CVE-2024-53031: Qualcomm Snapdragon · Improper Input Validation
Affects Qualcomm SnapdragonSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Mar 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.
What to do
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2024-53031, organizations should: 1) Monitor Qualcomm’s advisories closely and apply official patches or firmware updates as soon as they become available. 2) Implement strict isolation mechanisms between guest virtual machines and the host to limit the impact of potential memory corruption. 3) Employ runtime memory protection technologies such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) and Data Execution Prevention (DEP) where supported. 4) Restrict access to virtualization management interfaces and enforce least privilege principles to reduce the risk of local attackers gaining VM control. 5) Conduct thorough security testing and fuzzing of VM interfaces to detect similar input validation issues proactively. 6) Deploy advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of identifying anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 7) For mobile and embedded devices, coordinate with OEMs and carriers to ensure timely distribution of security updates. 8) Educate security teams about the risks of guest VM buffer manipulation and encourage continuous monitoring of system logs for suspicious activity.
Description
Memory corruption while reading a type value from a buffer controlled by the Guest Virtual Machine.