CVE-2024-13845: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Gravity Forms Gravity Forms WebHooks
The Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.0 via the 'process_feed' method of the GF_Webhooks class This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-13845 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin for WordPress, specifically in all versions up to and including 1.6.0. The vulnerability resides in the 'process_feed' method of the GF_Webhooks class, which processes webhook feeds. SSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to induce the server to send HTTP requests to arbitrary locations, potentially accessing internal resources that are not directly reachable from the external network. In this case, exploitation requires the attacker to have authenticated access with Administrator-level privileges or higher, which means the attacker must already have significant control over the WordPress environment. Once exploited, the attacker can leverage the server's network privileges to query internal services, potentially extracting sensitive information or modifying internal data. The vulnerability is rated with a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (medium severity), reflecting its moderate impact on confidentiality and integrity, low attack complexity, and the requirement for high privileges. No user interaction is needed, and the vulnerability affects all versions of the plugin up to 1.6.0. There are no known public exploits or patches available at the time of publication, but the vulnerability has been officially published and enriched by CISA, highlighting its relevance. This SSRF can be particularly dangerous in environments where internal services are critical and sensitive, such as internal APIs, cloud metadata services, or administrative interfaces that are not exposed externally.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this SSRF vulnerability is the potential unauthorized access and manipulation of internal network resources from the compromised WordPress server. Attackers with administrator access can exploit this to bypass network segmentation and firewall protections, accessing sensitive internal services such as databases, internal APIs, or cloud provider metadata endpoints. This can lead to data leakage, unauthorized data modification, or further lateral movement within the network. Since the vulnerability requires administrator privileges, the risk is heightened in environments where administrator accounts are compromised or shared insecurely. The exploitation could facilitate advanced persistent threats (APTs) or insider threats, enabling attackers to gather intelligence or disrupt internal operations. Organizations relying on Gravity Forms WebHooks for critical workflows may face confidentiality and integrity breaches, potentially impacting business continuity and compliance with data protection regulations. Although availability impact is low, the indirect consequences of data exposure or manipulation could be severe. The vulnerability's medium severity score reflects these risks, emphasizing the need for prompt remediation to prevent exploitation in environments with sensitive internal services.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-13845, organizations should first verify if they are using the Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin version 1.6.0 or earlier and plan immediate upgrades once a patched version is released. Until a patch is available, restrict administrator access strictly to trusted personnel and enforce strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of account compromise. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the WordPress server's ability to initiate outbound requests to internal services, effectively reducing the SSRF attack surface. Monitor and audit administrator activities and webhook configurations for suspicious changes or unusual request patterns. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SSRF attempts targeting internal IP ranges or sensitive endpoints. Additionally, review and harden internal services to require authentication and minimize exposure to requests originating from the WordPress server. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and privilege escalation vectors within the WordPress environment. Finally, maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans to quickly recover from potential exploitation.
Affected Countries
United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia, France, Netherlands, India, Japan, Brazil
CVE-2024-13845: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Gravity Forms Gravity Forms WebHooks
Description
The Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.0 via the 'process_feed' method of the GF_Webhooks class This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-13845 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in the Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin for WordPress, specifically in all versions up to and including 1.6.0. The vulnerability resides in the 'process_feed' method of the GF_Webhooks class, which processes webhook feeds. SSRF vulnerabilities allow attackers to induce the server to send HTTP requests to arbitrary locations, potentially accessing internal resources that are not directly reachable from the external network. In this case, exploitation requires the attacker to have authenticated access with Administrator-level privileges or higher, which means the attacker must already have significant control over the WordPress environment. Once exploited, the attacker can leverage the server's network privileges to query internal services, potentially extracting sensitive information or modifying internal data. The vulnerability is rated with a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (medium severity), reflecting its moderate impact on confidentiality and integrity, low attack complexity, and the requirement for high privileges. No user interaction is needed, and the vulnerability affects all versions of the plugin up to 1.6.0. There are no known public exploits or patches available at the time of publication, but the vulnerability has been officially published and enriched by CISA, highlighting its relevance. This SSRF can be particularly dangerous in environments where internal services are critical and sensitive, such as internal APIs, cloud metadata services, or administrative interfaces that are not exposed externally.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of this SSRF vulnerability is the potential unauthorized access and manipulation of internal network resources from the compromised WordPress server. Attackers with administrator access can exploit this to bypass network segmentation and firewall protections, accessing sensitive internal services such as databases, internal APIs, or cloud provider metadata endpoints. This can lead to data leakage, unauthorized data modification, or further lateral movement within the network. Since the vulnerability requires administrator privileges, the risk is heightened in environments where administrator accounts are compromised or shared insecurely. The exploitation could facilitate advanced persistent threats (APTs) or insider threats, enabling attackers to gather intelligence or disrupt internal operations. Organizations relying on Gravity Forms WebHooks for critical workflows may face confidentiality and integrity breaches, potentially impacting business continuity and compliance with data protection regulations. Although availability impact is low, the indirect consequences of data exposure or manipulation could be severe. The vulnerability's medium severity score reflects these risks, emphasizing the need for prompt remediation to prevent exploitation in environments with sensitive internal services.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-13845, organizations should first verify if they are using the Gravity Forms WebHooks plugin version 1.6.0 or earlier and plan immediate upgrades once a patched version is released. Until a patch is available, restrict administrator access strictly to trusted personnel and enforce strong authentication mechanisms such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of account compromise. Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the WordPress server's ability to initiate outbound requests to internal services, effectively reducing the SSRF attack surface. Monitor and audit administrator activities and webhook configurations for suspicious changes or unusual request patterns. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SSRF attempts targeting internal IP ranges or sensitive endpoints. Additionally, review and harden internal services to require authentication and minimize exposure to requests originating from the WordPress server. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF and privilege escalation vectors within the WordPress environment. Finally, maintain up-to-date backups and incident response plans to quickly recover from potential exploitation.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-02-06T22:22:14.310Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9839c4522896dcbecf4f
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:13 AM
Last enriched: 2/28/2026, 7:54:14 AM
Last updated: 3/24/2026, 4:39:49 AM
Views: 68
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.