CVE-2024-43869: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release The perf pending task work is never waited upon the matching event release. In the case of a child event, released via free_event() directly, this can potentially result in a leaked event, such as in the following scenario that doesn't even require a weak IRQ work implementation to trigger: schedule() prepare_task_switch() =======> <NMI> perf_event_overflow() event->pending_sigtrap = ... irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq) <======= </NMI> perf_event_task_sched_out() event_sched_out() event->pending_sigtrap = 0; atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount) task_work_add(&event->pending_task) finish_lock_switch() =======> <IRQ> perf_pending_irq() //do nothing, rely on pending task work <======= </IRQ> begin_new_exec() perf_event_exit_task() perf_event_exit_event() // If is child event free_event() WARN(atomic_long_cmpxchg(&event->refcount, 1, 0) != 1) // event is leaked Similar scenarios can also happen with perf_event_remove_on_exec() or simply against concurrent perf_event_release(). Fix this with synchonizing against the possibly remaining pending task work while freeing the event, just like is done with remaining pending IRQ work. This means that the pending task callback neither need nor should hold a reference to the event, preventing it from ever beeing freed.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-43869 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's perf subsystem, which is responsible for performance monitoring and profiling. The flaw arises from improper synchronization when handling perf events, specifically related to the lifecycle management of child events during exec and file release operations. The vulnerability manifests as an event leak caused by the perf pending task work not being properly waited upon or synchronized with the event release. In technical terms, when a child event is released directly via free_event(), the reference counting and task work queuing mechanisms do not correctly coordinate, leading to a scenario where the event remains leaked in memory. This occurs because the pending task callback holds a reference to the event that should have been freed, and the synchronization between pending task work and event freeing is missing. The issue can be triggered without requiring a weak IRQ work implementation, through a sequence involving schedule(), prepare_task_switch(), and interrupt handlers such as NMI and IRQ, culminating in perf_event_exit_task() and free_event() calls that fail to properly release the event. The fix involves synchronizing against any remaining pending task work when freeing the event, similar to the existing synchronization for pending IRQ work, and ensuring that the pending task callback neither holds nor needs a reference to the event. This correction prevents the event from being leaked and improves the robustness of the perf subsystem's event lifecycle management.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could have several implications. The Linux kernel is widely used across servers, cloud infrastructure, embedded systems, and desktops in Europe. A leaked event in the perf subsystem could lead to resource exhaustion over time, potentially degrading system performance or causing instability in critical systems. While the vulnerability does not directly enable remote code execution or privilege escalation, the memory leak could be exploited in complex attack chains or denial-of-service scenarios, especially in multi-tenant environments like cloud providers or data centers. Organizations relying on Linux-based performance monitoring tools might experience inaccurate profiling data or system slowdowns. Additionally, if attackers can trigger this leak repeatedly, it could lead to increased memory consumption, impacting availability and reliability of services. Given the perf subsystem's role in performance diagnostics, this vulnerability might also hinder incident response and forensic analysis capabilities if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernel to the patched versions that address CVE-2024-43869 as soon as they become available. Since this vulnerability involves kernel-level event handling, applying vendor-provided kernel updates or backported patches is the most effective mitigation. Organizations should audit their systems to identify Linux kernel versions affected by this flaw and deploy updates in test environments before production rollout to ensure stability. Additionally, monitoring system logs for unusual perf event behavior or memory leaks can help detect exploitation attempts. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, limiting the use of perf tools to trusted users and restricting access to kernel performance monitoring interfaces can reduce exposure. Implementing resource limits and monitoring for abnormal memory usage patterns may also help mitigate the impact. Finally, organizations should maintain robust incident response procedures to quickly address any performance degradation or stability issues potentially linked to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium
CVE-2024-43869: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release The perf pending task work is never waited upon the matching event release. In the case of a child event, released via free_event() directly, this can potentially result in a leaked event, such as in the following scenario that doesn't even require a weak IRQ work implementation to trigger: schedule() prepare_task_switch() =======> <NMI> perf_event_overflow() event->pending_sigtrap = ... irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq) <======= </NMI> perf_event_task_sched_out() event_sched_out() event->pending_sigtrap = 0; atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount) task_work_add(&event->pending_task) finish_lock_switch() =======> <IRQ> perf_pending_irq() //do nothing, rely on pending task work <======= </IRQ> begin_new_exec() perf_event_exit_task() perf_event_exit_event() // If is child event free_event() WARN(atomic_long_cmpxchg(&event->refcount, 1, 0) != 1) // event is leaked Similar scenarios can also happen with perf_event_remove_on_exec() or simply against concurrent perf_event_release(). Fix this with synchonizing against the possibly remaining pending task work while freeing the event, just like is done with remaining pending IRQ work. This means that the pending task callback neither need nor should hold a reference to the event, preventing it from ever beeing freed.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-43869 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's perf subsystem, which is responsible for performance monitoring and profiling. The flaw arises from improper synchronization when handling perf events, specifically related to the lifecycle management of child events during exec and file release operations. The vulnerability manifests as an event leak caused by the perf pending task work not being properly waited upon or synchronized with the event release. In technical terms, when a child event is released directly via free_event(), the reference counting and task work queuing mechanisms do not correctly coordinate, leading to a scenario where the event remains leaked in memory. This occurs because the pending task callback holds a reference to the event that should have been freed, and the synchronization between pending task work and event freeing is missing. The issue can be triggered without requiring a weak IRQ work implementation, through a sequence involving schedule(), prepare_task_switch(), and interrupt handlers such as NMI and IRQ, culminating in perf_event_exit_task() and free_event() calls that fail to properly release the event. The fix involves synchronizing against any remaining pending task work when freeing the event, similar to the existing synchronization for pending IRQ work, and ensuring that the pending task callback neither holds nor needs a reference to the event. This correction prevents the event from being leaked and improves the robustness of the perf subsystem's event lifecycle management.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could have several implications. The Linux kernel is widely used across servers, cloud infrastructure, embedded systems, and desktops in Europe. A leaked event in the perf subsystem could lead to resource exhaustion over time, potentially degrading system performance or causing instability in critical systems. While the vulnerability does not directly enable remote code execution or privilege escalation, the memory leak could be exploited in complex attack chains or denial-of-service scenarios, especially in multi-tenant environments like cloud providers or data centers. Organizations relying on Linux-based performance monitoring tools might experience inaccurate profiling data or system slowdowns. Additionally, if attackers can trigger this leak repeatedly, it could lead to increased memory consumption, impacting availability and reliability of services. Given the perf subsystem's role in performance diagnostics, this vulnerability might also hinder incident response and forensic analysis capabilities if exploited.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernel to the patched versions that address CVE-2024-43869 as soon as they become available. Since this vulnerability involves kernel-level event handling, applying vendor-provided kernel updates or backported patches is the most effective mitigation. Organizations should audit their systems to identify Linux kernel versions affected by this flaw and deploy updates in test environments before production rollout to ensure stability. Additionally, monitoring system logs for unusual perf event behavior or memory leaks can help detect exploitation attempts. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, limiting the use of perf tools to trusted users and restricting access to kernel performance monitoring interfaces can reduce exposure. Implementing resource limits and monitoring for abnormal memory usage patterns may also help mitigate the impact. Finally, organizations should maintain robust incident response procedures to quickly address any performance degradation or stability issues potentially linked to this vulnerability.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-08-17T09:11:59.280Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9820c4522896dcbdcd6c
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:48 AM
Last enriched: 6/27/2025, 8:59:17 PM
Last updated: 8/5/2025, 6:55:06 AM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8293: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Theerawat Patthawee Intl DateTime Calendar
MediumCVE-2025-7686: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in lmyoaoa weichuncai(WP伪春菜)
MediumCVE-2025-7684: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in remysharp Last.fm Recent Album Artwork
MediumCVE-2025-7683: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in janyksteenbeek LatestCheckins
MediumCVE-2025-7668: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in timothyja Linux Promotional Plugin
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.