CVE-2024-42077: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can contain arbitrary number of extents. Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not in all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if the IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to this error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem. To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written(). Heming Zhao said: ------ PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error" PID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA" #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932 #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9 #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2] #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2] #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2] #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2] #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2] #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2] #10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2] #11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7 #12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f #13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2] #14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14 #15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b #16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2] #17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e #18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde #19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada #20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984 #21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-42077 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's OCFS2 (Oracle Cluster File System version 2) filesystem implementation. The flaw arises from improper handling of transaction credits during direct I/O (DIO) write operations on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems. Specifically, the function ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates the number of transaction credits required using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(), but this calculation does not account for arbitrarily large I/O operations containing numerous extents. Extents represent contiguous blocks of storage, and in cases where the I/O contains many single-block extents, the code path repeatedly calls ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() without extending the current transaction. This leads to exhaustion of transaction credits, triggering a WARN_ON condition in the journaling layer (jbd2_handle_buffer_credits) and causing the OCFS2 filesystem to abort. The abort manifests as a kernel panic with a forced system crash, as documented by the panic stack trace provided. This issue was observed in real-world scenarios on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems, indicating practical impact. The fix involves ensuring that before each call to ocfs2_mark_extent_written(), the transaction has enough credits for at least one extent insert, preventing premature exhaustion of credits and subsequent panics. No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash c15471f79506830f80eca0e7fe09b8213953ab5f and similar revisions containing the vulnerable code.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-42077 can be significant in environments utilizing the OCFS2 filesystem, particularly in clustered or high-availability Linux server deployments where OCFS2 is chosen for shared storage. A kernel panic triggered by this vulnerability results in an immediate system crash, causing denial of service (DoS) conditions. This can disrupt critical services, data processing, or storage availability, especially in enterprise data centers, cloud providers, or industries relying on Linux-based clustered storage solutions. Since the vulnerability is triggered by heavily fragmented filesystems and large direct I/O operations, workloads involving intensive file writes or database operations on OCFS2 may be particularly vulnerable. The forced kernel panic also risks potential data loss or corruption if the system crashes during critical write operations. Although no remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the availability impact alone can lead to operational downtime, financial loss, and reputational damage. European organizations with Linux infrastructure using OCFS2 should consider this vulnerability a serious stability and availability risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Apply the Linux kernel update or backported patch that addresses CVE-2024-42077 as soon as it becomes available from trusted Linux distribution vendors or kernel maintainers. 2. Filesystem assessment: Audit and monitor OCFS2 filesystem fragmentation levels and consider defragmentation or migration to alternative filesystems if fragmentation is high and cannot be controlled. 3. Workload tuning: Limit or segment large direct I/O write operations that could trigger the exhaustion of transaction credits, especially on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems. 4. Monitoring and alerting: Implement kernel and system monitoring to detect early signs of WARN_ON conditions related to journaling or transaction credit exhaustion, enabling proactive intervention before a panic occurs. 5. Backup and recovery planning: Ensure robust backup strategies and disaster recovery plans are in place to mitigate data loss risks from unexpected kernel panics. 6. Testing: Before deploying patches in production, test them in staging environments to confirm stability and compatibility with existing workloads and clustered configurations. 7. Vendor coordination: Engage with Linux distribution vendors and OCFS2 maintainers for guidance and timely updates.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-42077: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(). This however does not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can contain arbitrary number of extents. Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not in all of the cases. For example if we have only single block extents in the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if the IO contains many single block extents. Once that happens a WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to this error. This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem. To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written(). Heming Zhao said: ------ PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error" PID: xxx TASK: xxxx CPU: 5 COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA" #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932 #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9 #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2] #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2] #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2] #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2] #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2] #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2] #10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2] #11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7 #12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f #13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2] #14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14 #15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b #16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2] #17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e #18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde #19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada #20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984 #21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-42077 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's OCFS2 (Oracle Cluster File System version 2) filesystem implementation. The flaw arises from improper handling of transaction credits during direct I/O (DIO) write operations on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems. Specifically, the function ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates the number of transaction credits required using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(), but this calculation does not account for arbitrarily large I/O operations containing numerous extents. Extents represent contiguous blocks of storage, and in cases where the I/O contains many single-block extents, the code path repeatedly calls ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() without extending the current transaction. This leads to exhaustion of transaction credits, triggering a WARN_ON condition in the journaling layer (jbd2_handle_buffer_credits) and causing the OCFS2 filesystem to abort. The abort manifests as a kernel panic with a forced system crash, as documented by the panic stack trace provided. This issue was observed in real-world scenarios on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems, indicating practical impact. The fix involves ensuring that before each call to ocfs2_mark_extent_written(), the transaction has enough credits for at least one extent insert, preventing premature exhaustion of credits and subsequent panics. No CVSS score has been assigned yet, and no known exploits are reported in the wild. The vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash c15471f79506830f80eca0e7fe09b8213953ab5f and similar revisions containing the vulnerable code.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-42077 can be significant in environments utilizing the OCFS2 filesystem, particularly in clustered or high-availability Linux server deployments where OCFS2 is chosen for shared storage. A kernel panic triggered by this vulnerability results in an immediate system crash, causing denial of service (DoS) conditions. This can disrupt critical services, data processing, or storage availability, especially in enterprise data centers, cloud providers, or industries relying on Linux-based clustered storage solutions. Since the vulnerability is triggered by heavily fragmented filesystems and large direct I/O operations, workloads involving intensive file writes or database operations on OCFS2 may be particularly vulnerable. The forced kernel panic also risks potential data loss or corruption if the system crashes during critical write operations. Although no remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the availability impact alone can lead to operational downtime, financial loss, and reputational damage. European organizations with Linux infrastructure using OCFS2 should consider this vulnerability a serious stability and availability risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Apply the Linux kernel update or backported patch that addresses CVE-2024-42077 as soon as it becomes available from trusted Linux distribution vendors or kernel maintainers. 2. Filesystem assessment: Audit and monitor OCFS2 filesystem fragmentation levels and consider defragmentation or migration to alternative filesystems if fragmentation is high and cannot be controlled. 3. Workload tuning: Limit or segment large direct I/O write operations that could trigger the exhaustion of transaction credits, especially on heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystems. 4. Monitoring and alerting: Implement kernel and system monitoring to detect early signs of WARN_ON conditions related to journaling or transaction credit exhaustion, enabling proactive intervention before a panic occurs. 5. Backup and recovery planning: Ensure robust backup strategies and disaster recovery plans are in place to mitigate data loss risks from unexpected kernel panics. 6. Testing: Before deploying patches in production, test them in staging environments to confirm stability and compatibility with existing workloads and clustered configurations. 7. Vendor coordination: Engage with Linux distribution vendors and OCFS2 maintainers for guidance and timely updates.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-07-29T15:50:41.169Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9827c4522896dcbe1995
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:55 AM
Last enriched: 6/29/2025, 4:55:34 AM
Last updated: 8/11/2025, 2:26:06 AM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-7384: CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data in crmperks Database for Contact Form 7, WPforms, Elementor forms
CriticalCVE-2025-8491: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in nikelschubert Easy restaurant menu manager
MediumCVE-2025-0818: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in ninjateam File Manager Pro – Filester
MediumCVE-2025-8901: Out of bounds write in Google Chrome
HighCVE-2025-8882: Use after free in Google Chrome
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.