerable. The vulnerability's exploitation requires only authenticated access at a low privilege level, increasing the likelihood of insider threats or compromised user accounts being leveraged. The scope change means that attackers can affect resources beyond their initial permissions, amplifying the threat. Organizations worldwide with WordPress installations using this plugin are at risk, especially those with large subscriber bases or frequent payment transactions.

CWE-862Missing Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #4OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Feb 2026, 13:24 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-862

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats